Alkaline peroxide assisted wet air oxidation pretreatment approach to enhance enzymatic convertibility of rice husk

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 691-697

  Banerjee, Saumita ^a,b   Sen, Ramkrishna ^a   Mudliar, Sandeep ^b   Pandey, R A ^b   Chakrabarti, Tapan ^b   Satpute, Dewanand ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Alkaline peroxide pretreatment; Bioethanol; Enzymatic convertibility; Rice husk; Wet air oxidation

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PEROXIDE; ALKALINE PEROXIDE PRETREATMENT; BIOMASS STRUCTURE; ENZYMATIC CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC CONVERTIBILITY; HIGH DRY MATTER; LIQUID FRACTION; PRE-TREATMENT; RAW RICE; RICE HUSK; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SOLID FRACTION; WET AIR OXIDATION;

ALKALINITY; CELLULOSE; ETHANOL; GLUCOSE; OLIGOMERS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

OXIDATION;

CELLULOSE; GLUCOSE; HEMICELLULOSE; HYDROLASE; LIGNIN; PEROXIDE; POLYSACCHARIDE;

AIR; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; RICE; SOLUBILITY; TECHNIQUE;

AIR; CELLULOSE; GLUCOSE; HYDROLASES; LIGNIN; METHODS; ORYZA SATIVA; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PEROXIDES; POLYSACCHARIDES; SOLUBILITY;

EID: 79958707683     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.589     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lynd LR, Cushman JH, Nichols RJ, Wyman CE. Fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Science. 1991; 251: 1318-1323.
2. Lynd LR, Wyman CE, Gerngross TU. Biocommodity engineering. Biotechnol Prog. 1999; 15: 777-793.
3. Kim S, Dale BE. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioener. 2004; 26: 361-375.
4. Lal R. World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ Int. 2005; 31: 575-584.
5. Ghosh P, Ghose TK. Bioethanol in India: recent past and emerging future. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2003; 85: 1-27.
6. Bhojvaid PP, editor. Biofuels: Towards a Greener and Secure Energy Future. New Delhi: TERI Press; 2006.
7. Theoretical ethanol yield calculator (U.S. Department of Energy). Available at Last accessed on June 28, 2010.
8. Saha BC, Cotta MA. Enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of alkaline peroxide pretreated rice hulls to ethanol. Enz Microb Technol. 2007; 41: 528-532.
9. Bharadwaj A, Wang Y, Sridhar S, Arunachalam VS. Pyrolysis of rice husk. Curr Sci. 2004; 87/7: 981-986.
10. Martin C, Thomsen AB. Wet oxidation pretreatment of lignocellulosic residues of sugarcane, rice, cassava and peanuts for ethanol. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2007; 82: 174-181.
11. Saha BC, Cotta MA. Lime pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of rice hulls to ethanol. Biomass Bioener. 2008; 32: 971-977.
12. Banerjee S, Sen R, Pandey RA, Chakrabarti T, Satpute D, Giri BS, Mudliar S. Evaluation of wet air oxidation as a pretreatment strategy for bioethanol production from rice husk and process optimization. Biomass Bioener. 2009; 33: 1680-686.
13. Gould MJ. Studies on the mechanism of alkaline peroxide delignification of agricultural residues. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985; 27: 225-231.
14. Patel MP, Bhatt RM. Optimisation of the alkaline peroxide pretreatment for the delignification of rice straw and its applications. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1992; 53: 253-263.
15. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2008.
16. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D. Determination of Sugars, Byproducts, and Degradation Products in Liquid Fraction Process Samples. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2006.
17. Gould MJ. Alkaline peroxide delignification of agricultural residues to enhance enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1984; 26: 46-52.
18. Varga E, Schmidt AS, Reczey K, Thomsen AB. Pretreatment of corn stover using wet oxidation to enhance enzymatic digestibility. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2003; 104: 37-50.
19. Kumar R, Mago G, Balan V, Wyman CE. Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies. Biores Technol. 2009; 100: 3948-3962.
20. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Potential inhibitors from wet oxidation of wheat straw and their effect on growth and ethanol production by Thermoanaerobacter mathranii. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001; 57: 631-638.
21. Klinke HB, Olsson L, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Potential inhibitors from wet oxidation of wheat straw and their effect on growth and ethanol production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: wet oxidation and fermentation by yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003; 81: 738-747.
22. Varga E, Klinke HB, Reczey K, Thomsen AB. High solid simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of wet oxidized corn stover to ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004; 88: 576-584.
23. Klinke HB, Ahring BK, Schmidt AS, Thomsen AB. Characterization of degradation products from alkaline wet oxidation of wheat straw. Biores Technol. 2002; 82: 15-26.
24. Jing X, Zhang X, Bao J. Inhibition performance of lignocellulose degradation products on industrial cellulase enzymes during cellulose hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009; 159: 696-707.
25. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates: II. inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Biores Technol. 2000; 74: 25-33.
26. Martin C, Gonzalez Y, Fernandez T, Thomsen AB. Investigation of cellulose convertibility and ethanolic fermentation of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by wet oxidation and steam explosion. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2006; 81: 1669-1677.
27. Banerjee S. Studies on bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. M.E. thesis, 2008, National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, India and Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India.
28. Banerjee S, Mudliar S, Sen R, Giri BS, Satpute D, Chakrabarti T, Pandey RA. Commercializing lignocellulosic bioethanol: technology bottlenecks and possible remedies. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2010; 4: 77-93.
29. Andric P, Meyer AS, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K. Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis II. quantification of inhibition and suitability of membrane reactors. Biotechnol Adv. 2010; 28: 407-425.
30. Kumar R, Wyman CE. An improved method to directly estimate cellulase adsorption on biomass solids. Enz Microbial Technol. 2008; 42: 426-433.
31. Xiao Z, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN. Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and beta-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2004; 113-116: 1115-1126.
32. Hodge DB, Karim MN, Schell DJ, McMillan JD. Soluble and insoluble solids contributions to high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biores Technol. 2008; 99: 8940-8948.