Three-Dimensional Hip Anatomy in Osteoarthritis. Analysis of the Femoral Offset

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 990-997

  Sariali, Elhadi ^a,b   Mouttet, Alexandre ^c   Pasquier, Gilles ^d   Durante, Ernesto ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Polyclinic Saint Roch ^*  (France)

^d CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE ROUBAIX   (France)

Author keywords

3 dimensional; femoral offset; hip anatomy; modular neck; prosthesis design

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ACETABULUM; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MALALIGNMENT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 68649085703     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.031     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Asayama I., Chamnongkich S., Simpson K.J., et al. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 414
2. Bourne R.B., and Rorabeck C.H. Soft tissue balancing: the hip. J Arthroplasty 4 Suppl 1 (2002) 17
3. Murray D.W. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 (1993) 228
4. Billing L. Roentgen examination of the proximal femur end in children and adolescents. A standardized technique also suitable for determination of the collum anteversion and epiphyseal angles. A study of slipped epiphysis and coxa plana. Acta Radiol 110 (1954) Supplementum
5. Murphy S.B., Simon S.R., Kijewski P.K., et al. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69 (1987) 1169
6. Landis J.R., and Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159
7. Jolles B.M., Zangger P., and Leyvraz P.F. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. Multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 282
8. Noble P.C., Alexander J.W., Lindhal L.J., et al. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235 (1988) 148
9. Husmann O., Rubin P.J., Leyvraz P.F., et al. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 12 (1997) 444
10. Rubin P.J., Leyvraz P.E., Aubaniac J.M., et al. The morphology of the proximal femur: a three dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74 (1992) 28
11. Argenson J.N., Ryembault E., Flecher X., et al. Three-dimensional anatomy of the hip in osteoarthritis after developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 1192
12. De Thomasson E., Mazel C., Guingand O., et al. Value of preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop 88 (2002) 229
13. Ranawat G.S., Maynard M.J., and Desmukh R.G. Cemented primary total hip arthroplasty. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery: the hip (1998), Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia 217
14. Terry Canale S. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. 9th ed (1998), Mosby, St. Louis
15. In: Callaghan J.J., Rosenberg A.G., and Rubash H.E. (Eds). The adult hip (1998), Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia 1142
16. In: Morrey B.F., Chao E., Cooney W., et al. (Eds). Joint replacement arthroplasty (1991), Churchill Living-stone, New york 647
17. Eckman K., Hafez M.A., ED F., et al. Accuracy of pelvic flexion measurements from lateral radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451 (2006) 154
18. Spencer J.M., Day R.E., Sloan K.E., et al. Computer navigation of the acetabular component: a cadaver reliability study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 972
19. Krishnan S.P., Carrington R.W.J., Mohiyaddin S., et al. Common misconceptions of normal hip joint relations on pelvic radiographs. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 409
20. Jurik A.G., Jensen L.C., and Hansen J. Total effective radiation dose from spiral CT and conventional radiography of the pelvis with regard to fracture classification. Acta Radiol 37 (1996) 651
21. Schuetz A., Kolokytas O., Wisianowski C., et al. Multiple detector helical CT of the chest can reduce x-ray dose to 0,3 mGy. 85th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. November 28 to December 3 (1999), McCormick Place, Chicago