Study of the time effect on the strength of cell-cell adhesion force by a novel nano-picker

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Volumn 409, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 160-165

  Shen, Yajing ^a   Nakajima, Masahiro ^a   Kojima, Seiji ^a   Homma, Michio ^a   Fukuda, Toshio ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cell contact time; Environmental SEM; Nano picker; Single cell adhesion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; CELL CONTACT; CELL INTERACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FORCE; NANOFABRICATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRENGTH;

CELL ADHESION; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; NANOPARTICLES; ROBOTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79957903893     PISSN: 0006291X     EISSN: 10902104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gumbiner B. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 1996, 84:345.
2. Berrier A.L., Yamada K.M. Cell-matrix adhesion. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007, 213:565-573.
3. Wu C.C., Su H.W., Lee C.C., Tang M.J., Su F.C. Quantitative measurement of changes in adhesion force involving focal adhesion kinase during cell attachment, spread, and migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 329:256-265.
4. Fu G., Milburn C., Mwenifumbo S., Cao Y., Oparinde G., Adeoye M., Therialt C., Beye A., Soboyejo W. Shear assay measurements of cell adhesion on biomaterials surfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2009, 29:1293-1301.
5. Ueki Y., Sakamoto N., Sato M. Direct measurement of shear strain in adherent vascular endothelial cells exposed to fluid shear stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 394:94-99.
6. Reyes C.D., Garca A.J. A centrifugation cell adhesion assay for high-throughput screening of biomaterial surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2003, 67:328-333.
7. Chu Y.S., Thomas W.A., Eder O., Pincet F., Perez E., Thiery J.P., Dufour S. Force measurements in E-cadherin Cmediated cell doublets reveal rapid adhesion strengthened by actin cytoskeleton remodeling through Rac and Cdc42. J. cell biol. 2004, 167:1183.
8. Sagvolden G., Giaever I., Pettersen E., Feder J. Cell adhesion force microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96:471.
9. Franz C., Puech P.H. Atomic force microscopy: a versatile tool for studying cell morphology, adhesion and mechanics. Cel. Mol. Bioeng. 2008, 1:289-300.
10. Francis L.W., Lewis P.D., Wright C.J., Conlan R.S. Atomic force microscopy comes of age. Biol. Cell 2010, 102:133-143.
11. Lal R., John S.A. Biological applications of atomic force microscopy. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 1994, 266:C1.
12. Kim Y.J., Shin J.W., Park K.D., Lee J.W., Yui N., Park S.A., Jee K.S., Kim J.K. A study of compatibility between cells and biopolymeric surfaces through quantitative measurements of adhesive forces. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2003, 14:1311-1321.
13. Puech P.H., Poole K., Knebel D., Muller D.J. A new technical approach to quantify cell-cell adhesion forces by AFM. Ultramicroscopy 2006, 106:637-644.
14. Dufrne Y.F., Boonaert C.J.P., van der Mei H.C., Busscher H.J., Rouxhet P.G. Probing molecular interactions and mechanical properties of microbial cell surfaces by atomic force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 2001, 86:113-120.
15. Vadillo-Rodriguez V., Busscher H.J., Norde W., De Vries J., Dijkstra R.J.B., Stokroos I., van der Mei H.C. Comparison of atomic force microscopy interaction forces between bacteria and silicon nitride substrata for three commonly used immobilization methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70:5441.
16. Fukuda T., Nakajima M., Liu P., Ahmad M. Bringing the nanolaboratory inside electron microscopes. Nanotechnol. Mag., IEEE 2008, 2:18-31.
17. Han S.W., Nakamura C., Obataya I., Nakamura N., Miyake J. A molecular delivery system by using AFM and nanoneedle. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 20:2120-2125.
18. Madl J., Rhode S., Stangl H., Stockinger H., Hinterdorfer P., Schtz G.J., Kada G. A combined optical and atomic force microscope for live cell investigations. Ultramicroscopy 2006, 106:645-651.
19. Vesenka J., Mosher C., Schaus S., Ambrosio L., Henderson E. Combining optical and atomic force microscopy for life sciences research. BioTechniques 1995, 19:240-253.
20. Danilatos G. Introduction to the ESEM instrument. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1993, 25:354-361.
21. Muscariello L., Rosso F., Marino G., Giordano A., Barbarisi M., Cafiero G., Barbarisi A. A critical overview of ESEM applications in the biological field. J. Cell. Physiol. 2005, 205:328-334.
22. Kometani R., Hoshino T., Kanda K., Haruyama Y., Kaito T., Fujita J., Ishida M., Ochiai Y., Matsui S. Three-dimensional high-performance nano-tools fabricated using focused-ion-beam chemical-vapor-deposition. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2005, 232:362-366.
23. Kometani R., Funabiki R., Hoshino T., Kanda K., Haruyama Y., Kaito T., Fujita J., Ochiai Y., Matsui S. Cell wall cutting tool and nano-net fabrication by FIB-CVD for subcellular operations and analysis. Microelectron. Eng. 2006, 83:1642-1645.
24. Shen Y., Nakajima M., Ahmad M.R., Fukuda T., Kojima S., Homma M. Single cell penetration using nano-pipette by E-SEM nanorobotic manipulation system, Mechatronics, Automation. ICMA 2009, International Conference 2009, 1849-1854.
25. Inada T., Aiba H. Translation of aberrant mRNAs lacking a termination codon or with a shortened 3-UTR is repressed after initiation in yeast. EMBO J. 2005, 24:1584-1595.
26. Abbott J.J., Nagy Z., Beyeler F., Nelson B.J. Robotics in the small, Part I: Microbotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2007, 14:92-103.
27. Dembo M., Torney D., Saxman K., Hammer D. The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1988, 234:55-83.
28. Rinker K.D., Prabhakar V., Truskey G.A. Effect of contact time and force on monocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium. Biophys. J. 2001, 80:1722-1732.
29. Vogel V., Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:265-275.