Motor learning and the use of videotape feedback after stroke

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 28-36

  Gilmore, Paula E ^a   Spaulding, Sandi J ^b  

^a Bluewater Health   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cerebral vascular event; Feedback; Motor learning; Occupational therapy; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; VIDEOTAPE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOFEEDBACK (PSYCHOLOGY); CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 34548677994     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1405-28     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Schmidt RA. Motor Control and Learning, 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books; 1988.
2. Sabari JS. Motor learning concepts applied to activity-based intervention with adults with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:523-530.
3. Majsak MJ. Application of motor learning principles to the stroke population. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1996; 3:27-59.
4. Schmidt RA. Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books; 1991.
5. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
6. Sage GH. Motor Learning and Control: A Neuropsychological Approach. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Publishers; 1984.
7. Rothwell JC, Traub MM, Day BL, et al. Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain. 1982; 105:515-542.
8. Cooper LK, Rothstein AL. Videotape replay and the learning of skills in open and closed environments. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1981;52:91-199.
9. Carr JH, Shepheard RB. A motor learning model for rehabilitation. In: Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Gordon J, Held AM, eds. Movement Science:Foundations for Physical Therapy Rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen; 1987:31-91.
10. Gentile AM. Skill acquisition: Action, movement and neuromotor processes. In: Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Gordon J, Gentile AM, Held JM, eds. Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen; 1987:93-154.
11. Zelaznik HN, Hawkins B, Kisselburgh L. Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. J Motor Behav. 1983;18:353-372.
12. Darden GF. Videotape feedback for student learning and performance: a learning-stages approach. J Phys Education Recreation Dance. 1999;70:40-45.
13. Lee TD, Swinnen SP, Serrien, DJ. Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest. 1994;46:328-344.
14. Jambor E, Weekes E. Video-tape feedback: make it effective. J Phys Education Recreation Dance. 1995; 66:48-50.
15. Hall EG, Erffmeyer, ES. The effect of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal with videotape modeling on free throw accuracy of intercollegiate female basketball players. J Sport Psychol. 1983;5:343-346.
16. Gray SW. Effect of visuomotor rehearsal with video-taped modeling on racquetball performance of beginning players. Percept Motor Skills. 1990;70:379-385.
17. Poretta DL, Surburg PR, Gillespie, MG. Use of various instructional methods for enhancing gross motor skill acquisition in students with moderate mental retardation. Clin Kinesiology. 1999;53:63-68.
18. Hochstenbach J, Mulder T. Neuropsychology and the relearning of motor skills following stroke. Intl J Rehabil Res. 1999;22:11-19.
19. Denton PL. Teaching interpersonal skills with video-tape. Occup Ther Ment Health. 1982;2:17-34.
20. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Health; 2000.
21. Masden JC. The localization of lesions affecting the cerebral hemispheres. In: Brazis PW, Masden JC, Biller J, eds. Localization of Clinical Neurology. Boston: Little, Brown & Co; 1985:301-359.
22. Trombly CA, Wu C-Y. Effect of rehabilitation tasks on organization of movement after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:333-344.
23. Anthony J, LeResche L, Niaz U, et al. Limits of the "Mini-Mental State" as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients. Psychol Med. 1982;12:397-408.
24. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Residency. 1975;12:189-198.
25. Klein RW, Bell BJ. Self-care skills: behavioral management with Klein-Bell ADL Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:335-338.
26. Law M, Letts L. A critical review of scales of daily living. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43:522-528.
27. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 3rd ed. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications; 1998.
28. McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, et al. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67: 22-30.
29. Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: results of pilot testing. Can J Occup Ther. 1994;61:191-197.
30. Poole JL. Application of motor learning principles in occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:531-537.
31. Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SC, et al. Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through video-tape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997;68:269-279.
32. McCallister SG, Napper-Owen G. Observation and analysis of skills of student teachers in physical education. Phys Educator. 1999;56:19-32.
33. Kielhofner G. Conceptual Foundations for Occupational Therapy. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1992.
34. Ferguson JM, Trombly CA. The effect of added-purpose and meaningful occupation on motor learning. Am J Occup Ther. 1997;51:508-515.
35. Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987; 50:177-182.