A review of the evidence underpinning the use of visual and auditory feedback for computer technology in post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 465-472

  Parker, Jack ^a   Mountain, Gail ^b   Hammerton, Jackie ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

feedback; rehabilitation; Stroke; technology

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DISABILITY; HEARING; HOME CARE; HUMAN; PATHOLOGY; SELF HELP; SENSORY FEEDBACK; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HEARING; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; SELF-HELP DEVICES; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 79958242722     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2011.556209     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R. Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:182-187 (Pubitemid 46097543)
2. Department of Health. National Stroke Strategy, 2007. Crown Copyright. London. http://www.dh.gov.uk/dr-consum- dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/documents/ digitalasset/dh-081059. pdf. Last accessed 4 February 2011
3. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C, Wellwood I, Langhorne P. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004;35: 2529-2539
4. Pollock A, Baer G, Pomeroy V, Langhorne P. Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;1:CD001920
5. CSP. A new ambition for stroke. A consultation on national strategy response from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy; October 2007
6. Reducing Brain Damage: Faster access to better stroke care. 2005. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. HC 452 Session 2005-2006. London: National Audit Office
7. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-121 (Pubitemid 351287594)
8. Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:52-61 (Pubitemid 46651524)
9. Mountain GA, Ware PM, Hammerton J, Mawson SJ, Zheng J, Davies R, Black N, Zhou H, Hu H, Harris N, Eccleston. The SMART project: a user led approach to developing applications for domiciliary stroke rehabilitation. In: Clarkson P, Langdon J, Robinson P, editors. Designing accessible technology. London: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp 135-144
10. Mountain G, Wilson S, Eccleston C, Mawson S, Hammerton J, Ware T, Zheng H, Davies R, Black N, Harris N, Stone T, Hu H. Developing and testing a telerehabilitation system for people following stroke: issues of usability. J Eng Des 2010; 21:223-236
11. Parker J, Mountain GA, Hammerton J. An investigation into stroke patients' utilisation of feedback from computer-based technology. In: Langdon P, Clarkson J, Robinson P, editors. Designing inclusive interactions. London: Springer-Verlag; 2010. pp 167-176
12. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidelines for stroke: improving motor control. 3rd ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2008
13. Van Vliet P, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28:831-840
14. Magill RA. Augmented feedback. In: Maghill RA, editor. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. 8th ed. London: McGraw Hill; 2007. pp 331-359
15. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Augmented feedback. Motor learning and performance: a situation-based learning approach. 4th ed. Leeds, UK: Human Kinetics; 2008
16. Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Somatosensory recovery: a longitudinal study of the first 6 months after unilateral stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:293-299 (Pubitemid 47161321)
17. Kreisel SH, Hennerici MG, Bäzner H. Pathophysiology of stroke rehabilitation: the natural course of clinical recovery, use-dependent plasticity and rehabilitative outcome. Cerebrovas Dis 2007;23:243-255 (Pubitemid 46425791)
18. Kalra L, Ratan R. Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2006;38:235-237
19. Richards LG, Stewart KC, Woodbury ML, Senesac C, Cauraugh JH. Movement-dependent stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence. Neuropsychologia 2008;46:3-11
20. Rakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2006;19:84-90
21. Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1213-1223 (Pubitemid 41823745)
22. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:741-754
23. Shumway-Cook AWM, Woollacott M. Motor control. Translating research into clinical practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, London: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007
24. Ballinger C, Ashburn A, Low J, Roderick P. Unpacking the black box of therapy - a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:301-309 (Pubitemid 29371560)
25. DeJong G, Horn SD, Gassaway JA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MP. Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the ''black box'' of rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:678-686 (Pubitemid 38881060)
26. Hartvelt A, Hegarty JR. Augmented feedback and physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapy 1996;82:480-490 (Pubitemid 26290043)
27. Wohlin-Wottrich AW, Stenstrom CH, Engardt M, Tham K, Von Koch L. Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1198-1205 (Pubitemid 39335151)
28. Anderson C, Rubenach S, Mhurchu CN, Clark M, Spencer C, Windsor A. Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? Results of a randomized controlled trial. I. Health outcomes at 6 months. Stroke 2000;31:1024-1031 (Pubitemid 30253521)
29. Saka Ö , Serra V, Samyshkin Y, McGuire A, Wolfe C. Cost- Effectiveness of stroke care followed by early supported discharge. Stroke 2009;40:24-29
30. Legg L, Langhorne P, Drummond AE, Gladmann JR, Logan PA, Walker MF. Rehabilitation services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2004;363:352-356 (Pubitemid 38169540)
31. Early supported discharge trialists: services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke clients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;2:CD000443
32. Outpatients service trialists' collaboration: therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke clients at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;1:CD002925. DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD002925
33. Langhorne P, Taylor G, Murray G, Dennis M, Anderson C, Bautz-Holter E, Dey P, Indredavik B, Mayo N, Power M, Rodgers H, Ronning OM, Rudd A, Suwanwela N, Widen- Holmqvist L, Wolfe C. Early supported discharge services for stroke clients: a meta-analysis of individual patients' data. Lancet 2005;365:501-506 (Pubitemid 40215733)
34. Disler PB, Wade DT. Should all stroke rehabilitation be home based? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:733-735 (Pubitemid 37022525)
35. Jones F. Strategies to enhance chronic disease self-management: how can we apply this to stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28:841-847
36. The Royal Society. Digital healthcare: the impact of information and communication technologies on health and healthcare. London: The Royal Society; 2006
37. Liebermann DG, Buchman AS, Franks IM. Enhancement of motor rehabilitation through the use of information technologies. Clin Biomech 2006;21:8-20 (Pubitemid 41728086)
38. The Smart Consortium 2009. http://www.thesmartconsortium. org/Smart-2/index.php. Last accessed January 2010
39. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, Sütbeyaz S, Bussmann JB, KÖseoglu F, Atay MB, Stam HJ. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89:393-398 (Pubitemid 351273169)
40. Piron L, Tombolini P, Turolla A, Zucconi C, Agostini M, Dam M, Santarello G, Piccione F, Tonin P. Reinforced feedback in virtual environment facilitates the arm recovery in patients after a recent stroke. IEEE Virtual Rehabil 2007;September:121-123
41. Gilmore PE, Spaulding SJ. Motor learning and the use of videotape feedback after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007; 14:28-36 (Pubitemid 47417829)
42. Maulucci RA, Eckhouse RH. Retraining reaching in chronic stroke with real-time auditory feedback. Neurorehabilitation 2001;16:171-182 (Pubitemid 33079049)
43. Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) 2009. Homepage: Oxford; Learning & Development Public Health Resource Unit. http://www.phru.nhs.uk/ Doc-Links/ rct%20appraisal%20tool.pdf. Last accessed November 2009
44. Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL. The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain 2009;132:1693-1710
45. Sawner K, Lavigne J. Brunnstrom's movement therapy in hemiplegia: a neurophysiological approach. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1992
46. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987;67:206-207 (Pubitemid 17026064)
47. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FJ. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987;1:6-18
48. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind, S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 1975; 975:13-31
49. Klein RM, Bell B. Self-care skills: behavioral measurement with Klein-Bell ADL scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63:335-338 (Pubitemid 12081949)
50. Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990;57:82-87
51. Cirstea CM, Levin MF. Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:398-411 (Pubitemid 47246436)
52. Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF. Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 2006;37: 1237-1242 (Pubitemid 43731869)
53. Mount J, Pierce SR, Parker J, DiEgidio R, Woessner R, Spiegel L. Trial and error versus errorless learning of functional skills in patients with acute stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 2007;22:123-132 (Pubitemid 47094008)
54. Ezekiel HJ, Lehto NK, Marley TL, Wishart LR, Lee TD. Application of motor learning principles: the physiotherapy client as a problem-solver III augmented feedback. Physiother Can 2001;53:33-39
55. Talvitie U. Socio-affective characteristics and properties of extrinsic feedback in physiotherapy. Physiother Res Int 2000; 5:173-188
56. Talvite U, Reunanen M. Interaction between physiotherapists and patients in stroke rehabilitation. Physiotherapy 2002; 88:77-88 (Pubitemid 34177112)
57. Orrell AJ, Eves FF, Masters RSW. Motor learning of a dynamic balancing task after stroke: implicit implications for stroke rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2006;86:369-380
58. Schmidt RA, Wulf G. Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: implications for training and simulation. Hum Factors 1997;39:509-525 (Pubitemid 127466588)
59. Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 2007;93:96-101 (Pubitemid 47497367)
60. Wulf G. Facilitating independence, motivation and motor learning. Physiotherapy 2007;93:87-88
61. Johnson MJ, Feng X, Johnson LM, Winters JM. Potential of a suite of robot/computer-assisted motivating systems for personalized, home-based, stroke rehabilitation. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2007;4:6
62. Siekierka EM, Eng K, Bassetti C, Blickenstorfer A, Cameirao, MS, Dietz V, Duff A, Erol F, Ettlin T, Hermann DM, Keller T, Keisker B, Kesselring J, Kleiser R, Kollias S, Kool JP, Kurre A, Mangold S, Nef T, Pyk P, Riener R, Schuster C, Tosi F, Verschure PFMJ, Zimmerli L. New technologies and concepts for rehabilitation in the acute phase of stroke: a collaborative matrix. Neurodegener Dis 2007; 4:57-69 (Pubitemid 46586561)
63. Timmermans AAA, Seelen HAM, Willmann RD, Kingma H. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2009;6:1