Computed tomography for preoperative planning in minimal-invasive total hip arthroplasty: Radiation exposure and cost analysis

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 406-413

  Huppertz, Alexander ^a   Radmer, Sebastian ^b   Asbach, Patrick ^a   Juran, Ralf ^a   Schwenke, Carsten ^c   Diederichs, Gerd ^a   Hamm, Bernd ^a   Sparmann, Martin ^b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

^c Scossis Statistical Consulting   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D post processing; Computed tomography; Process cost analysis; Radiation exposure; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENDER; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; KNEE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PELVIS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGIST; SURGEON; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PREVALENCE; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOMETRY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79957905242     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.11.024     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kiefer H. Differences and Opportunities of THA in the USA, Asia and Europe. In: Chang J-D, Billau K, editors. Bioceramics and Alternative Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty. 12th BIOLOX® Symposium Proceedings. 2007. p. 3-8.
2. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F, Bensafi H, Puget J. Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results. Int Orthop 2007;31(5):597-603.
3. Malik A, Dorr LD. The science of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;463:74-84. (Pubitemid 47585255)
4. Woolson ST. In the absence of evidence-why bother? A literature review of minimally invasive total hip replacement surgery. Instr Course Lect 2006;55:189-93.
5. Radmer S, Sparmann M. Minimal-invasive hip joint replacement with an anterior approach using a CT-based 3D planning system. Orthopaedie-Report 2008:106-108.
6. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E. Three-Dimensional Hip Anatomy in Osteoarthritis Analysis of the Femoral Offset. J Arthroplasty 2009;24: 990-7.
7. Stamm G, Nagel HD. CT-expo-a novel program for dose evaluation in CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002;174(12):1570-6. (Pubitemid 36055040)
8. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E, Catone Y. Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91(3):333-40.
9. Dandachli W, Kannan V, Richards R, Shah Z, Hall-Craggs M, Witt J. Analysis of cover of the femoral head in normal and dysplastic hips: new CT-based technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90(11):1428-34.
10. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup - accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 2006;58(2):294-300.
11. Merle d'Aubigne R, Postel M. Functional results of arthroplasty with acrylic prothesis. J Bone Jt Surg 1954;36-A:451-755.
12. Wall BF, Hart D. Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 1997;70(833):437-9. (Pubitemid 27229261)
13. Jurik AG, Jensen LC, Hansen J. Total effective radiation dose from spiral CT and conventional radiography of the pelvis with regard to fracture classification. Acta Radiol 1996;37(5):651-4. (Pubitemid 126710151)
14. Al-Malki MA, Abulfaraj WH, Bhuiyan SI, Kinsara AA. A study on radiographic repeat rate data of several hospitals in Jeddah. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2003;103(4):323-30. (Pubitemid 36656379)
15. The B, Verdonschot N, van Horn JR, van Ooijen PM, Diercks RL. Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: a randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(6):866-70.
16. Lattanzi R, Baruffaldi F, Zannoni C, Viceconti M. Specialised CT scan protocols for 3-D pre-operative planning of total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys 2004;26(3):237-45. (Pubitemid 38231028)
17. Della Valle AG, Padgett DE, Salvati EA. Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13(7):455-62.
18. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early Complications of Primary Total Hip Replacement Performed with a Two-Incision Minimally Invasive Technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(Suppl 1 Pt 2):221-33.
19. Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C, Reiser MF, Becker CR. Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(3):695-701. (Pubitemid 44651492)
20. Das M, Mahnken AH, Mühlenbruch G, Stargardt A, Weiss C, Sennst DA, et al. Individually adapted examination protocols for reduction of radiation exposure for 16-MDCT chest examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(5):1437-43. (Pubitemid 43821813)
21. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler Jr JM. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 2006;26(2):503-12. (Pubitemid 43515321)
22. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 60. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1991.
23. Felsenberg D, Kalender WA, Trinkwalter W, Wolf KJ. CT examinations using a reduced radiation dosage. FortschrRöntgenstr 1990;153(5):516-21.
24. Ballanti F, Lione R, Fiaschetti V, Fanucci E, Cozza P. Low-dose CT protocol for orthodontic diagnosis. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2008;9(2):65-70.
25. Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Baena FM, Barrett AR, et al. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(11):1513-8. (Pubitemid 44782136)
26. van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J. Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose-comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. Radiology 2007;242(1):208-16. (Pubitemid 44956026)
27. Coppenrath E, Draenert F, Lechel U, Veit R, Meindl T, Reiser M, et al. Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT. FortschrRöntgenstr 2008;180(5):396-401. (Pubitemid 351985348)
28. Hietschold V, Koch A, Laniado M, Abolmaali ND. Computed tomography: influence of varying tube current on patient dose and correctness of effective dose calculations. FortschrRöntgenstr 2008;180(5):430-9. (Pubitemid 351985352)
29. O'Daniel JC, Stevens DM, Cody DD. Reducing radiation exposure from survey CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185(2):509-15.