Use of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) to characterize changes in functioning for individuals with traumatic brain injury who participated in a post-acute rehabilitation programme

Brain Injury

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 955-967

  Seale, Gary S ^a   Caroselli, Jerome S ^a   High Jr , Walter M ^a   Becker, Cory L ^a   Neese, Leah E ^a   Scheibel, Randall ^a  

^a Transitional Learning Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BLUNT TRAUMA; BRAIN INJURY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG ABUSE; EMPLOYMENT; FALLING; FAMILY LIFE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HEAD INJURY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT EDUCATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRODUCTIVITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RACE DIFFERENCE; RELIABILITY; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

EID: 0036850284     PISSN: 02699052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699050210155258     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bontke, C. F. and Boake, C.: Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2: 473-482, 1991.
2. Ling, J. S. and Evans, R. W.: The influence of outcome studies on rehabilitation policy. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12: 51-59, 1997.
3. Rosenthal, M.: 1995 Sheldon Berrol, MD senior lectureship: the ethics and efficacy of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation - myths, measurements, and meaning. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11: 88-95, 1996.
4. Corrigan, J. D.: Community integration following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 4: 109-121, 1994.
5. Cope, D. N., Cole, J. R., Hall, K. M. et al.: Brain injury: analysis of outcome in a post-acute rehabilitation system. Part 1: general analysis. Brain Injury, 5: 111-125, 1991.
6. Johnston M. V. and Lewis, F. D.: Outcomes of community re-entry programmes for brain injury survivors. Part 1: independent living and productive activities. Brain Injury, 5: 141-154, 1991.
7. Burke, D. C.: Models of brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 9: 735-743, 1995.
8. Malec, J. F. and Basford, J. S.: Postacute brain injury rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77: 198-207, 1996.
9. Cope, D. N.: The effectiveness of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a review. Brain Injury, 9: 649-670, 1995.
10. Thobaben J. R.: The impact of managed care on the moral character of rehabilitation institutions. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12: 10-20, 1997.
11. Cope D. N., Cole, J. R., Hall, K. M. et al.: Brain injury: analysis of outcome in a post-acute rehabilitation system. Part 2: subanalyses. Brain Injury, 5: 127-139, 1991.
12. High, W. M., Boake, C. and Lehmkuhl L. D.: Critical analysis of studies evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10: 14-26, 1995.
13. Malec, J. F., Smigielski, J. S., Depompolo, R. W. et al.: Outcome evaluation and prediction in a comprehensive-integrated post-acute outpatient brain injury rehabilitation programme. Brain Injury, 7: 15-29, 1993.
14. Johnston, M. V.: Outcomes of community re-entry programmes for brain injury survivors. Part 2: further investigations. Brain Injury, 5: 155-168, 1991.
15. Willer, B., Rosenthal, M., Kreutzer, J. S. et al.: Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8: 75-87, 1993.
16. World Health Organization: International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease (Geneva: World Health Organization), 1993.
17. Dijkers, M.: Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: a review of the Community Integration Questionnaire. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12: 74-91, 1997.
18. Corrigan, J. D. and Deming, R.: Psychometric characteristics of the Community Integration Questionnaire: replication and extension. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10: 41-53, 1995.
19. Sander, A. M., Fuchs, K. L., High, W. M. et al.: The Community Integration Questionnaire revisited: an assessment of factor structure and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80: 1303-1308, 1999.
20. Heinemann, A. W. and Whiteneck, G. G.: Relationships among impairment, disability, handicap, and life satisfaction in persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10: 54-63, 1995.
21. Willer, B., Ottenbacher, K. J. and Coad, M. L.: The Community Integration Questionnaire: a comparative examination. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73: 103-111, 1994.
22. Sander, A. M., Seel, R. T., Kreutzer, J. S. et al.: Agreement between persons with traumatic brain injury and their relatives regarding psychosocial outcome using the Community Integration Questionnaire. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78: 353-357, 1997.
23. Cusick, C. P., Gerhart, K. A. and Mellick, D. C.: Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15: 739-749, 2000.
24. Tepper, S., Beatty, P. and DeJong, G.: Outcomes in traumatic brain injury: self-report versus report of significant others. Brain Injury, 10: 575-581, 1996.
25. Schmidt, M. F., Garvin, L. J., Heinemann, A. W. et al.: Gender- and age-related role changes following brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10: 14-27, 1995.
26. Rosenthal, M., Dijkers, M., Harrison-Felix, C. et al.: Impact of minority status on functional outcome and community integration following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11: 40-57, 1996.
27. Hall, K. M., Mann, N., High, W. M. et al.: Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: ceiling effects of FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS, and CIQ. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11: 27-39, 1996.
28. Willer, B., Button, J. and Rempel, R.: Residential and home-based postacute rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a case control study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80: 399-406, 1999.
29. Jacobson, N. S. and Truax, P.: Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59: 12-19, 1991.
30. Jennett, B. and Teasdale, G.: Management of head injuries. (Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davies), 1981.
31. Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C. and Revenstorf, D.: Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15: 336-352, 1984.
32. Chelune, G. J., Naugle, R. I., Luders, H. et al.: Individual change after epilepsy surgery: practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology, 7: 41-52, 1993.
33. Sawrie, S. M., Chelune, G. J., Naugle, R. I. et al.: Empirical methods for assessing meaningful neuropsychological change following epilepsy surgery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2: 556-564, 1996.
34. Hermann, B. P., Seidenberg, M., Schoenfeld, J. et al.: Empirical techniques for determining the reliability, magnitude, and pattern of neuropsychological change after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia, 37: 942-950, 1996.