The importance of climate, site and management on weed vegetation in oilseed rape in Germany

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 141, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 323-331

  Hanzlik, Kristin ^a   Gerowitt, Bärbel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Indicator species analysis; Integrated weed management; Partial canonical correspondence analysis (pCCA); Partitioning around medoids (PAM); Rarity; Weed survey

Indexed keywords

CANOLA; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FARMING SYSTEM; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; PRECIPITATION INTENSITY; RARE SPECIES; SOIL QUALITY; SOWING; TILLAGE; VEGETATION STRUCTURE; WEED CONTROL;

GERMANY;

BRASSICA NAPUS;

EID: 79958037885     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aavik T., Augenstein I., Bailey D., Herzog F., Zobel M., Liira J. What is the role of local landscape structure in the vegetation composition of field boundaries?. Applied Vegetation Science 2008, 11:375-386.
2. Aitchison J. Classification of agricultural systems. Progress in Agricultural Geography 1986, 38-69. Croom Helm, London, UK. M. Pacione (Ed.).
3. Andersson T., Milberg P. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation and nitrogen. Weed Science 1998, 46:30-38.
4. Andreasen C., Skovgaard I. Crop and soil factors of importance for the distribution of plant species on arable fields in Denmark. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2009, 133:61-67.
5. Andreasen C., Streibig J., Haas H. Soil properties affecting the distribution of 37 weed species in Danish fields. Weed Research 1991, 31:181-187.
6. Bayer Important Crops of the World and Their Weeds 1992, Leverkusen. 2nd ed. A.G. Bayer (Ed.).
7. Borcard D., Legendre P., Drapeau P. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 1992, 73:1045-1055.
8. Bratli H., Okland T., Okland R., Dramstad W., Elven R., Engan G., Fjellstad W., Heegaard E., Pedersen O., Solstad H. Patterns of variation in vascular plant species richness and composition in SE Norwegian agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2006, 114:270-286.
9. Derksen D., Thomas G., Lafond G., Loeppky H., Swanton C. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Science 1993, 41:409-417.
10. Dufrene M., Legendre P. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 1997, 67:345-366.
11. Ekroos J., Hyvönen T., Tiainen J., Tiira M. Responses in plant and carabid communities to farming practises in boreal landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2010, 135:288-293.
12. Ellenberg H. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa 2001, Goltze, Göttingen.
13. Fried G., Chauvel B., Reboud X. A functional analysis of large-scale temporal shifts from 1970 to 2000 in weed assemblages of sunflower crops in France. Journal of Vegetation Science 2009, 20:49-58.
14. Fried G., Norton L.R., Reboud X. Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2008, 128:68-76.
15. Gabriel D., Thies C., Tscharntke T. Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2005, 7:85-93.
16. Goerke K., Richter U., Schulte M., Gerowitt B. Regional distinctions in the weed flora of winter oilseed rape in Germany. Gesunde Pflanzen 2008, 60:151-158.
17. Gower J. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 1971, 27:857-871.
18. Greenacre M.J. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis 1984, Academic Press, London.
19. Gross J. Variance inflation factors. R News 2003, 3(1):13-15.
20. Gurrath P. Landwirtschaft in Deutschland und der Europäischen Union 2009 2009, Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden.
21. Hallgren E., Palmer M., Milberg P. Data diving with cross-validation: an investigation of broad-scale gradients in Swedish weed communities. Journal of Ecology 1999, 87:1037-1051.
22. Heinonen R. Plowing and non-plowing under nordic conditions. Soil & Tillage Research 1991, 21:185-189.
23. Jeanneret P., Schüpbach B., Luka H. Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2003, 98:311-320.
24. Kaufman L., Rousseeuw P.J. Finding Groups in Data 1990, Wiley, New York [u.a.].
25. Kenkel N., Derksen D., Thomas A., Watson P. Review: multivariate analysis in weed science research. Weed Science 2002, 50:281-292.
26. Leeson J., Sheard J., Thomas A. Multivariate classification of farming systems for use in integrated pest management studies. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1999, 79:647-654.
27. Leeson J., Sheard J., Thomas A. Weed communities associated with arable Saskatchewan farm management systems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2000, 80:177-185.
28. Lososová Z., Chytrý M., Cimalová Š., Kropác Z., Otýpková Z., Pyšek P.T.L. Weed vegetation of arable land in central Europe: gradients of diversity and species composition. Journal of Vegetation Science 2004, 15:415-422.
29. Lutman P., Storkey J., Martin H., Holland J. Abundance of weeds in arable fields in southern England in 2007/08. Aspects of Applied Biology 2009, 91:1-6.
30. Marshall E. Distribution patterns of plants associated with arable field edges. Journal of Applied Ecology 1989, 26:247-257.
31. Marshall E., Arnold G. Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning 1995, 31:205-216.
32. Marshall J., Brown V., Boatman N., Lutman P., Squire G. The Impact of Herbicides on Weed Abundance and Biodiversity. PN0940 2001, vol. 134. UK Pesticides Safety.
33. Milberg P., Hallgren E., Palmer M. Interannual variation in weed biomass on arable land in Sweden. Weed Research 2000, 40:311-321.
34. Mulugeta D., Stoltenberg D.E., Boerboom C.M. Weed species-area relationships as influenced by tillage. Weed Science 2001, 49:217-223.
35. Murphy C., Lemerle D. Continuous cropping systems and weed selection. Euphytica 2006, 148:61-73.
36. Økland R. On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. Journal of Vegetation Science 1999, 10:131-136.
37. Poggio S., Satorre E., Fuente d.I.E. Structure of weed communities occurring in pea and wheat crops in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2004, 103:225-235.
38. Pysek P., Jarosik V., Kropac Z., Chytry M., Wild J., Tichy L. Effects of abiotic factors on species richness and cover in central European weed communities. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2005, 109:1-8.
39. Qiang S. Multivatiate analysis, description, and ecological interpretation of weed vegetation in the summer crop fields of Anhui Province, China. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2005, 47:1193-1210.
40. R Core Development Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
41. Ries C. Überblick über die Ackerunkrautvegetation Österreichs und ihre Entwicklung in neuerer Zeit. Dissertationes Botanicae, Band 1992, 187.
42. Roßberg D., Gutsche V., Enzian S., Wick M. NEPTUN 2000-survey into application of chemical pesticides in agricultural practice in Germany. Reports from the Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry 2002, 98.
43. Rydberg N., Milberg P. Survey of weeds in organic farming in Sweden. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 2000, 18:175-185.
44. Šilc U., Vrbničanin S., Božić D., Čarni A., Stevanović Z. Weed vegetation in the north-western Balkans: diversity and species composition. Weed Research 2009, 49:602-612.
45. Storkey J., Moss S., Cussans J. Using assembly theory to explain changes in a weed flora in response to agricultural intensification. Weed Science 2010, 58:39-46.
46. Streit B., Rieger S.B., Stamp P., Richner W. Weed populations in winter wheat as affected by crop sequence, intensity of tillage and time of herbicide application in a cool and humid climate. Weed Research 2003, 43:20-32.
47. Ter Braak C. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetation 1987, 69:69-77.
48. van der Laan M., Pollard K., Bryan J. A new partitioning around medoids algorithm. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 2003, 73(8):575-584.
49. Wagner H. Direct multi-scale ordination with canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 2004, 85:342-351.
50. Wahmhoff W. Integrierter Rapsanbau 2000, Erich-Schmidt-Verlag, Berlin.
51. Wang Z., Chen Y., Chen Y. Functional grouping and establishment of distribution patterns of invasive plants in China using self-organizing maps and indicator species analysis. Archives of Biological Sciences, Belgrade 2009, 61:71-78.
52. Zanin G., Otto S., Riello L., Borin M. Ecological interpretation of weed flora dynamics under different tillage systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 1997, 66:177-188.