An investigation into stroke patients' utilisation of feedback from computerbased technology

Designing Inclusive Interactions: Inclusive Interactions Between People and Products in Their Contexts of Use

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 167-176

  Parker, J ^a   Mountain, G A ^b   Hammerton, J ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958204862     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84996-166-0_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Ballinger C, Ashburn A, Low J, Roderick P (1999) Unpacking the black box of therapy - A pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 13: 301-309.
2. CSP (2007) A new ambition for stroke. A consultation on national strategy response from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. London, UK.
3. DeJong G, Horn SD, Gassaway JA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MP (2004) Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the "black box" of rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85: 678-86.
4. DH (2007) National stroke strategy. Department of Health, Crown Copyright, London, UK.
5. Guba, EG, Lincoln YS (2005) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds.) The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, US.
6. Hartvelt A, Hegarty JR (1996) Augmented feedback and physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapy, 82(8): 480-490.
7. Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M (2007) Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 14: 52-61.
8. rd edn. Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
9. Johnson MJ, Feng X, Johnson LM, Winters JM (2007) Potential of a suite of robot/computer-assisted motivating systems for personalized, home-based, stroke rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 4(6).
10. Jones F (2006) Strategies to enhance chronic disease self-management: how can we apply this to stroke? Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(13): 841-847.
11. Kemna S, Culmer PR, Jackson AE, Makower S, Gallagher JF, Holt R et al. (2009) Developing a user interface for the iPAM stroke rehabilitation system. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR 2009), Kyoto, Japan.
12. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI (2008) Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 22: 111-121.
13. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C et al. (2004) Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: A meta-analysis. Stroke, 35: 2529-2539.
14. Liebermann DG, Buchman AS, Franks IM (2006) Enhancement of motor rehabilitation through the use of information technologies. Clinical Biomechanics, 21: 8-20.
15. Magill RA (2007) Augmented feedback. In: Magill RA (ed.) Motor learning and control: concepts and applications, 8th edn. McGraw Hill, London, UK.
16. Mountain GA, Mawson SJ, Hammerton J, Ware PM, Zheng J, Davies R et al. (2010) Exploring the usability of a prototype technology for upper limb rehabilitation following stroke. Journal of Engineering Design (in press).
17. Mountain GA, Ware PM, Hammerton J, Mawson SJ, Zheng J, Davies R et al. (2006) The SMART project: A user led approach to developing applications for domiciliary stroke rehabilitation. In: Clarkson PJ, Langdon J, Robinson P (eds.) Designing accessible technology. Springer, London, UK.
18. Pollock A, Baer G, Pomeroy V, Langhorne P (2007) Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1.
19. rd edn. BMJ Books, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.
20. rd edn. BMJ Books, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.
21. The SMART Consortium (2008) Available at: www.thesmartconsortium.org (Accessed on 10 January 2009).
22. Timmermans AAA, Seelen HAM, Willmann, Kingma H (2009) Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6(1).
23. Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J et al. (2006) Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: A review of available data. European Journal of Neurology, 13(6): 581-598.
24. Van Vliet P, Wulf G (2006) Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(13-14): 831-840.
25. Willmann RD, Lanfermann G, Saini P, Timmermans A, te Vrugt J, Winter S (2007) Home stroke rehabilitation for the upper limbs. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 4015-4017.
26. Wohlin-Wottrich AW, Stenstrom CH, Engardt M, Tham K, Von Koch L (2004) Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(20): 1198-1205.
27. rd edn. SAGE Publications, London, UK.
28. Zhou H, Hu H, Tao Y (2006) Inertial measurements of upper limb motion. Journal of Medicine, Biological Engineering and Computing, 44: 479-87.