Crop and soil factors of importance for the distribution of plant species on arable fields in Denmark

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 133, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 61-67

  Andreasen, Christian ^a   Skovgaard, Ib Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Agro ecosystems; Beta binomial; Biodiversity; Canonical correspondence analysis; Cluster analysis; Countryside survey; Raunki r analysis; Weed management

Indexed keywords

ARABLE LAND; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL VARIATION; WEED CONTROL;

DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 67649313317     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. (2002), J. Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York Section 13.3, pp. 553-559
2. Andreasen C., Jensen J.E., and Streibig J.C. Soil properties and plant nutrients affecting the occurrence of Poa annua, Stellaria media and Viola arvensis on arable land. Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Weeds, vol. 1. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, UK (1991) 395-402
3. Andreasen C., Jensen J.E., and Streibig J.C. Weed communities described by multivariate analysis. Proceedings of the First International Weed Control Congress. 17-21 February 1002, Melbourne, 2, 50-54 (1992), Weed Science Society of Victoria Inc., Melbourne, Australia
4. Andreasen C., Streibig J.C., and Haas H. Soil properties affecting the distribution of 37 weed species in Danish fields. Weed Res. 31 (1991) 181-187
5. Andreasen C., and Stryhn H. Increasing weed flora in Danish arable fields and its importance for biodiversity. Weed Res. 48 (2008) 1-9
6. Andreasen C., Stryhn H., and Streibig J.C. Decline of the flora in Danish arable fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 33 (1996) 619-626
7. Anon., 2006. (accessed date: March 28, 2009).
8. Anon., 2008. The R Manuals. (accessed date: March 28, 2009).
9. Barr A.J., Goodnight J.H., Sail J.P., and Helwin J.T. A User's Guide to SAS 76 (1976), Sparks Press, Raleigh, NC
10. Chapman H.D. Cation exchanges capacity. In: Black C.A. (Ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. 1st ed. (1965), American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin 891-901 No. 9 in the series Agronomy
11. Day P.R. Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. In: Black C.A. (Ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. 1st ed. (1965), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin 545-567
12. Diekmann M. Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology-a review. Basic Appl. Eco. 4 (2003) 493-506
13. Dray S., and Dufour A.B. The ade4 Package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Softw. 22 4 (2007)
14. Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W., and Pualissen D. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. 2nd ed. Scr. Geobot. 18 (1992) 1-248
15. Grundy A.C., Phelps K., Reader R.J., and Burston S. Modelling the germination of Stellaria media using the concept of hydrothermal time. New Phytol. 148 3 (2000) 433-444
16. Hald A.B., and Petersen P.M. Soil and vegetation in two Danish fens following changes in water regime. Nordic J. Bot. 12 (1992) 707-732
17. Heisel T., Ersbøll A.K., and Andreasen C. Annual weed mapping with co-kriging using soil properties. Precis. Agr. 1 (1999) 39-52
18. Jensen E.S. Evaluation of automated-analysis of 15-N and total N in plant-material and soil. Plant Soil 133 1 (1991) 83-92
19. Kenkel N.C., Derksen D.A., Thomas A.G., and Watson P.R. Multivariate analysis in weed science research. Weed Sci. 50 (2002) 281-292
20. Krebs J.R., Wilson J.D., Bradbury R.B., and Siriwardena G.M. The second silent spring?. Nature 400 (1999) 611-612
21. Laursen, F., Haas, H., 1971. Faktorer af betydning for ukrudtsarternes forekomst i danske afgrøder. I. livsvarighedens betydning. Særtryk af NJF-kongressen 1971: Fortrykk av foredrag. Section II. Plantedyrkning.
22. Lesnoff, M., Lancelot, R. 2008. R graphical manual. A collection of R graphics from all R packages. (accessed date: March 28, 2009).
23. Mullverstedt R. Untersuchungen über die Keimung von Unkrautsamen in Abhangigkeit vom Sauerstoffpartialdrück. Weed Res. 3 (1963) 154-163
24. Olsen S.R., Cole C.V., Watanabe F.S., and Dean L.A. Estimation of available phosphate in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate (1954), Department of Circular. No 939, 19. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
25. Otto S., Zuin M.C., Chisté G., and Zanin G. A modeling approach using seed bank and soil properties to predict the relative weed density in organic fields of an Italian pre-alpine valley. Weed Res. 47 4 (2007) 311-326
26. Raunkiær C. The Lifeforms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography (1934), Clarendon Press, Oxford
27. Salonen J. Weed infestation and factors affecting weed incidence in spring cereals in Finland-a multivariate approach. Agric. Sci. Finland 2 6 (1993) 525-536
28. Stace C. New flora of the British Isles (2001), Cambridge University Press, UK
29. Streibig J.C. Numerical methods illustrating the phytosociology of crops in relation to weed flora. J. Appl. Ecol. 16 (1979) 577-587
30. ter Braak C.J.F. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67 (1986) 1167-1179
31. ter Braak C.J.F. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationship by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69 (1987) 69-77
32. Warwick S.I. The biology of Canadian weeds. 37. Poa annua L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59 (1979) 103-106