Sensitivity of three recent questionnaires to mild traumatic brain injury-related effects

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 211-219

  Paniak, Chris ^a,b   Phillips, Kevin ^a,b   Toller Lobe, Geraldine ^a   Durand, Amy ^a   Nagy, Julianna ^a  

^a GLENROSE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURY; OUTPATIENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 0033048102     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-199906000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alexander MP. Mild traumatic brain injury: Pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical management. Neurology.1995;45:1253-1260.
2. Gualtieri CT. The problem of mild brain injury. Neuropsychiatr Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1995; 8:127-136.
3. Kraus JF, Nourjah P. The epidemiology of mild head injury. In: Levin HS, Eisenberg HM, Benton AL, eds. Mild Head Injury. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1989:8-22.
4. Kay T, Cavallo MM, Ezrachi O, Vavagiakis P. The Head Injury Family Interview: a clinical and research tool. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10:12-31.
5. Willer B, Linn R, Allen K. Community integration and barriers to integration for individuals with brain injury. In: Finlayson MAJ, Garner S. eds. Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Clinical Considerations. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1993, 355-375.
6. Hannay HJ, Ezrachi O, Contant CF, Levin HS. Outcome measures for patients with head injuries: report of the outcome measures subcommittee. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:41-50.
7. Dahmer ER, Shilling MA, Hamilton BB, et al. A model systems database for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:12-25.
8. Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1992.
9. Ware JE, Gandek B, and the International Quality of Life Assessment Project Group. The SF-36 Health Survey: Development and use in mental health research and the International Quality of Life Assessment Project. Int J Ment Health. 1994;23:49-73.
10. Dacey R, Dikmen S, Temkin N, McLean A, Armsden G, Winn H. Relative effects of brain and non-brain injuries on neuropsychological and psychosocial outcome. J Trauma. 1991;31:217-222.
11. Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:75-87.
12. Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The Community Integration Questionnaire: a comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73:103-111.
13. Hall KM, Mann N, High W Jr., Wright J, Kreutzer JS, Wood D. Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: ceiling effects of FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS, and CIQ. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:27-39.
14. Sander AM, Kreutzer JS, Rosenthal M, Delmonico R, Young ME. A multicenter longitudinal investigation of return to work and community integration following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:70-84.
15. Cavallo MM, Kay T, Ezrachi O. Problems and changes after traumatic brain injury: differing perceptions within and between families. Brain Injury. 1992;6: 327-325.
16. Corrigan JD, Smith-Knapp K, Granger CV. Outcomes in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:298-305.
17. Deane M, Pigott T, Dearing P. The value of the Short Form 36 score in the outcome assessment of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Br J Neurosurg. 1996;10: 187-191.
18. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
19. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31: 247-263.
20. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40-66.
21. Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample. Quality Life Res. 1994;3:7-12.
22. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey. I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41:1349-1358.
23. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee, Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:86-87.
24. Kibby MY, Long CJ. Minor head injury: Attempts at clarifying the confusion. Brain Injury. 1996;10:159-186.
25. Paniak C, Toller-Lobe G, Nagy J, Durand A. A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 1998;12:1011-1023.
26. Blishen BR, Carroll WK, Moore C. The 1981 socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. Can Rev Soc Anthropol. 1981;24:465-488.
27. Glass GV. Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.
28. Ruff RM, Levin HS, Mattis S, et al. Recovery of memory after mild head injury, a three center study. In: Levin HS, Eisenberg HM, Benton AL, eds. Mild Head Injury. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1989:176-188.