A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 88-97

  Davatzikos, Christos ^a   Vaillant, Marc ^a   Resnick, Susan M ^c   Prince, Jerry L ^b   Letovsky, Stanley ^a   Bryan, R Nick ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain, morphology; Corpus callosum; Image analysis; Image registration; Magnetic resonance imagery

Indexed keywords

ELASTIC DEFORMATION; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METADATA;

BRAIN MORPHOLOGIES; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DEFORMATION FUNCTION; IMAGE-ANALYSIS; IMAGES REGISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGERY; MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; PROPERTY; QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION; TALAIRACH ATLAS;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BRAIN SCINTISCANNING; CORPUS CALLOSUM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

EID: 0030045341     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199601000-00017     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. de Lacoste-Utamsing C, Holloway RL. Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Science 1982;216:1431-2.
2. de Lacoste MC, Holloway RL, Woodward DJ, Sex differences in the fetal corpus callosum. Hum Neurobiol 1986;5:93-6.
3. Holloway RL, Anderson PJ, Defendini R, Harper C. Sexual dimorphism of the human corpus callosum from three independent samples: relative size of the corpus callosum. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993;92:481-98.
4. Allen LS, Richey MF, Chai YM, Gorski RA. Sex differences in the corpus callosum of the living human being. J Neurosci 1991;11:933-42.
5. Byne W, Bleier R, Houston L. Variations in human corpus callosum do not predict gender: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. Behav Neurosci 1988;102:222-7.
6. Habib M, Gayraud D, Oliva A, Regis J, Salamon G, Khalil R. Effects of handedness and sex on the morphology of the corpus callosum: a study with brain magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Cogn 1991;16:41-61.
7. Oppenheim JS, Lee BC, Nass R, Gazzaniga M. No sex-related difference in human corpus callosum based on magnetic resonance images. Ann Neurol 1987;21:604-6.
8. Demeter S, Ringo JL, Doty RW. Morphometric analysis of the human corpus callosum and anterior commissure. Hum Neurobiol 1988;6:219-26.
9. Weber G, Weis S. Morphometric analysis of the human corpus callosum fails to reveal sex-related differences. J Hirnforsch 1986;27:237-40.
10. Witelson SF. The brain connection: the corpus callosum is larger in left-handers. Science 1985;229:665-8.
11. Steinmetz H, Jancke L, Kleinschmidt A, Schlaug G, Volkmann J, Huang Y. Sex but no hand difference in the isthmus of the corpus callosum. Neurology 1992;42:749-52.
12. Wu JC, Buchsbaum MS, Johnson JC, et al. Magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography imaging of the corpus callosum: size, shape and metabolic rate in unipolar depression. J. Affect Disord 1993;28:15-25.
13. Bell AD, Variend S. Failure to demonstrate sexual dimorphism of the corpus callosum. J Anat 1985;143:143-7.
14. Witelson SF. Hand and sex differences in the isthmus and genu of the human corpus callosum. Brain 1989;112:799-835.
15. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Thieme, 1988.
16. Davatzikos C, Prince JL, Paik C, Miller J, Bryan RN. A vector field approach for brain anatomy analysis. [Abstract]. Proc Am Soc of Neuroradiology, 1994:201-2.
17. Bryan RN, Davatzikos C, Vaillant M, et al. Creation of population-based anatomic atlases with a brain image database [Abstract]. First International Conf on Functional Brain Mapping, 1995:72.
18. Shock NW, Greulich RC, Andres R, et al. Normal human aging: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. U.S. Public Health Service publication no. NIH 84-2450. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984.
19. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97-111.
20. Jain AK. Fundamentals of digital image processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1989.
21. Davatzikos CA, Prince JL. An active contour model for mapping the cortex. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1995;14:65-80.
22. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1988;1:321-31.
23. Millman R, Parker G. Elements of differential geometry. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1977.
24. Davatzikos C, Prince JL, Bryan RN. Image registration based on boundary mapping. IEEE Trans Med Imag (in press).
25. Davatzikos C, Prince JL. Brain image registration based on curve mapping. Proc IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis, 1994:245-54.
26. Gurtin ME. An introduction to continuum mechanics. Orlando: Academic Press, 1981.
27. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987.
28. Evans AC, Dai W, Collins L, Neeling P, Marett S. Warping of a computerized 3-D atlas to match brain image volumes for quantitative neuroanatomical and functional analysis. SPIE Proc Image Proc 1991;1445:236-46.
29. Evans AC, Collins DL, Mills SR, Brown ED, Kelly RL, Peters TM. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Proc IEEE Nucl Sci Symposium and Med Imaging Conf, vol. 3. 1993:1813-7.