The involvement of posterior parietal cortex in feature and conjunction visuomotor search

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1964-1972

  Lane, Alison R ^a   Smith, Daniel T ^a   Schenk, Thomas ^a   Ellison, Amanda ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957945234     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21576     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Andersen, R. A., & Buneo, C. A. (2002). Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 189-220.
2. Arguin, M., Cavanagh, P., & Joanette, Y. (1994). Visual feature integration with an attention deficit. Brain and Cognition, 24, 44-56.
3. Ashbridge, E., Walsh, V., & Cowey, A. (1997). Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1121-1131.
4. Astafiev, S. V., Shulman, G. L., Stanley, C. M., Snyder, A. Z., Van Essen, D. C., & Corbetta, M. (2003). Functional organization of human intraparietal and frontal cortex for attending, looking and pointing. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 4689-4699.
5. Clower, D. M., Hoffman, J. M., Votaw, J. R., Faber, T. L., Woods, R. P., & Alexander, G. E. (1996). Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching. Nature, 383, 618-621.
6. Corbetta, M. (1998). Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 95, 831-838.
7. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
8. Coull, J. T., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Differential activation of right superior parietal cortex and intraparietal sulcus by spatial and nonspatial attention. Neuroimage, 8, 176-187.
9. Culham, J. C., Cavina-Pratesi, C., & Singhal, A. (2006). The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: What have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia, 44, 2668-2684.
10. Desmurget, M., Epstein, C. M., Turner, R. S., Prablanc, C., Alexander, G. E., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 563-567.
11. Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 423-431.
12. Donner, T. H., Kettermann, A., Diesch, E., Ostendorf, F., Villringer, A., & Brandt, S. A. (2002). Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks. Neuroimage, 15, 16-25.
13. Downar, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J., & Davis, K. D. (2002). A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 615-620.
14. Driver, J., & Vuilleumier, P. (2001). Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition, 79, 39-88.
15. Ellison, A., Lane, A. R., & Schenk, T. (2007). The interaction of brain regions during visual search processing as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2579-2584.
16. Ellison, A., Rushworth, M., & Walsh, V. (2003). The parietal cortex in visual search: A visuomotor hypothesis. Clinical Neurophysiology, Supplements, 56, 321-330.
17. Ellison, A., Schindler, I., Pattison, L. L., & Milner, A. D. (2004). An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS. Brain, 127, 2307-2315.
18. Fischer, M. H., & Adam, J. J. (2001). Distractor effects on pointing: The role of spatial layout. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 507-513.
19. Friedman-Hill, S. R., Robertson, L. C., & Treisman, A. (1995). Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science, 269, 853-855.
20. Fuggetta, G., Pavone, E., Walsh, V., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2006). Cortico-cortical interactions in spatial attention: A combined ERP/TMS study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 3277-3280.
21. Gitelman, D. R., Nobre, A. C., Parrish, T. B., LaBar, K. S., Kim, Y.-H., Meyer, J. R., et al. (1999). A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: Further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. Brain, 122, 1093-1106.
22. Heilman, K. M., & Van Den Abell, T.(1980). Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology, 30, 327-330.
23. Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., Valenstein, E., & Damasio, A. R. (1983). Localization of lesions in neglect. In A. Kertesz (Ed.), Localization in neuropsychology. New York: Academic Press.
24. Hodsoll, J., Mevorach, C., & Humphreys, G. (2009). Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 106-114.
25. Husain, M., & Nachev, P. (2007). Space and the parietal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 30-36.
26. Husain, M., & Rorden, C. (2003). Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 26-36.
27. Johnson, H., & Haggard, P. (2005). Motor awareness without perceptual awareness. Neuropsychologia, 43, 227-237.
28. Karnath, H.-O., & Perenin, M.-T. (2005). Cortical control of visually guided reaching: Evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1561-1569.
29. Levine, D. N., Kaufman, K. J., & Mohr, J. P. (1978). Inaccurate reaching associated with a superior parietal lobe tumor. Neurology, 28, 556-561.
30. Malhotra, P., Coulthard, E. J., & Husain, M. (2009). Role of right posterior parietal cortex in maintain attention to spatial locations over time. Brain, 132, 645-660.
31. Marois, R., Leung, H. C., & Gore, J. C. (2000). A stimulus-driven approach to object identity and location processing in the human brain. Neuron, 25, 717-728.
32. Mattingley, J. B., Husain, M., Rorden, C., Kennard, C., & Driver, J. (1998). Motor role of human inferior parietal lobe revealed in unilateral neglect patients. Nature, 392, 179-182.
33. Meegan, D., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Visual search and target-directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1347-1362.
34. Muggleton, N., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2008). The role of the angular gyrus in visual conjunction search investigated using signal detection analysis and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2198-2202.
35. Nobre, A., Coull, J., Walsh, V., & Frith, C. (2003). Brain activations during visual search: Contributions of search efficiency versus feature binding. Neuroimage, 18, 91-103.
36. Pelisson, D., Prablanc, C., Goodale, M. A., & Jeannerod, M. (1986). Visual control of reaching movement without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Experimental Brain Research, 62, 303-311.
37. Perenin, M.-T., & Vighetto, A. (1983). Optic ataxia: A specific disorder in visuomotor coordination. In A. Hein & M. Jeannerod (Eds.), Spatially oriented behavior (pp. 305-326). New York: Springer.
38. Perenin, M.-T., & Vighetto, A. (1988). Visuomotor mechanisms: I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain, 111, 643-674.
39. Pourtois, G., Vandermeeren, Y., Olivier, E., & de Gelder, B. (2001). Event-related TMS over the right posterior parietal cortex induces ipsilateral visuo-spatial interference. NeuroReport, 12, 2369-2374.
40. Rice, N. J., Tunik, E., & Grafton, S. (2006). The anterior intraparietal sulcus mediates grasp execution, independent of requirement to update: New insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8176-8182.
41. Rossetti, Y., Revol, P., McIntosh, R., Pisella, L., Rode, G., Danckert, J., et al. (2005). Visually guided reaching: Bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control. Neuropsychologia, 43, 162-177.
42. Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., Pascual-Leone, A., &The Safety of TMS Consensus Group. (2009). Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 2008-2039.
43. Rushworth, M. F. S., & Taylor, P. C. J. (2006). TMS in the parietal cortex: Updating representations for attention and action. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2700-2716.
44. Schindler, I., Ellison, A., & Milner, A. (2008). Contralateral visual search deficits following TMS. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 501-508.
45. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2006). Parietal cortex mediates voluntary control of spatial and non-spatial auditory attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 435-439.
46. Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (1997). Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 386, 167-170.
47. Sturm, W., de Simone, A., Krause, B. J., Specht, K., Hesselmann, V., Radermacher, I., et al. (1999). Functional anatomy of intrinsic alertness: Evidence for a fronto-parietal-thalamic-brainstem network in the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 37, 797-805.
48. Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centred attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905.
49. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
50. Tunik, E., Frey, S. H., & Grafton, S. T. (2005). Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 505-511.
51. Vallar, G. (1993). The anatomical basis of spatial hemineglect in humans. In I. H. Robertson & J. C. Marhsall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Wojciulik, E., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Implicit but not explicit feature binding in a Balint's patient. Visual Cognition, 5, 157-181.