Cortico-cortical interactions in spatial attention: A Combined ERP/TMS Study

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 3277-3280

  Fuggetta, Giorgio ^a,c   Pavone, Enea F ^c   Walsh, Vincent ^a   Kiss, Monika ^b   Eimer, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN CORTEX; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 33646201707     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01273.2005     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ashbridge E, Walsh V, and Cowey A. Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 35: 1121-1131, 1997.
2. Eimer M. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 99: 225-234, 1996.
3. Ellison A, Schindler I, Pattison LL, and Milner AD. An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS. Brain 127: 2307-2315, 2004.
4. Fierro B, Brighina F, Piazza A, Oliveri M, and Bisiach E. Timing of right parietal and frontal cortex activity in visuo-spatial perception: a TMS study in normal individuals. Neuroreport 12: 2605-2607, 2001.
5. Hopf JM, Luck SJ, Girelli M, Hagner T, Mangun GR, Scheich H, and Heinze HJ. Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. Cereb Cortex 10: 1233-1241, 2000.
6. Luck SJ and Hillyard SA. Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 1000-1014, 1994.
7. Muri RM, Buhler R, Heinemann D, Mosimann UP, Felblinger J, Schlaepfer TE, and Hess CW. Hemispheric asymmetry in visuospatial attention assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 143: 426-430, 2002.
8. Nobre AC, Coull JT, Walsh V, and Frith CD. Brain activations during visual search: contributions of search efficiency versus feature binding. Neuroimage 18: 91-103, 2003.
9. Okamoto M, Dan H, Sakamoto K, Takeo K, Shimizu K, Kohno S, Oda I, Isobe S, Suzuki T, Kohyama K, and Dan I. Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10-20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. Neuroimage 21: 99-111, 2004.
10. Rushworth MFS, Behrens TEJ, and Johansen-Berg H. Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex online publication, 28 November 2005.
11. Thut G, Ives JR, Kampmann F, Pastor MA, and Pascual-Leone A. A new device and protocol for combining TMS and online recordings of EEG and evoked potentials. J Neurosci Methods 141: 207-217, 2005.
12. Treisman A and Sato S. Conjunction search revisited. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16: 459-478, 1990.
13. Walsh V, Ellison A, Ashbridge E, and Cowey A. The role of the parietal cortex in visual attention- hemispheric asymmetries and the effects of learning: a magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 37: 245-251, 1999.
14. Woodman GF and Luck SJ. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 400: 867-869, 1999.