Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 435-441

  Shukla, Dhaval ^a   Devi, B Indira ^a   Agrawal, Amit ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND NEUROSCIENCES   (India)

^b MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Disability; Neuropsychological assessment; Outcome scales; Rehabilitation; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BARTHEL INDEX; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMMUNITY INTEGRATION QUESTIONNAIRE; CONTROLLED ORAL WORD ASSOCIATION; CRAIG HANDICAP ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING TECHNIQUE; DATA EXTRACTION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISABILITY RATING SCALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS EXAMINATION; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; GROOVED PEGBOARD; HUMAN; MEDLINE; NEUROBEHAVIORAL FUNCTIONAL INVENTORY; NEUROBEHAVIOURAL FUNCTION INVENTORY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DISEASE; QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER BRAIN INJURY; RANCHO LEVEL OF COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING SCALE; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; REY COMPLEX FIGURE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYMBOL DIGIT MODALITY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VALIDITY;

BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HUMANS; INDEPENDENT LIVING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79958122797     PISSN: 03038467     EISSN: 18726968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.013     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Gururaj G, Kolluri SVR, Chandramouli BA, Subbakrishna DK, Kraus JF. Traumatic brain injury. Bangalore, India: National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Publication No. 61; 2005.
2. Dikmen SS, Machamer JE, Miller B, Doctor J, Temkin N. Functional status examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2001;18:127-40. (Pubitemid 32173422)
3. Jennett B. Development of Glasgow Coma and Outcome Scales. Nepal J Neurosci 2005;2:24-8.
4. Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:285-93. (Pubitemid 11070501)
5. Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, Belleza T, Cope DN. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:118-23. (Pubitemid 12190593)
6. Dijkers MP, Kropp GC, Esper RM, Yavuzer G, Cullen N, Bakdalieh Y. Reporting on reliability and validity of outcome measures in medical rehabilitation research. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:819-27. (Pubitemid 35378802)
7. Dijkers M, Greenwald B. Functional assessment in TBI rehabilitation. In: Zasler ND, Katz DI, Zafonte RD, editors. Brain injury medicine. New York: Principles and Practice Demos Medical Publishing; 2007. p. 225-45.
8. Reilly PL, Bullock R. Head injury pathophysiology and management. 2nd ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2005. p. 444.
9. World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
10. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81-4.
11. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow outcome scale and the extended Glasgow outcome scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:573-85.
12. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD State Med J 1965;14:61-5.
13. Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ. The Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale as prognostic tools for long-term outcomes after stroke: a qualitative review of the literature. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;July (23):1627-36. (Pubitemid 47122172)
14. McPherson KM, Pentland B. Disability in patients following traumatic brain injury - which measure? Int J Rehabil Res 1997;March (20):1-10.
15. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielesny M, Sherwin FS. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986;1:59-74.
16. Granger CV. The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:235-40. (Pubitemid 28207108)
17. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Granger CV. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Rehabil 1993;74:566-73.
18. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Rehabil 1994;75:127-32.
19. Granger CV, Cotter AS, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC, Hens MM. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Rehabil 1990;71:870-5. (Pubitemid 20352470)
20. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Granger CV, Kayton RM. Interrater agreement of the seven-level functional independence measure (FIM). Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:790 [abstract].
21. Hall KM, Mann N, High W, Wright J, Kreutzer J, Wood D. Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: ceiling effects of FIM, FIM + FAM, DRS and CIQ. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1996;11(5):27-39. (Pubitemid 26385881)
22. Hall KM. The functional assessment measure. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas 1997;1:63-5.
23. Hawley CA, Taylor R, Hellawell DJ, Pentland B. Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM + FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;67:749-54.
24. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:519-26.
25. Cusick CP, Gerhart KA, Mellick DC. Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000;15:739-49. (Pubitemid 30127029)
26. Cusick CP, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. The use of proxies in community integration research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1018-24. (Pubitemid 32744326)
27. Cusick CP, Gerhart KA, Mellick D, Breese P, Towle V, Whiteneck GG. Evaluation of the home and community-based services brain injury Medicaid waiver programme in Colorado. Brain Inj 2003;17:931-45. (Pubitemid 37314023)
28. Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazic B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:367-74. (Pubitemid 32199569)
29. Zhang L, Abreu BC, Gonzales V, Seale G, Masel B, Ottenbacher KJ. Comparison of the community integration questionnaire, the Craig handicap assessment and reporting technique, and the disability rating scale in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2002;17:497-509. (Pubitemid 35365124)
30. Mellick D, Gerhart KA, Whiteneck GG. Understanding outcomes based on the post-acute hospitalization pathways followed by persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2003;17:55-71. (Pubitemid 36118872)
31. Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:75-87. (Pubitemid 23209406)
32. O'Neill J, Hibbard MR, Brown M, Jaffe M, Sliwinski M, Vandergoot D, et al. The effect of employment on quality of life and community integration after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1998;13:68-79. (Pubitemid 28419874)
33. Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay J, Friel JC. Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:943-50. (Pubitemid 38881022)
34. Seale GS, Caroselli JS, High Jr WM, Becker CL, Neese LE, Scheibel R. Use of community integration questionnaire (CIQ) to characterize changes in functioning for individuals with traumatic brain injury who participated in a post-acute rehabilitation programme. Brain Inj 2002;16:955-67. (Pubitemid 35331087)
35. Paniak C, Phillips K, Toller-Lobe G, Durand A, Nagy J. Sensitivity of three recent questionnaires to mild traumatic brain injury: related effects. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1999;14(3):211-9. (Pubitemid 29281206)
36. Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: a review of community integration questionnaire studies. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1997;12:74-91. (Pubitemid 28033461)
37. Hagen C, Malkmus D, Durham P. Levels of cognitive functioning. Downey (CA): Rancho Los Amigos Hospital; 1972.
38. Gouvier WD, Blanton PD, LaPorte KK, Nepomuceno C. Reliability and validity of the disability rating scale and the levels of cognitive functioning scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:94-7. (Pubitemid 17017759)
39. Rao N, Kilgore KM. Predicting return to work in traumatic brain injury using assessment scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:911-6.
40. Rappaport M, Herrero-Backe C, Rappaport ML, Winterfield K. Head injury outcome up to ten years later. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:885-92. (Pubitemid 20031372)
41. Eliason MR, Topp BW. Predictive validity of Rappaport's disability rating scale in subjects with acute brain dysfunction. Phys Ther 1984;64:1357-60. (Pubitemid 14030754)
42. Hall KM, Hamilton B, Gordon WA, Zasler ND. Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: disability rating scale. Functional independence measure and functional assessment measure. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:60-74. (Pubitemid 23209405)
43. Bowers D, Kofroth L, Comparison:. Disability rating scale and functional independence measure during recovery from traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:A58.
44. Bullock MR, Merchant RE, Choi SC, Gilman CB, Kreutzer JS, Marmarou A, et al. Outcome measures for clinical trials in neurotrauma. Neurosurg Focus 2002;13(Article 1) [accessed 28.04.10].
45. Dikmen SS, Machamer JE, Powell JM, Temkin NR. Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1449-57. (Pubitemid 37237252)
46. Hudak AM, Caesar RR, Frol AB, Krueger K, Harper CR, Temkin NR, et al. J Neurotrauma 2005;22:1319-26.
47. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet 1975;1:480-4.
48. Pettigrew EL, Wilson JT, Teasdale G. Assessing disability after head injury: improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurosurg 1998;89:939-43. (Pubitemid 28544047)
49. Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LEL, Wilson JTL, Murray G, Jennett B. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:587-97. (Pubitemid 28413052)
50. Wilson JT, Edwards P, Fiddes H, Stewart E, Teasdale GM. Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 2002;19:999-1005.
51. Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Teasdale GM. Reliability of ratings on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from in-person and telephone structured interviews. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2003;18:252-8. (Pubitemid 36622691)
52. Lu J, Marmarou A, Lapane K, Turf E, Wilson L, et al., IMPACT Group. A method for reducing misclassification in the extended Glasgow outcome score. J Neurotrauma 2010;27:843-52.
53. Kreutzer J, Devany C, Myers S, Marwitz J. Neurobehavioral outcome following traumatic brain injury: implications for cognitive rehabilitation. In: Kreutzer J, Wehman P, editors. Cognitive rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury: a functional approach. Baltimore: Paul Brookes; 1991. p. 55-73.
54. von Steinbuechel N, Petersen C, Bullinger M, QOLIBRI Group. Assessment of health-related quality of life in persons after traumatic brain injury - development of the QOLIBRI, a specific measure. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005;93: 43-9.
55. Truelle JL, von Wild K, Höfer S, Neugebauer E, Lischetzke T, von Steinbüchel N. QOLIBRI group the QOLIBRI - towards a quality of life tool after traumatic brain injury: current developments in Asia. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008;101:125-9.
56. Lee YB, Kwon SJ. A more detailed classification of mild head injury in adults and treatment guidelines. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009;46:451-8.
57. Snell DL, Surgenor LJ, Hay-Smith EJ, Siegert RJ. A systematic review of psychological treatments for mild traumatic brain injury: an update on the evidence. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2009;31:20-38.
58. Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM, Borg J, von Holst H, Holm L, et al. Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the who collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2004;(Suppl. 43):84-105. (Pubitemid 38268224)
59. Petchprapai N, Winkelman C. Mild traumatic brain injury: determinants and subsequent quality of life. A review of the literature. J Neurosci Nurs 2007;39:260-72.