Functional outcome scales in traumatic brain injury: A comparison of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (extended) and the functional status examination

Journal of Neurotrauma

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1319-1326

  Hudak, Anne M ^a,d   Caesar, R Ruth ^a   Frol, Alan B ^b   Krueger, Kim ^a   Harper, Caryn R ^a   Temkin, Nancy R ^c   Dikmen, Sureyya S ^c   Carlile, Mary ^b   Madden, Christopher ^a   Diaz Arrastia, Ramon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Abbreviated Injury Scale; Functional Status Examination; Glasgow Outcome Scale; Injury Severity Score; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ABBREVIATED INJURY SCALE; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 28244468391     PISSN: 08977151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1319     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BOHAC, D.L., MALEC, J.F., and MOESSNER, A.M. (1997). Factor analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory: structure and validity. Brain Inj. 11, 469-482.
2. CDC (CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION). (1999b). Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States-A Report to Congress. CDC: Atlanta.
3. COMMITTEE ON INJURY SCALING. (1990). The Abbreviated Injury Scale. Committee on Injury Scaling, Association for the Advancement of the Automotive Medicine: Des Platnes, IL.
4. DIKMEN, S.S., MACHAMER, J.E., MILLER, B., DOCTOR, J., and TEMKIN, N. (2001). Functional Status Examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 18, 127-140.
5. DIKMEN, S.S., MACHAMER, J.E., POWELL, J.M., and TEMKIN, N.R. (2003). Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84, 1449-1457.
6. HALL, K.M., BUSHNICK, T., LAKISIC-KAZAZIC, B., WRIGHT, J., and CANTAGALLO, A. (2001). Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community based individuals. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82, 367-374.
7. HAMILTON, B.B., GRANGER, C.G., SHERWIN, F.S., ZIELEZNY, M., and TASHMAN, J.S. (1987). A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation, in: Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. M.J. Fuhrer (ed), P.H. Brooks Publishing: Baltimore, pps. 137-147.
8. JENNETT, B., and BOND, M. (1975). Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet 1, 480-484.
9. KIRKNESS, C. THOMPSON, J., RICKER, B., et al. (2002). The impact of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrage on functional outcome. J. Neurosci. Nurs. 34, 134-141.
10. LEVIN, H., BOAKE, C., SONG, J., et al. (2001). Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 18, 575-584.
11. MARSHALL, L.F., MARSHALL, S.B., KLAUBER, M.R., et al. (1991). A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J. Neurosurg. 75 Suppl. 5, S14-S20.
12. PETTIGREW, E.L., WILSON, J.T., and TEASDALE, G. (1998). Assessing disability after head injury: improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J. Neurosurg. 89, 939-943.
13. PETTIGREW, L.E., WILSON, J.T., and TEASDALE, G.M. (2003). Reliability of ratings on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from in-person and telephone structured interviews. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 18, 252-258.
14. RAPPAPORT, M., HALL, K.M., HOPKINS, K., BELLEZA, T., and COPE, D.N. (1982). Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 63, 118-123.
15. TEASDALE, G.M., PETTIGREW, L.E.L., WILSON, J.T.L., MURRAY, G., and IENNETT, B. (1998). Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J. Neurotrauma 15, 587-597.
16. TEMKIN, N.R., MACHAMER, I.E., and DIKMEN, S.S. (2003). Correlates of functional status 3-5 years after traumatic brain injury with CT abnormalities. J. Neurotrauma 20, 229-241.
17. THURMAN, D.I., ALVERSON, C., DUNN, K., GUERRERO, J., and SNIEZEK, J. (1999). Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 14, 602-615.
18. WILLER, B., KREUTZTER, J.S., and GORDON, W.A. (1993). Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 8, 75-78.
19. WILLIAMS, D.H., LEVIN, H.S., and EISENBERG, H.M. (1990). Mild head injury classification. Neurosurgery 27, 422-428.
20. WILSON, J.T., PETTIGREW, L.E., and TEASDALE, G.M. (1998). Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale. J. Neurotrauma 15, 573-585.
21. WILSON, J.T., EDWARDS, P., FIDDES, H., STEWART, E., and TEASDALE, G.M. (2002). Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J. Neurotrauma 19, 999-1005.
22. WHO (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION). (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: ICF. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland.