Mapping fetal brain development in utero using magnetic resonance imaging: The big bang of brain mapping

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue , 2011, Pages 345-368

  Studholme, Colin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cortical folding; Deformation morphometry; Image mosaic; Motion correction; Spatiotemporal atlas; Tissue segmentation

Indexed keywords

CORTICAL FOLDING; IMAGE MOSAIC; MOTION CORRECTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ATLAS; TISSUE SEGMENTATION;

COMPUTER VISION; DIAGNOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAPS; PEDIATRICS; RESONANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE;

BRAIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN GROWTH; BRAIN INFECTION; BRAIN MALFORMATION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN VENTRICLE DILATATION; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FETUS DEVELOPMENT; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; FETUS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 79957987860     PISSN: 15239829     EISSN: 15454274     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124654     Document Type: Article

References (174)

1. Toga AW, Thompson PM. 2003. Temporal dynamics of brain anatomy. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 5:119-45 (Pubitemid 40125309)
2. Mazziotta JC, Toga AW, Evans AC, Fox P, Lancaster J. 1995. A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: theory and rationale for its development. NeuroImage 2:89-101
3. MillerMI, Trouv́e A, Younes L. 2002. On the metrics and Euler-Lagrange equations of computational anatomy. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4:375-405 (Pubitemid 35217426)
4. Thompson PM, Mega MS, Woods RP, Zoumalan CI, Lindshield CJ, et al. 2001. Cortical change in Alzheimer's disease detected with a disease-specific population-based brain atlas. Cereb. Cortex 11(1):1-16 (Pubitemid 32064172)
5. Lerch JP, Pruessner JC, Zijdenbos A, Hampel H, Teipel SJ, Evans AC. 2005. Focal decline of cortical thickness in Alzheimer's disease identified by computational neuroanatomy. Cereb. Cortex 15:995-1001 (Pubitemid 40848068)
6. Cardenas VA, Boxer AL, Chao LL, Gorno-Tempini ML, Miller BL, et al. 2007. Deformation-based morphometry reveals brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia. Arch. Neurol. 64(6):873-77 (Pubitemid 46919843)
7. Narr KL, Bilder RM, Toga AW,Woods RP, Rex DE, et al. 2005. Mapping cortical thickness and gray matter concentration in first episode schizophrenia. Cereb. Cortex 15:708-19 (Pubitemid 40696111)
8. Cardenas VA, Studholme C, Gazdzinski S, Durazzo TC, Meyerhoff DJ. 2007. Deformation-based morphometry of brain changes in alcohol dependence and abstinence. NeuroImage 34(3):879-87 (Pubitemid 46084853)
9. Cardenas VA, Meyerhoff DJ, Studholme C, Kornak J, Rothlind J, et al. 2009. Evidence for ongoing brain injury in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients treated with antiretroviral therapy. J. Neurovirol. 15(4):324-33
10. Lenroot RK, Gogtay N, Greenstein DK, Wells EM, Wallace GL, et al. 2007. Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. NeuroImage 36:1065-73
11. Aljabar P, Bhatia KK, MurgasovaM, Hajnal JV, Boardman JP, et al. 2008. Assessment of brain growth in early childhood using deformation-based morphometry. NeuroImage 39:348-58 (Pubitemid 350102193)
12. Brun CC, Nicolson R, Lepore N, Chou YY, Vidal CN, et al. 2009. Mapping brain abnormalities in boys with autism. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30:3887-900
13. Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L,Hayashi KM,GreensteinD, et al. 2004. Dynamicmapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci.USA101(21):8174-79
14. Evans A. 2006. The NIH MRI study of normal brain development. NeuroImage 30:184-202 (Pubitemid 43243209)
15. Patterson JA, Gold WR, Sanz LE, McCullough DC. 1981. Antenatal evaluation of fetal hydrocephalus with computed tomography. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 140(3):344-45 (Pubitemid 11078561)
16. Pediaditis M, Leitgeb N, Cech R. 2008. RF-EMF exposure of fetus and mother during magnetic resonance imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 53:7187-95
17. Budinger TF. 1981. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in vivo studies: known thresholds for health effects. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 5(6):800-11 (Pubitemid 12229441)
18. Schaefer DJ. 1998. Safety aspects of radio-frequency power deposition in magnetic resonance. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 6:775-89 (Pubitemid 28545968)
19. Shellock FG. 2000. Radiofrequency-induced heating during MR procedures: a review. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12:30-36
20. Gandhi OP, Chen XB. 1999. Specific absorption rates and induced current densities for an anatomybased model of the human for exposure to time varying magnetic fields of MRI. Magn. Res. Med. 41(5):816-23 (Pubitemid 29205730)
21. Collins CM, LiuW,Wang J, Gruetter R, Vaughan JT, et al. 2004. Temperature and SAR calculations for a human head within volume and surface coils at 64 and 300 MHz. J. Magn. Res. Imaging 19:650-56 (Pubitemid 38619930)
22. Nguyen UD, Brown S, Chang IA, Krycia J, Mirotznik MS. 2004. Numerical evaluation of heating of the human head due to magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51(8):1301-9 (Pubitemid 38955151)
23. Wu D, Shamsi S, Chen J, Kainz W. 2006. Evaluations of specific absorption rate and temperature increase within pregnant female models in magnetic resonance imaging birdcage coils. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 54(12):4472-78
24. Dimbylow P. 2007. SAR in the mother and fetus for RF plane wave irradiation. Phys.Med. Biol. 52:3791-802 (Pubitemid 46908595)
25. Hand JW, Li Y, Thomas EL, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV. 2006. Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy. Magn. Reson.Med. 55:883-93
26. De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL. 2005. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 87:335-53 (Pubitemid 39533590)
27. Gowland PA, De Wilde J. 2008. Temperature increase in the fetus due to radio frequency exposure during magnetic resonance scanning. Phys. Med. Biol. 53:L15-18
28. Arulkumaran S, Talbert D, Hsu TS, Chua S, Anandakumar C, Ratnam SS. 1992. In utero sound levels when vibroacoustic stimulation is applied to the maternal abdomen: an assessment of the possibility of cochlea damage in the fetus. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 99:43-45
29. Schreiber WG, Teichmann EM, Schiffer I, Hast J, Akbari W, et al. 2001. Lack of mutagenic and co-mutagenic effects of magnetic fields during magnetic resonance imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14(6):779-88 (Pubitemid 33101538)
30. Leithner K, Pornbacher S, Assem-Hilger E, Krampl E, Ponocny-Seliger E, Prayer D. 2008. Psychological reactions in women undergoing fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet. Gynecol. 111(2):396-402 (Pubitemid 351653431)
31. Foster MA, Knight CH, Rimmington JE, Mallard JR. 1983. Fetal imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance: a study in goats. Radiology 149:193-95 (Pubitemid 13006832)
32. MaginRL, Lee JK, Klintsova A,CarnesKI, Dunn F. 2000. Biological effects of long-duration, high-field (4T) MRI on growth and development in the mouse. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12:140-49 (Pubitemid 30437272)
33. Levine D, Zuo C, Faro CB, Chen Q. 2001. Potential heating effect in the gravid uterus during MR HASTE imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13(6):856-61 (Pubitemid 32479942)
34. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR. 1994. A three-year follow up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 170:32-33 (Pubitemid 24084026)
35. Clements H, Duncan KR, Fielding K, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Baker PN. 2000. Infants exposed to MRI in utero have a normal pediatric assessment at 9 months of age. Br. J. Radiol. 73:190-94 (Pubitemid 30179228)
36. Kok RD, de Vries MM, Heerschap A, van den Berg PP. 2004. Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5 T in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow-up study. Magn. Reson. Imaging 22:851-54 (Pubitemid 38962322)
37. Thickman D,Mintz M, Mennuit M, KresselHY. 1984.MR imaging of cerebral abnormalities in utero. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 8(6):1058-61
38. McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Stark DD, Hricak H, Brant-Zawadzki MN, et al. 1985. Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: fetal anatomy. Radiology 154(2):427-32 (Pubitemid 15168386)
39. Smith FW, Adam AH, PhillipsWD. 1983. NMR imaging in pregnancy. Lancet 1:61-62
40. Levine D, Barnes PD, Edelman RR. 1999. Obstetric MR imaging. Radiology 211:609-17 (Pubitemid 29249451)
41. Williamson R, Weiner C, Yuh W, Abu-Yousef M. 1989. Magnetic resonance imaging of anomalous fetuses. Obstet. Gynecol. 73(6):952-56 (Pubitemid 19143829)
42. Weinreb JC, Lowe TW, Santos-Ramos R, Cunningham FG, Parkey R. 1985. Magnetic resonance imaging in obstetric diagnosis. Radiology 154:157-61 (Pubitemid 15196304)
43. Antuaco TL, Shah HR, Mattison DR, Quirk JG Jr. 1992. MR imaging in high-risk obstetric patients: a valuable complement to US. RadioGraphics 12:91-109
44. Powell MC, Worthington BS, Buckley JM, Symonds EM. 1988. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in obstetrics: II. Fetal anatomy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 95:38-46
45. Daffos F, Forestier F, Aleese JM, Aufrant C, Mandelbrot L, et al. 1988. Fetal curarization for prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. Prenatal Diagn. 8:311-14
46. Revel MP, Pons JC, Lelaidier C, Fournet P, Vial M, et al. 1993. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus: a study of 20 cases performed without curarization. Prenatal Diagn. 13:775-99 (Pubitemid 23297730)
47. Haase A, Frahm J, MatthaeiD,HanickeW,MerboldKD. 1986. FLASH imaging: RapidNMRimaging using low flip-angle pulses. J. Magn. Reson. 67:258-66
48. Listerud J, Einstein S, Outwater E, Kressel HY. 1992. First principles of fast spin echo. Magn. Reson. Q. 8:199-244
49. Hennig J, Friedburg H. 1988. Clinical applications and methodological developments of the RARE technique. Magn. Reson. Imaging 6:391-95
50. Mansfield P. 1977. Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes. J. Phys. C 10:L55-58
51. Mansfield P, Stehling MK, Ordidge RJ, Coxon R, Chapman B, et al. 1990. Echo planar imaging of the human fetus in utero at 0.5 T. Br. J. Radiol. 63:833-41 (Pubitemid 20369902)
52. Johnson IR, Stehling MK, Blamire AM, Coxon RJ, Howseman AM, et al. 1990. Study of internal structure of the human fetus in utero by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 163:601-7 (Pubitemid 20287643)
53. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R. 1999. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. New York:Wiley-Liss
54. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. 2004. Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Burlington, MA: Elsevier
55. Levine D. 2001. Three-dimensional fetal MR imaging: Will it fulfill its promise? Radiology 219:313-15 (Pubitemid 32336341)
56. Glover GH, Pauly JM. 1992. Projection reconstruction techniques for reduction of motion effects in MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 28:275-89 (Pubitemid 23027667)
57. Ahn CB, Kim JH, Cho ZH. 1986. High-speed spiral-scan echo planar NMR imaging: I. Med. Imaging 5(1):2-7 (Pubitemid 16595902)
58. Meyer CH, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. 1992. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 28:202-13 (Pubitemid 23027662)
59. Dold C, ZaitsevM, Speck O, Firle EA, Hennig J, Sakas G. 2005. Prospective headmotion compensation for MRI by updating the gradients and radio frequency during data acquisition. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 8(Pt. 1):482-89 (Pubitemid 43828286)
60. Zaitsev M, Dold C, Sakas G, Hennig J, Speck O. 2006. Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system. NeuroImage 31(3):1038-50
61. Tremblay M, Tam F, Graham SJ. 2005. Retrospective coregistration of functional magnetic resonance imaging data using external monitoring. Magn. Reson. Med. 53(1):141-49 (Pubitemid 40110487)
62. Peshkovsky A, KnuthKH, Helpern JA. 2003. Motion correction inMRI using an apparatus for dynamic angular position tracking (ADAPT). Magn. Reson. Med. 49(1):138-43 (Pubitemid 36042343)
63. Ehman R, Felmlee J. 1989. Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. Radiology 173(1):255-63 (Pubitemid 19242442)
64. Wang Y, Rossman PJ, Grimm RC, Riederer SJ, Ehman RL. 1996. Navigator-echo-based real-time respiratory gating and triggering for reduction of respiration effects in three-dimensional coronaryMR angiography. Radiology 198:55-60 (Pubitemid 26008240)
65. Norris DG, DrieselW. 2001. Onlinemotion correction for diffusion-weighted imaging using navigator echoes: application to RARE imaging without sensitivity loss. Magn. Reson. Med. 45:729-33 (Pubitemid 32402013)
66. Fu ZW,Wang Y,Grimm RC, Rossman PJ, Felmlee JP, et al. 1995. Orbital navigator echoes formotion measurements in magnetic resonance imaging.Magn. Reson. Med. 34:746-53
67. Wong ST, Roos MS. 1994. A strategy for sampling on a sphere applied to 3Dselective RF pulse design. Magn. Reson. Med. 32:778-84 (Pubitemid 24371180)
68. Welch EB, Manduca A, Grimm RC,Ward HA, Jack CR. 2002. Spherical navigator echoes for full 3D rigid body motion measurement in MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 47:32-41 (Pubitemid 34019690)
69. van der Kouwe AJW, Benner T,Dale AM. 2006. Real-time rigid body motion correction and shimming using cloverleaf navigators.Magn. Reson. Med. 56(5):1019-32
70. Brown TT, Kuperman JM, ErhartM,White NS, Roddey JC, et al. 2010. Prospectivemotion correction of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging data in children. NeuroImage 53:139-45
71. BonelH, Frei K, Raio L, Meyer-Wittkopf M, Remonda L,Wiest R. 2008. Prospective navigator-echobased real-time triggering of fetal head movement for the reduction of artifacts. Eur. Radiol. 18:822-29
72. Atkinson D, Hill DL, Stoyle PN, Summers PE, Keevil SF. 1997. Automatic correction of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images using an entropy focus criterion. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(6):903-10 (Pubitemid 127770449)
73. Horton KM, Tempany CMC. 1995. MRI in pregnancy. In MR and Imaging of the Female Pelvis, ed. CMC Tempany, pp. 235-60. St. Louis: Mosby
74. Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Abe Y, Takahashi M, Iwamasa J, et al. 1997. MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. Am. J. Roentgenol. 168(2):513-19 (Pubitemid 27052000)
75. Busse RF, Riederer SJ, Fletcher JG, Bharucha AE, Brandt KR. 2000. Interactive fast spin-echo imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 44(3):339-48
76. Glenn OA, Barkovich AJ. 2006. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis: Part 1. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 27:1604-11
77. Poutamo J, Vanninen R, Partanen K, Ryyn̈anen M, Kirkinen P. 1999. Magnetic resonance imaging supplements ultrasonographic imaging of the posterior fossa, pharynx and neck in malformed fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 13:327-34 (Pubitemid 29312641)
78. Cerraf BRB, Shipp TD, Bromley B, Levine D. 2007. What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal sonographic diagnosis of ventriculomegaly? J. Ultrasound Med. 26:1513-22
79. Kazan-Tannus JF, Dialani V, Kataoka ML, ChiangG, Feldman HA, et al. 2007.MRvolumetry of brain and CSF in fetuses referred for ventriculomegaly. Am. J. Radiol. 189:145-51 (Pubitemid 46983203)
80. d'Ercole C, Girard N, Cravello L, Boubli L, Potier A, et al. 1998. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum agenesis by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Prenatal Diagn. 18:247-53 (Pubitemid 28121143)
81. Rolo L, Araujo E, Nardozza L, de Oliveira P-C, Ajzen S, Moron A. 2011. Development of fetal brain sulci and gyri: assessment through two-and three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 283(2):149-58
82. Barkovich AJ, Girard N. 2003. Fetal brain infections. Child's Nerv. Syst. 19(7-8):501-7 (Pubitemid 37161595)
83. Girard N, Gire C, Sigaudy S, Porcu G, d'Ercole C, et al. 2003. MR imaging of acquired fetal brain disorders. Child's Nerv. Syst. 19(7-8):490-500 (Pubitemid 37161594)
84. Ozduman K, PoberBR, Barnes P, Copel JA, Ogle EA, et al. 2004. Fetal stroke. Pediatr. Neurol. 30(3):151-62 (Pubitemid 38366440)
85. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland PA, Hykin J, Adams V, et al. 1995. Measurement of fetal liver, brain and placental volumes with echoplanar magnetic resonance imaging. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 102:35-39
86. Gong QY, Roberts N, Garden AS, Whitehouse GH. 1998. Fetal and fetal brain volume estimation in the third trimester of human pregnancy using gradient echo MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 16(3):235-40 (Pubitemid 28264520)
87. Limperopoulos C, Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Newburger JW, Brown DW, et al. 2010. Brain volume and metabolism in fetuses with congenital heart disease: evaluation with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Circulation 121:26-33
88. Grossman R, Hoffman C, Mardor Y, Biegon A. 2006. Quantitative MRI measurements of human fetal brain development in utero. NeuroImage 33(2):463-70 (Pubitemid 44485563)
89. Hartley R, Zisserman A. 2000. Multiple View Geometry. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
90. Shum H, Szeliski R. 1998. Construction and refinement of panoramic mosaics with global and local alignment. Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV'98), Bombay, Jan. 4-7, pp. 953-58. New Delhi: Narosa
91. Capel D, Zisserman A. 1998. Automatic mosaicing with super-resolution zoom. Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR'98), Santa Barbara, Calif., June 23-25, pp. 885-91. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
92. Wachinger C, Glocker B, Zeltner J, Paragios N, Komodakis N, et al. 2008. Deformable mosaicing for whole-body MRI. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 11(Pt. 2):113-21
93. VercauterenT, PerchantA,Malandain G, PennecX,AyacheN. 2006. Robustmosaicingwith correction of motion distortions and tissue deformations for in vivo fibered microscopy. Med. Image Anal. 10:673-92 (Pubitemid 44283801)
94. Davis J. 1998. Mosaics of scenes with moving objects. Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR'98), Santa Barbara, Calif., June 23-25, pp. 354-60. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
95. Fei B, Duerk JL, Boll DT, Lewin JS, Wilson DL. 2003. Slice-to-volume registration and its potential application to interventional MRI-guided radio-frequency thermal ablation of prostate cancer. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22(4):515-25
96. Kim TS, SinghM, Sungkarat W, Zarow C, Chui H. 2000. Automatic registration of postmortem brain slices to MRI reference volume. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 47:1607-13
97. Zhengping J, Mowforth PH. 1991. Mapping between MR brain images and a voxel model. Inform. Health Soc. Care 16:183-93
98. Kim B, Boes JL, Bland PH, ChenevertTL, MeyerCR. 1999. Motion correction in fMRI via registration of individual slices into an anatomical volume. Magn. Reson. Med. 41:964-72 (Pubitemid 29211140)
99. Rousseau F, Glenn O, Iordanova B, Rodriguez-Carranza C, Vigneron D, et al. 2005. Reconstructing high-resolution in vivo fetal MR brain images. Proc. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. (MICCAI ), 8th, Palm Springs, Calif., Oct. 26-29, pp. 548-55. Berlin: Springer Verlag
100. Rousseau F, Glenn OA, Iordanova B, Rodriguez-Carranza CE, VigneronDB, et al. 2006. Registrationbased approach for reconstruction of high-resolution in utero MR brain images. Acad. Radiol. 13(9):1072-81
101. Lee S,Wolberg G, Shin SY. 1997. Scattered data interpolation with multilevel B-splines. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 3:228-44 (Pubitemid 127771593)
102. Franke R. 1982. Scattered data interpolation: tests of some methods. Math. Comput. 38(157):181-200
103. Amidror I. 2002. Scattered data interpolation methods for electronic imaging systems: a survey. J. Electron. Imaging 11:157-76 (Pubitemid 34536982)
104. Jiang S, Xue H, Glover A, Rutherford M, Rueckert D, Hajnal JV. 2007. MRI of moving subjects using multislice snapshot images with volume reconstruction (SVR): application to fetal, neonatal, and adult brain studies. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26:967-80 (Pubitemid 47147244)
105. Gholipour A, Estroff JA, Warfield SK. 2010. Robust super-resolution volume reconstruction from slice acquisitions: application to fetal brain MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(10):1739-58
106. Kim K, Hansen MF, Habas PA, Rousseau F, Glenn OA, et al. 2008. Intersection-based registration of slice stacks to form 3Dimages of the human fetal brain. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging (ISBI'08), Paris, May 14-17, pp. 1167-70. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
107. KimK,Habas PA,Rousseau F, Glenn OA, Barkovich AJ, Studholme C. 2010. Intersection basedmotion correction of multislice MRI for 3-D in utero fetal brain image formation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(1):146-58
108. Rousseau F, Studholme C, Koob M, Dietemann J-L. 2010. On super-resolution for fetal brain MRI. In Proc. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. (MICCAI ), 13th, Beijing, Sept. 20-24, pp. 355-62. Berlin: Springer
109. Rousseau F, Kim K, Studholme C. 2010. A groupwise super-resolution approach: application to brain MRI. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging (ISBI'10), Rotterdam, Apr. 14-17, pp. 860-63. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
110. Sled JG, Pike B. 1998. Standing-wave and RF penetration artifacts caused by elliptic geometry: an electrodynamic analysis of MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17(4):653-62 (Pubitemid 128747720)
111. Corbett-Detig JM, Habas PA, Scott JA, Kim K, Rajagopalan V, et al. 2011. 3D global and regional patterns of human fetal subplate growth determined in utero. Brain Struct. Funct. 215(3-4):255-63
112. Arnold JB, Liow JS, Schaper KA, Stern JJ, Sled JG, et al. 2001. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of six algorithms for correcting intensity nonuniformity effects. NeuroImage 13:931-43 (Pubitemid 32848337)
113. Kim K, Habas P, Rajagopalan V, Scott J, Corbett-Detig J, et al. 2010. Non-iterative relative bias correction for 3D reconstruction of in utero fetal brain MR imaging. Proc. 32nd Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Buenos Aires, Aug. 31-Sept. 4, pp. 879-82. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
114. Pham DL, Xu C, Prince JL. 2000. Current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2:315-37
115. Brummer ME. 1992. Optimized intensity thresholds for volumetric analysis of magnetic resonance imaging data. Proc. SPIE 1808:299-310
116. Kundu A. 1990. Local segmentation of biomedical images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 14:173-83 (Pubitemid 20185001)
117. Wells WM, Grimson EL, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA. 1996. Adaptive segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15:429-42 (Pubitemid 126780333)
118. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. 2000. Voxel-based morphometry: the methods. NeuroImage 11:805-21
119. Van Leemput K, Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P. 1999. Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18:897-908 (Pubitemid 32211105)
120. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. 2009. Computing average shaped tissue probability templates. NeuroImage 45(2):333-41
121. YanMXH,Karp JS. 1995. An adaptive Bayesian approach to three-dimensionalMRbrain segmentation. In Information Processing in Medical Imaging, ed. Y Bizais, C Barillot, RDi Paola, pp. 201-13. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer Academic
122. Kapur T, Grimson WEL, Wells WM, Kikinis R. 1996. Segmentation of brain tissue from magnetic resonance images. Med. Image Anal. 1:109-27 (Pubitemid 126421959)
123. Bystron I, Blakemore C, Rakic P. 2008. Development of the human cerebral cortex: Boulder committee revisited. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9:110-22
124. Habas PA, KimK, Rousseau F, Glenn OA, Barkovich AJ, Studholme C. 2010. Atlas-based segmentation of developing tissues in the human brain with quantitative validation in young fetuses. Hum. BrainMapp. 31(9):1348-58
125. Murgasova M, Dyet L, Edwards AD, Rutherford M, Hajnal JV, Rueckert D. 2007. Segmentation of brain MRI in young children. Acad. Radiol. 14(11):1350-66
126. Yoon U, FonovVS, Perusse D, Evans AC. 2009. The effect of template choice on morphometric analysis of pediatric brain data. NeuroImage 45(3):769-77
127. Altaye M, Holland SK, Wilke M, Gaser C. 2008. Infant brain probability templates for MRI segmentation and normalization. NeuroImage 43(4):721-30
128. Weisenfeld NI, Warfield SK. 2009. Automatic segmentation of newborn brain MRI. NeuroImage 47(2):564-72
129. Prastawa M, Gilmore JH, LinW, Gerig G. 2005. Automatic segmentation ofMR images of the developing newborn brain. Med. Image Anal. 9:457-66 (Pubitemid 41179342)
130. Warfield S, Kaus M, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R. 2000. Adaptive, template moderated, spatially varying statistical classification. Med. Image Anal. 4(1):43-55
131. Alexander GR, Tompkins ME, Petersen DJ, Hulsey TC, Mor J. 1995. Discordance between LMPbased and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy. Public Health Rep. 110(4):395-402
132. Habas PA, Kim K, Corbett-Detig JM, Rousseau F, Glenn OA, et al. 2010. A spatiotemporal atlas ofMR intensity, tissue probability and shape of the fetal brain with application to segmentation. NeuroImage 53(2):460-70
133. Habas PA, Kim K, Chandramohan D, Rousseau F, Glenn OA, Studholme C. 2009. Statistical model of laminar structure for atlas-based segmentation of the fetal brain from in utero MR images. Proc. SPIE 7259:725917
134. Grossman R, Hoffman C, Mardor Y, Biegon A. 2006. Quantitative MRI measurements of human fetal brain development in utero. NeuroImage 33:463-70 (Pubitemid 44485563)
135. Hu HH, Guo WY, Chen HY, Wang PS, Hung CI, et al. 2009. Morphological regionalization using fetal magnetic resonance images of normal developing brains. Eur. J. Neurosci. 29:1560-67
136. Widjaja E, Geibprasert S, Mahmoodabadi SZ, Blaser S, Brown NE, Shannon P. 2010. Alteration of human fetal subplate layer and intermediate zone during normal development on MR and diffusion tensor imaging. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 31:1091-99
137. Gholipour A, Estroff JA, Barnewolt CE, Connolly SA, Warfield SK. 2011. Fetal brain volumetry through MRI volumetric reconstruction and segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 6(3):329-39
138. Scott JA, Habas PA, Kim K, Rajagopalan V, Hamzelou KS, et al. 2011. Growth trajectories of the human fetal brain tissues estimated from 3D reconstructed in uteroMRI. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. In press, doi:10.1016/j. ijdevneu.2011.04.001
139. Davatzikos C, Vaillant M, Resnick SM, Prince JL, Letovsky S, Bryan RN. 1996. A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 20(1):88-97 (Pubitemid 26044035)
140. Rajagopalan V, Scott JA, Habas PA, Kim K, Corbett-Detig JM, et al. 2011. Local tissue growth patterns underlying normal fetal human brain gyrification quantified in utero. J. Neurosci. 31(8):2878-87
141. GarelC,ChantrelE,Brisse H, ElmalehM, Luton D, et al. 2001. Fetal cerebral cortex: normal gestational landmarks identified using prenatal MR imaging. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 22:184-89 (Pubitemid 32105374)
142. Batchelor PG, Castellano Smith AD, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ, Cox TCS, Dean AF. 2002. Measures of folding applied to the development of the human fetal brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21(8):953-65 (Pubitemid 35476599)
143. do CarmoMP. 1976. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
144. Koenderink JJ, vanDoorn AJ. 1992. Surface shape and curvature scales. Image Vis. Comput. 10(8):557-64
145. Rodriguez-Carranza CE, Mukherjee P, Vigneron D, Barkovic AJ, Studholme C. 2008. A framework for in vivo quantification of regional brain folding in premature neonates. NeuroImage 41(2):462-78
146. Habas PA, Scott JA, Roosta A, Rajagopalan V, Kim K, et al. 2011. Early folding patterns and asymmetries of the normal human brain detected from in utero MRI. Cereb. Cortex. In press, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr053
147. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. 1986. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 161:401-7 (Pubitemid 17173295)
148. Le Bihan D, Mangin J-F, Poupon C, Clark CA, Pappata S, et al. 2001. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13:534-46 (Pubitemid 32231507)
149. Le Bihan D. 2003. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4:469-80 (Pubitemid 37280168)
150. Le BihanD. 1995. Molecular diffusion, tissuemicrodynamics andmicrostructure. NMR Biomed. 8:375-86
151. Prayer D, Prayer L. 2003. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral white matter development. Eur. J. Radiol. 45:235-43 (Pubitemid 36204025)
152. Righini A, Bianchini E, Parazzini C,Gementi P, Ramenghi L, et al. 2003. Apparent diffusion coefficient determination in normal fetal brain: a prenatal MR imaging study. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 24:799-804 (Pubitemid 36617404)
153. Bui T, Daire JL, Chalard F, Zaccaria I, Alberti C, et al. 2006. Microstructural development of human brain assessed in utero by diffusion tensor imaging. Pediatr. Radiol. 36:1133-40
154. Baldoli C, Righini A, Parazzini C, Scotti G, Triulzi F. 2002. Demonstration of acute ischemic lesions in the fetal brain by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Ann. Neurol. 52:243-46 (Pubitemid 34810610)
155. Agid R, Lieberman S,Nadjari M, Gomori JM. 2006. PrenatalMRdiffusion- weighted imaging in a fetus with hemimegalencephaly. Pediatr. Radiol. 36:138-40
156. Huang H, Xue R, Zhang J, Ren T, Richards LJ, et al. 2009. Anatomical characterization of human fetal brain development with diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 29(13):4263-73
157. Kasprian G, Brugger PC, Weber M, Krssak M, Krampl E, et al. 2008. In utero tractography of fetal white matter development. NeuroImage 43:213-24
158. Jiang SZ, Xue H, Counsell S, Allsop MAJ, Rutherford M, et al. 2009. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the brain in moving subjects: application to in utero fetal and ex utero studies. Magn. Reson. Med. 62:645-55
159. Kim K, Habas PA, Rousseau F, Glenn OA, Barkovich AJ, Studholme C. 2010. Reconstruction of a geometrically correct diffusion tensor image of a moving human fetal brain. Proc. SPIE 7623:76231I
160. Oubel E, Koob M, Studholme C, Dietemann J-L, Rousseau F. 2010. Reconstruction of scattered data in fetal diffusion MRI. In Proc.Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. (MICCAI ), 13th, Beijing, Sept. 20-24, pp. 574-81. Berlin: Springer
161. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Nayak AS, Glynn P. 1990. Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn. Reson. Med. 14:68-78 (Pubitemid 20243866)
162. Raichle ME. 2010. Two views of brain function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14(4):180-90
163. GaoW, Zhu H, Giovanello KS, Smith K, ShenD, et al. 2009. Evidence on the emergence of the brain's default network from 2-week-old to 2-year-old healthy pediatric subjects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(16):6790-95
164. Fransson P, Aden U, Blennow M, Lagercrantz H. The functional architecture of the infant brain as revealed by resting-state fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 21(1):145-54
165. Jolles DD, van Buchem MA, Crone EA, Rombouts SARB. A comprehensive study of whole-brain functional connectivity in children and young adults. Cereb. Cortex 21(2):385-91
166. Hykin J, Moore R, Duncan K, Clare S, Baker P, et al. 1999. Fetal brain activity demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 354:645-46 (Pubitemid 29391431)
167. Fulford J, Vadeyar SH, Dodampahala SH, Moore RJ, Young P, et al. 2003. Fetal brain activity in response to a visual stimulus. Hum. Brain Mapp. 20:239-45 (Pubitemid 37486895)
168. Born P, Leth H, Miranda MJ, Rostrop E, Stensgaard A, et al. 1998. Visual activation in infants and young children studied by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr. Res. 44:578-83 (Pubitemid 28447346)
169. Griffin LD. 1994. The intrinsic geometry of the cerebral cortex. J. Theor. Biol. 166:261-73 (Pubitemid 24095568)
170. Van Essen DC. 1997. A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature 385:313-18 (Pubitemid 27053095)
171. Hilgetag CC, Barbas H. 2006. Role of mechanical factors in the morphology of the primate cerebral cortex. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2(3):e22
172. Flake AW. 2003. Surgery in the human fetus: the future. J. Physiol. 547:45-51 (Pubitemid 36285160)
173. Nelson BJ, Kaliakatsos IK, Abbot JJ. 2010. Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 12:55-85
174. Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, Adzick NS. 1999. The current status and future potential of fetal intervention: image is everything. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 23:51-57 (Pubitemid 29159809)