Nonmass lesions in magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Additional T2-weighted images improve diagnostic accuracy

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 361-366

  Baltzer, Pascal A T ^a   Dietzel, Matthias ^a   Kaiser, Werner A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

BI RADS; breast cancer; Breast MRI; descriptors; MR mammography; neoplasm; sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAMMOGRAPHY;

BI-RADS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEMS; BREAST MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING; DESCRIPTORS; MR MAMMOGRAPHY; NEOPLASM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; T1-WEIGHTED; T2 WEIGHTED;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST CYST; BREAST DUCT; BREAST LESION; CONSENSUS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79957846912     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31821065c3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248-3258.
2. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370:485-492. (Pubitemid 47214635)
3. Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG, et al. MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;107:1-14. (Pubitemid 350179588)
4. Vag T, Baltzer PA, Renz DM, et al. Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography compared with conventional mammography. Clin Imaging. 2008;32:438-442.
5. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, et al. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:671-679. (Pubitemid 351669112)
6. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:889-895. (Pubitemid 32479947)
7. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas: 1st ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
8. Ikeda D. MRI lexicon: what should be improved? Eur Radiol. 2006;16: E49-E50.
9. Baltzer PA, Renz DM, Herrmann KH, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (haste) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol. 2009;19 (7):1612-1620.
10. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171-178. (Pubitemid 34694831)
11. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:330-337. (Pubitemid 44148274)
12. Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, et al. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:994-1000.
13. Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS, et al. DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? Med Phys. 2008;35:3102-3109. (Pubitemid 351904514)
14. Walker RA. The complexities of breast cancer desmoplasia. Breast Cancer Res. 2001;3:143-145. (Pubitemid 32390213)
15. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:964-970.
16. Choi N, Han BK, Choe YH, et al. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:834-841. (Pubitemid 41689551)
17. Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, et al. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:241-246.
18. Sotome K, Yamamoto Y, Hirano A, et al. The role of contrast enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of non-mass image-forming lesions on breast ultrasonography. Breast Cancer. 2007;14:371-380.
19. Renz DM, Baltzer PA, Bottcher J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory breast carcinoma and acute mastitis. A comparative study. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2370-2380.
20. Bydder GM, Young IR. MR imaging: clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985;9:659-675. (Pubitemid 15008672)
21. Warren RM, Thompson D, Pointon LJ, et al. Evaluation of a prospective scoring system designed for a multicenter breast MR imaging screening study. Radiology. 2006;239:677-685. (Pubitemid 43830602)
22. Baltzer PA, Freiberg C, Beger S, et al. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:1070-1076.
23. Facius M, Renz DM, Neubauer H, et al. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging. 2007;31:394-400. (Pubitemid 350051365)
24. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology. 1989;170:681-686. (Pubitemid 19062582)
25. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101-110. (Pubitemid 29161739)
26. Neubauer H, Li M, Kuehne-Heid R, et al. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol. 2003;76:3-12. (Pubitemid 36236293)
27. Bartella L, Thakur SB, Morris EA, et al. Enhancing nonmass lesions in the breast: evaluation with proton (1H) MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2007;245:80-87. (Pubitemid 47417790)