Multivariate analysis in weed science research

Weed Science

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 281-292

  Kenkel, N C ^a   Derksen, D A ^b   Thomas, A G ^b   Watson, P R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canonical correlation analysis (CANCOR); Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA); Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA); Correspondence analysis (CA); Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS); Ordination analysis; Principal component analysis (PCA)

Indexed keywords

CANONICAL ANALYSIS; DATA SET; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WEED;

EID: 0038234776     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0281:RMAIWS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Bàrberi, P., A. Cozzani, M. Macchia, and E. Bonari. 1998. Size and composition of the weed seedbank under different management systems for continuous maize cropping. Weed Res. 38:319-334.
2. Bàrberi, P., N. Silvestri, and E. Bonari. 1997. Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation. Weed Res. 37:301-313.
3. Benzecri, J.-P. 1992. Correspondence Analysis Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker. 665 p.
4. Bradfield, G. E. and N. C. Kenkel. 1987. Nonlinear ordination using flexible shortest path adjustment of ecological distances. Ecology 68:750-753.
5. Chambers, J. M., W. S. Cleveland, B. Kleiner, and P. A. Tukey. 1983. Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 395 p.
6. Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York: J. Wiley 428 p.
7. Conn, J. S. and J. A. Delapp. 1983. Weed species shifts with increasing field age in Alaska. Weed Sci. 31:520-524.
8. Dale, M.R.T., A. G. Thomas, and E. A. Johns. 1992. Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Can. J. Bot. 70:1931-1939.
9. Del la Fuente, E. B., S. A. Suárez, C. M. Ghersa, and R.J.C. León. 1999. Soybean weed communities: relationships with cultural history and crop yield. Agron. J. 91:234-241.
10. Derksen, D. A., G. P. Lafond, A. G. Thomas, H. A. Loeppky, and C. J. Swanton. 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci. 41:409-417.
11. Derksen, D. A., A. G. Thomas, G. P. Lafond, H. A. Loeppky, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Impact of herbicides on weed community diversity within conservation-tillage systems. Weed Res. 35:311-320.
12. Derksen, D. A., P. R. Watson, and H. A. Loeppky. 1998. Weed community composition in seedbanks, seedlings and mature plant communities in a multi-year trial in western Canada. Asp. Appl. Biol. 41:43-50.
13. Dieleman, J. A., D. A. Mortensen, D. D. Buhler, C. A. Cambardella, and T. B. Moorman. 2000a. Identifying associations among site properties and weed species abundance. I. Multivariate analysis. Weed Sci. 48:567-575.
14. Dieleman, J. A., D. A. Mortensen, D. D. Buhler, and R. B. Ferguson. 2000b. Identifying associations among site properties and weed species abundance. II. Hypothesis generation. Weed Sci. 48:576-587.
15. Digby, P.G.N. and R. A. Kempton. 1987. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities. New York: Chapman and Hall. 206 p.
16. Gabriel, K. R. 1981. Biplot display of multivariate matrices for inspection of data and diagnosis. Pages 147-173 in V. Barnett, ed. Interpreting Multivatiate Data. Chichester: J. Wiley.
17. Gittins, R. 1985. Canonical Analysis: A Review with Applications in Ecology. New York: Springer. 351 p.
18. Goodall, D. W. 1954. Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. II. An essay in the use of factor analysis. Aust. J. Bot. 2:304-324.
19. Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325-338.
20. Green, R. H. 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. New York: J. Wiley. 257 p.
21. Green, R. H. 1993. Relating two sets of variables in environmental studies. Pages 149-163 in G. P. Patil and C. R. Rao, eds. Multivariate Environmental Statistics. New York: Elsevier.
22. Greenacre, M. J. 1984. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. New York: Academic Press. 364 p.
23. Hill, M. O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61:237-249.
24. Hill, M. O. and H. G. Gauch. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47-58.
25. Jackson, D. A. 1993. Stopping rules in principal component analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74:2204-2214.
26. Jackson, D. A. and K. M. Somers. 1991. Putting things in order: the ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis. Am. Nat. 137:704-712.
27. Jeffers, J.N.R. 1978. An Introduction to Systems Analysis: With Ecological Applications. London: University Park Press. 198 p.
28. Jeffers, J.N.R. 1982. Modeling. New York: Chapman and Hall. 80 p.
29. JefFers, J.N.R. 1988. Practitioner's Handbook on the Modeling of Dynamic Change in Ecosystems. New York: J. Wiley. 181 p.
30. Kenkel, N. C. and L. Orlóci. 1986. Applying metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling to ecological studies: some new results. Ecology 67:919-928.
31. Leeson, J. Y., J. W. Sheard, and A. G. Thomas. 1999. Multivariate classification of farming systems for use in integrated pest management studies. Can. J. Plant Sci. 79:647-654.
32. Leeson, J. Y., J. W. Sheard, and A. G. Thomas. 2000. Weed communities associated with arable Saskatchewan farm management systems. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:177-185.
33. Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 853 p.
34. Légère, A. and N. Samson. 1999. Relative influence of crop rotation, tillage and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping systems. Weed Sci. 47:112-122.
35. McCloskey, M., L. G. Firbank, A. R. Watkinson, and D. J. Webb. 1996 The dynamics of experimental arable weed communities under different management practices. J. Veg. Sci. 7:799-808.
36. McCune, B. 1997. Influence of noisy environmental data on canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 78:2617-2623.
37. Morrison, D. F. 1990. Multivariate Statistical Methods. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 495 p.
38. O'Donovan, J. T., D. W. McAndrew, and A. G. Thomas. 1997. Tillage and nitrogen influence weed population dynamics in barley (Hordeun vulgare). Weed Technol. 11:502-509.
39. Oksanen, J. and P. R. Minchin. 1997. Instability of ordination results under changes in input order: explanations and remedies. J. Veg. Sci. 8:447-454.
40. Ominski, P. D., M. H. Entz, and N. C. Kenkel. 1999. Weed supression by Medicago sativa in subsequent cereal crops: a comparative survey Weed Sci. 47:282-290.
41. Orlóci, L. 1966. Goemetric models in ecology. I. The theory and application of some ordination methods. J. Ecol. 54:193-215.
42. Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate Analysis in Vegetation Research. The Hague: Junk. 451 p.
43. Palmer, M. W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215-2230.
44. Podani, J. 1994. Multivariate Data Analysis in Ecology and Systematics. The Hague: SPB. 316 p.
45. Post, B. J. 1988. Multivariate analysis in weed science. Weed Res. 28:425-430.
46. Rao, C. R. 1964. The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhya Ser. A 26:329-358.
47. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69:69-77.
48. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1995. Ordination. Pages 91-173 in R.H.G. Jongman, C.J.F. ter Braak, and O.F.R. van Tongeren, eds. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. ter Braak, C.J.F. and I. C. Prentice. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18:271-317.
50. Thomas, A. G. and B. L. Frick. 1993. Influence of tillage systems on weed abundance in southwestern Ontario. Weed Technol. 7:699-705.
51. Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 688 p.
52. Wollenberg, A. L. van den. 1977. Redundancy analysis: an alternative to canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 42:207-219.
53. Zar, J. H. 1974. Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 620 p.