Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 333-340

  Sariali, E ^a,b   Mouttet, A ^b   Pasquier, G ^c   Durante, E ^a   Catone, Y ^a  

^a PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Polyclinic Saint Roch Site Medipole ^*  (France)

^c CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE ROUBAIX   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT PLANNING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 63049105681     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21390     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Carter LW, Stovall DO, Young TR. Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral prostheses. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:507-13.
2. Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller ME. The value of pre-operative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:382-90.
3. Gonzalez Della Valle A, Comba F, Taveras N, Salvati EA. The utility and precision of analogue and digital pre-operative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2007;32:289-94.
4. Knight JL, Atwater RD. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty: quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty 1992;7:403-9.
5. Linclau L, Dokter G, Peene P. Radiological aspects in pre-operative planning and post-operative assessment of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 1993;59:163-7.
6. Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, et al. Computed tomography based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 1998;3:320-4.
7. Flecher X, Argenson JN, Parratte S, Ryembault E, Aubaniac JM. Custom cementless stem for osteoarthritis following developmental hip dysplasia. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2006;92:332-42 (in French).
8. Tönnis D, Heinecke A, Nienhaus R, Thiele J. Predetermination of arthrosis, pain and limitation of movement in congenital hip dysplasia. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1979;117:808-15 (in German).
9. Billing L. Roentgen examination of the proximal femur end in children and adolescents: a standardized technique also suitable for determination of the collum anteversion and epiphyseal angles: a study of slipped epiphysis and coxa plana. Acta Radiol Suppl 1954;110:1-80.
10. Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69-A:1169-76.
11. Berber E, Foroutani A, Garland AM, et al. Use of CT Hounsfield density to identify ablated tumor after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors. Surg Endosc 2000;14:799-804.
12. Adam F, Hammer DS, Pape D, Kohn D. The internal calcar septum (femoral high spur) in computed tomography and conventional radiography. Skeletal Radiol 2001;30:77-83.
13. Decking J, Decking R, Schoellner C, Drees P, Eckardt A. The internal calcar septum and its contact with the virtual stem in THR: a computer tomographic evaluation. Acta Orthop Scand 2003;74:542-6.
14. Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
15. Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey T, Mahoney O. Reconstruction hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:414-20.
16. Bourne R, Rorabeck CH. Soft tissue balancing: the hip. J Arthroplasty 2002;4:17-22.
17. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquerier G, Durante E. Three dimensional hip anatomy in primary osteoarthritis: femoral off-set anatomy. J Arthroplasty 2008;E-pub.
18. Seel M, Hafez MA, Eckman K, et al. Three-dimensional planning and virtual radiographs in revision total hip arthroplasty for instability. Clin Orthop 2006;442:35-8.
19. Haaker R, Tiedken K, Ottersbach A, et al. Comparison of conventional versus computed-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:151-9.
20. Kalteis T, Handel M, Bäthis H, et al. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:163-7.
21. Parratte S, Argenson JN, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM. Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2007;93:238-46 (in French).
22. Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop 2005;438:182-90.
23. DiGioia AM, Hafez MA, Jaramaz B, Levthson TJ, Moody JE. Functional pelvic orientation measured from lateral standing and sitting radiographs. Clin Orthop 2006;453:272-6.
24. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishiii T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H. Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop 2003;411:140-5.
25. Chen E, Goertz W, Lill CA. Implant position calculation for acetabular cup placement. Comput Aided Surg 2006;11:309-16.
26. Parratte S, Pagano MW, Coleman-Wood K, Kaufman K, Berry D. Variation in post-operative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of contemporary hip navigation systems. Clin Orthop 2009;467:467-9.
27. Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD. Reconstruction of the hip: a mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1979;61-A:639-52.
28. Krishnan S, Carrington RWJ, Mohiyaddin S, Garlick N. Common misconceptions of normal hip joint relations on pelvic radiographs. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:409-12.
29. Husmann O, Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, de Roguin B, Argenson JN. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:444-50.
30. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, et al. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop 1988;235:148-65.
31. Jurik A, Jensen LC, Hansen J. Total effective radiation dose from spiral CT and conventional radiography of the pelvis with regard to fracture classification. Acta Radiol 1996;37:651-4.
32. Abelson P. Risk assessment of low level exposure. Science 1994;265:1507.
33. Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, et al. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement: the imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:1513-18.