How the camel lost its hump: The impact of object typicality on event-related potential signals in object decision

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1338-1353

  Hauk, Olak ^a   Patterson, K ^a   Woollams, A ^a   Cooper Pye, E ^a   Pulvermuller F ^a   Rogers, T T ^a,b  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 34547644882     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1338     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alexander, M. P., Hiltbrunner, B., & Fischer, R. S. (1989). Distributed anatomy of transcortical sensory aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 46, 885-892.
2. Barrett, S. E., & Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain and Cognition, 14, 201-212.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. Bullier, J. (2001). Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Research, Brain Research Reviews, 36, 96-107.
5. Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: The evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 354-361.
6. Dale, A. M., & Sereno, M. I. (1993). Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 162-176.
7. Eulitz, C., Hauk, O., & Cohen, R. (2000). Electroencephalographic activity over temporal brain areas during phonological encoding in picture naming. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 2088-2097.
8. Gerlach, C. (2001). Structural similarity causes different category-effects depending on task characteristics. Neuropsychologia, 39, 895-900.
9. Gerlach, C., Law, I., Gade, A., & Paulson, O. B. (1999). Perceptual differentiation and category effects in normal object recognition: A PET study. Brain, 122, 2159-2170.
10. Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 55, 431-433.
11. Grill-Spector, K. (2003). The neural basis of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 159-166.
12. Grill-Spector, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science, 16, 152-160.
13. Halgren, E., Raij, T., Marinkovic, K., Jousmaki, V., & Hari, R. (2000). Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 69-81.
14. Hämäläinen, M. S., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1994). Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: Minimum norm estimates. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 32, 35-42.
15. Hart, J., Jr., & Gordon, B. (1990). Delineation of single-word semantic comprehension deficits in aphasia, with anatomical correlation. Annals of Neurology, 27, 226-231.
16. Hauk, O. (2004). Keep it simple: A case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. Neuroimage, 21, 1612-1621.
17. Hauk, O., Patterson, K., Woollams, A., Watling, L., Pulvermüller, F., & Rogers, T. T. (2006). [Q:] When would you prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP correlates of orthographic typicality and lexicality in written word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 818-832.
18. Hauk, O., Rockstroh, B., & Eulitz, C. (2001). Grapheme monitoring in picture naming: An electrophysiological study of language production. Brain Topography, 14, 3-13.
19. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying visual and semantic processing: Implications from "optic aphasia." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 457-478.
20. Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (1996). Nonfluent progressive aphasia and semantic dementia: A comparative neuropsychological study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 511-524.
21. Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K., Oxbury, S., & Funnell, E. (1992). Semantic dementia. Progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain, 115, 1783-1806.
22. Holcomb, P. J., & McPherson, W. B. (1994). Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task. Brain and Cognition, 24, 259-276.
23. Hovius, M., Kellenbach, M. L., Graham, K. S., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2003). What does the object decision task measure? Reflections on the basis of evidence from semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 17, 100-107.
24. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 453-476; discussion 476-509.
25. Humphreys, G. W., Lamote, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1995). An interactive activation approach to object processing: Effects of structural similarity, name frequency, and task in normality and pathology. Memory, 3, 535-586.
26. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1987). To see but not to see: Case study of visual agnosia. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis group.
27. Johnson, J. S., & Olshausen, B. A. (2005). The earliest EEG signatures of object recognition in a cued-target task are postsensory. Journal of Vision, 5, 299-312.
28. Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243-275.
29. Kellenbach, M. L., Hovius, M., & Patterson, K. (2005). A pet study of visual and semantic knowledge about objects. Cortex, 41, 121-132.
30. Kertesz, A., Sheppard, A., & MacKenzie, R. (1982). Localization in transcortical sensory aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 39, 475-478.
31. Kiefer, M. (2001). Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory & Cognition, 29, 100-116.
32. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463-470.
33. Levelt, W. J. (1995). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34. Levelt, W. J., Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., Helenius, P., & Salmelin, R. (1998). An MEG study of picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 553-567.
35. Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Luckhurst, L. (2002a). Effects of plane rotation, task, and complexity on recognition of familiar and chimeric objects. Memory & Cognition, 30, 499-510.
36. Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Luckhurst, L. (2002b). Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things. Memory & Cognition, 30, 489-498.
37. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 200, 269-294.
38. Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194-201.
39. Michel, C. M., Seeck, M., & Murray, M. M. (2004). The speed of visual cognition. Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement, 57, 617-627.
40. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
41. Patterson, K., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Jefferies, E., Woollams, A., Jones, R., Hodges, J. R., et al. (2006). "Presemantic" cognition in semantic dementia: Six deficits in search of an explanation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 169-183.
42. Price, C. J. (2000). The anatomy of language: Contributions from functional neuroimaging. Journal of Anatomy, 197, 335-359.
43. Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 517-524.
44. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576-582.
45. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual object processing in optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 131-185.
46. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). BORB: Birmingham Object Recognition Battery. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., et al. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205-235.
48. Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J., & Patterson, K. (2003). Object recognition under semantic impairment: The effects of conceptual regularities on perceptual decisions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 625-662.
49. Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Natural selection: The impact of semantic impairment on lexical and object decision. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 331-352.
50. Rossion, B., Joyce, C. A., Cottrell, G. W., & Tarr, M. J. (2003). Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. Neuroimage, 20, 1609-1624.
51. Salmelin, R., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V., & Sams, M. (1994). Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming. Nature, 368, 463-465.
52. Schendan, H. E., Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology, 35, 240-251.
53. Schmitt, B. M., Munte, T. F., & Kutas, M. (2000). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. Psychophysiology, 37, 473-484.
54. Sitnikova, T., West, W. C., Kuperberg, G. R., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The neural organization of semantic memory: Electrophysiological activity suggests feature-based segregation. Biological Psychology, 71, 326-340.
55. Snowden, J. S., Neary, D., Mann, D. M., Goulding, P. J., & Testa, H. J. (1992). Progressive language disorder due to lobar atrophy. Annals of Neurology, 31, 174-183.
56. VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 454-461.