Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis. II. Quantification of inhibition and suitability of membrane reactors

Biotechnology Advances

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 407-425

  Andrić, Pavle ^a   Meyer, Anne S ^a   Jensen, Peter A ^a   Dam Johansen, Kim ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Enzyme inhibition; Glucose removal; Hydrolysis kinetics; Membrane reactors

Indexed keywords

CELLOBIOSE; CELLULOLYTIC ENZYME; CELLULOSE CONVERSION; CELLULOSE DEGRADATION; CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS; CONVERSION RATES; DILUTION RATE; ENZYMATIC CELLULOSE; ENZYME STABILITY; GLUCOSE CONCENTRATION; HYDROLYSIS KINETICS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; LITERATURE DATA; MEMBRANE REACTOR; NEW STRATEGY; OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES; OPERATIONAL FEASIBILITY; PRODUCT INHIBITION; REACTION CONDITIONS; REACTOR DESIGNS;

BAST FIBERS; BIOREACTORS; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; DEGRADATION; DESIGN; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; ENZYMES; ETHANOL; GLUCOSE; LIGNIN; MEMBRANES;

ENZYME INHIBITION;

CELLOBIOSE; CELLULASE; ENZYME INHIBITOR; GLUCOSE; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE;

BIOREACTOR; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; INHIBITION; REACTION KINETICS;

ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BACTERIAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOREACTOR; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYME ACTIVATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW;

BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; BIOREACTORS; CELLOBIOSE; CELLULASES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME INHIBITORS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

CELLULOSE; DEGRADATION; DESIGN; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; ENZYMES; ETHANOL; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; INHIBITION; LIGNINS; MEMBRANES;

EID: 77949567647     PISSN: 07349750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.02.005     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Ahmed F., Stein A., and Lye G.J. In-situ product removal to enhance the yield of biocatalytic reactions with competing equilibria: α-glucosidase catalysed synthesis of disaccharides. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76 (2001) 971-977
2. Alfani F., Albanesi D., Cantarella M., Scardi V., and Vetromile A. Kinetics of enzymatic saccharification of cellulose in a flat-membrane reactor. Biomass 2 (1982) 245-253
3. Alfani F., Cantarella M., and Scardi V. Use of a membrane reactor for studying enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. J Membr Sci 16 (1983) 407-416
4. Andrić P., Meyer A.S., Jensen P.A., and Dam-Johansen K. Effect and modeling of glucose inhibition and in situ glucose removal during enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160 (2010) 280-297
5. Andrić P., Jensen P.A., Meyer A.S., and Dam-Johansen K. Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis: I. Significance and mechanism of glucose inhibition on cellulolytic enzymes (2010) 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.003
6. Bélafi-Bakó K., Koutinas A., Nemestóthy N., Gubicza L., and Webb C. Continuous enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis in a tubular membrane bioreactor. Enzyme Microb Technol 38 (2006) 155-161
7. Bezerra R.M.F., and Dias A.A. Enzymatic kinetic of cellulose hydrolysis. Inhibition by ethanol and cellobiose. Appl Biochem Biotechol 126 (2005) 49-59
8. Cabrera-Padilla R.Y., Pinto G.A., Giordano R.L.C., and Giordano R.C. A new conception of enzymatic membrane reactor for the production of whey hydrolysates with low contents of phenylalanine. Process Biochem 44 (2009) 269-276
9. Cantarel B.L., Coutinho P.M., Rancurel C., Bernard T., Lombard V., and Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37 (2009) D233-D238
10. Cardona C.A., and Sanchez O.J. Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour Technol 98 (2007) 2415-2457
11. Cauwenberg V., Vergossen P., Stankiewicz A., and Kierkels H. Integration of reaction and separation in manufacturing of pharmaceuticals: membrane-mediated production of S-Ibuprofen. Chem Eng Sci 54 (1999) 1473-1477
12. Chekhova E., Barton P.-I., and Gorak A. Optimal operation processes of discrete-continuous biochemical processes. Comput Chem Eng 24 (2000) 1167-1173
13. Decker C.H., Visser J., and Schreier P. β-Glucosidase multiplicity from Aspergillus tubingensis CBS 643.92: purification and characterization of four β-glucosidases and their differentiation with respect to substrate specificity, glucose inhibitin and acid tolerance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55 (2001) 157-163
14. Drioli E. Membrane reactors. Chem Eng Process 43 (2004) 1101-1102
15. Frenneson I., Trägårdh G., and Hahn-Hägerdal B. An ultrafiltration membrane reactor for obtaining experimental reaction rates at defined concentrations of inhibiting sugars during enzymatic saccharification of alkali-pretreated sallow: formulation of a simple empirical rate equation. Biotechnol Bioeng 27 (1985) 1328-1334
16. Frieden E., and Walter C. Prevalence and significance of the product inhibition of enzymes. Nature 198 (1963) 834-837
17. Fullbrook P.D. Practical limits and prospects (kinetics). In: Godfrey T., and West S. (Eds). Industrial Enzymology 2nd Ed. (1996), MacMillan Press Ltd, London UK 505-540
18. Gan Q., Allen S.J., and Taylor G. Design and operation of an integrated membrane reactor for enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Biochem Eng J 12 (2002) 223-229
19. Gan Q., Allen S.J., and Taylor G. Kinetic dynamics in heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: an overview, an experimental study and mathematical modeling. Process Biochem 38 (2003) 1003-1018
20. Ghose T.K. Continuous enzymatic saccharification of cellulose with culture filtrates of Trichoderma viride QM 6a. Biotechnol Bioeng 11 (1969) 239-261
21. Ghose T.K., and Kostick J.A. A model for continuous enzymatic saccharification of cellulose with simultaneous removal of glucose syrup. Biotechnol Bioeng 12 (1970) 921-946
22. Giorno L., and Drioli E. Biocatalytic membrane reactors: applications and perspectives. Trends Biotechnol 18 (2000) 339-349
23. Gusakov A.V., Sinitsyn A.P., and Klyosov A.A. Factors affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in batch and continuous reactors: computer simulation and experiment. Biotechnol Bioeng 40 (1987) 663-671
24. Hahn-Hägerdal B., Andersson E., López-Leiva M., and Mattiasson B. Membrane biotechnology, co-immobilization, and aqueous two-phase systems: alternatives in bioconversion of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 11 (1981) 651-661
25. Hahn-Hägerdal B., Galbe M., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F., Liden G., and Zacchi G. Bio-ethanol - the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol 24 (2006) 549-556
26. Henley R.G., Yang R.Y.K., and Greenfield P.F. Enzymatic saccharification of cellulose in membrane reactors. Enzyme Microb Technol 2 (1980) 206-208
27. Hong J., Tsao G.T., and Wankat P.C. Membrane reactor for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellobiose. Biotechnol Bioeng 23 (1981) 1501-1506
28. Ishihara M., Uemura S., Hayashi N., and Shimizu K. Semicontinuous enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocelluloses. Biotechnol Bioeng 37 (1991) 948-954
29. Kinoshita S., Chua J.W., Kato N., Yoshida T., and Taguchi H. Hydrolysis of cellulose by cellulases of Sporotrichum cellulophilum in an ultrafilter membrane reactor. Enzyme Microb Technol 8 (1986) 691-695
30. Klei H.E., Sundstrom D.W., Coughlin R.W., and Ziolkowski K. Hollow-fiber enzyme reactors in cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium 11 (1981) 593-601
31. Knutsen J.S., and Davis R.H. Cellulase retention and sugar removal by membrane ultrafiltration during lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 113-116 (2004) 585-599
32. Kuroiwa T., Izuta H., Nabetani H., Nakajima M., Sato S., Mukataka S., et al. Selective and stable production of physiologically active chitosan oligosaccharides using an enzymatic membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem 44 (2009) 283-287
33. Lee Y.-H., and Fan L.T. Kinetic studies of enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose: (II). Analysis of extended hydrolysis times. Biotechnol Bioeng 25 (1983) 939-966
34. Lee S.-G., and Kim H.-S. Optimal operating policy of the ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 42 (1993) 737-746
35. Levenspiel O. The chemical reactor omnibook (1993), OSU Book Stores, Inc., Cortvallis, Oregon
36. Levenspiel O. Chemical reaction engineering. Third edition (1999), John Wiley & Sons Inc
37. Lynd L.R., Laser M.S., Bransby D., Dale B.E., Davison B., Hamilton R., et al. How biotech can transform biofuels. Nat Biotechnol 26 (2008) 169-172
38. Meng F., Chae S.-R., Drews A., Kraume M., Shin H.-S., and Yang F. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBR): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43 (2009) 1489-1512
39. Merino S.T., and Cherry J. Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. Adv Biochem Engin/Biotechnol 108 (2007) 95-120
40. Mores W.D., Knutsen J.S., and Davis R.H. Cellulase recovery via membrane filtration. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 91-93 (2001) 297-309
41. Ohlson I., Trägårdh G., and Hahn-Hägerdal B. Enzymatic hydrolysis of sodium-hydroxide-pretreated sallow in an ultrafiltration membrane reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 26 (1984) 647-653
42. Philippidis G.P., Smith T.K., and Wyman C.E. Study of the enzymatic hydrolysis for production of fuel ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Biotechnol Bioeng 41 (1993) 846-853
43. Pinelo M., Jonsson G., and Meyer A.S. Review: Membrane technology for purification of enzymatically produced oligosaccharides: molecular features affecting performance. Sep Pur 70 (2009) 1-11
44. Riebel B.R., and Bommarius A.S. Biocatalysis, enzyme reaction engineering (2004), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 91-134
45. Rosgaard L., Pedersen S., Cherry J.R., Harris P., and Meyer A.S. Efficiency of new fungal cellulase systems in boosting enzymatic degradation of barley straw lignocellulose. Biotechnol Progr 22 (2006) 493-498
46. Rosgaard L., Andrić P., Dam-Johansen K., Pedersen S., and Meyer A.S. Effects of substrate loading on enzymatic hydrolysis and viscosity of pretreated barley straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 143 (2007) 27-40
47. Rosgaard L., Pedersen S., Langston J., Akerhielm D., Cherry J.R., and Meyer A.S. Evaluation of minimal Trichoderma reesei cellulase mixtures on differently pretreated barley straw substrate. Biotechnol Progr 23 (2007) 1270-1276
48. Roychoudhury P.K., Ghose T.K., Ghosh P., and Chotani G.K. Vapor liquid equilibrium behaviour of aqueous ethanol solution during vacuum coupled simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 23 (1986)
49. Roychoudhury P.K., Ghose T.K., and Ghosh P. Operational strategies in vacuum-coupled SSF for conversion of lignocellulose to ethanol. Enzyme Microb Technol 14 (1992) 581-585
50. Sarbatly R., Krishnaiah D., and England R. Continuous recycle enzymatic membrane reactor system for in situ production of pure and sterile glucose solution. J Appl Sci 7 (2007) 1063-1068
51. Sonia K.G., Chadha B.S., Badhan A.K., Saini H.S., and Bhat M.K. Identification of glucose tolerant acid active β-glucosidases from thermophilic and thermotolerant fungi. World Microbiol Biotechnol 24 (2008) 599-604
52. Sun Y.-M., and Khang S.-J. Catalytic membrane for simultaneous chemical reaction and separation applied to a dehydrogenation reaction. Ind Eng Chem Res 27 (1988) 1136-1142
53. Tjerneld F., Persson I., and Albertsson P.-Å. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in aqueous two-phase systems. II. Semicontinous conversion of a model substrate, Solca Floc BW 200. Biotechnol Bioeng 27 (1985) 1044-1050
54. Wyman C. Cellulose bioconversion technology: the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Model formulation. Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization (1996), Taylor & Francis 265-266
55. Xiao Z., Zhang X., Gregg D.J., and Saddler J.N. Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and β-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechol 113-116 (2004) 1115-1126
56. Yang S., Ding W., and Chen H. Enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw in a tubular reactor coupled with UF membrane. Process Biochem 41 (2006) 721-725