Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography compared with conventional mammography

Clinical Imaging

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 438-442

  Vag, Tibor ^a   Baltzer, Pascal A T ^a   Renz, Diane M ^a   Pfleiderer, Stefan O R ^a   Gajda, Mieczyslaw ^a   Camara, Oumar ^a   Kaiser, Werner A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Magnetic resonance mammography; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC MATERIALS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETISM; MEDICAL IMAGING; RESONANCE; SURGERY;

BREAST CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACHES; DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU; LESION SIZES; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; PATIENT AGES;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 55649085035     PISSN: 08997071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lagios M.D. Heterogeneity of duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS): relationship of grade and subtype analysis to local recurrence and risk of invasive transformation. Cancer Lett 90 (1995) 97-102
2. Ernster V.L., Ballard-Barbash R., Barlow W.E., Zheng Y., Weaver D.L., Cutter G., Yankaskas B.C., Sickles E.A., Dignan M.D., Rosenberg R.D., Carney P.A., Kerlikowske A., Taplin S.H., Urban N., and Geller B. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 94 (2002) 1546-1554
3. Menell J.H., Morris E.A., Dershaw D.D., Abramson A.F., Brogi E., and Libermann L. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 11 (2005) 382-390
4. Orel S.G., Mendonca M.E., and Reynolds C. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 202 (1997) 413-420
5. Kuhl C.K., Schrading S., Bieling H.B., Wardelmann E., Leutner C.C., Koenig R., Kuhn W., and Schild H.H. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370 (2007) 485-491
6. Sittek H., Kessler H., Heuck A.F., Bredl T., Perlet C., Künzer I., Lebeau A., Untch M., and Reiser M. Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0T MR mammography. Fortschr Röntgenstr 167 (1997) 247-251
7. Shiraishi A., Kurosaki Y., Maehara T., Suzuki M., and Kurosumi M. Extension of ductal carcinoma in situ: histoptahological association with MR imaging and mammography. Magn Reson Medic Science 4 (2003) 159-163
8. Bazzocchi M., Zuiani C., Panizza P., Del Frate C., Soldano F., Isola M., Sardanelli F., Guiseppetti G.M., Simonetti G., Lattanzio V., and Del Machino A. Contrast enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 1723-1732
9. Kaiser W.A., and Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 70 (1989) 681-686
10. Drew P.J., Chatterjee S., Turnbull L.B., Read J., Carleton P.J., and Fox J.N. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the preoperative detection of multifocal breast cancer. Ann Surg Onc 6 (1999) 599-603
11. Kuhl C.K. MRI of breast tumors. Eur Radiol 10 (2000) 46-58
12. Brem R.F., Fishman M., and Rapelyea J.A. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Acad Radiol 14 (2007) 945-950
13. Neubauer H., Mengxia L., Kuehne-Heid R., Schneider A., and Kaiser W.A. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol 76 (2003) 3-12
14. Weidner N., Semple J.P., Welch W.R., and Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 324 (1991) 1-8
15. Gilles R., Zafrani B., Guinebretiere J.M., Meunier M., Lucidame O., Tardivon A.A., Rochard F., Vanel D., Neuenschwander S., and Arriagada R. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 196 (1995) 415-419
16. Guidi A.J., Fischer L., Harris J.R., and Schnitt S.J. Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 86 (1994) 614-619
17. Hulka C.A., Smith B.L., Sgroi D.C., Tan L., Edmister, Semple J.P., Campbell T., Kopans D.B., Brady T.J., and Weisskoff R.M. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 197 (1995) 33-38
18. Facius M., Renz D.M., Neubauer H., Böttcher J., Gajda M., Camara O., and Kaiser W.A. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 31 6 (2007) 394-400
19. Brown L.F., Guidi A.J., Schnitt S.J., Van de Water L., Iruela-Arispe M.L., Yeo T.K., Tognazzi K., and Dvorak H.F. Vascular stroma formation in carcinoma in situ, invasive carcinoma and metastatic carcinoma of the breast. Clin Cancer Res 5 (1999) 1041-1056
20. Picolli C.W., Matteuci T., Outwater E.K., Siegelman E.S., and Mitchell D.G. Breast cancer diagnosis with MR imaging: effect of clinical and mammographic findings on recommendations for biopsy. Radiology 197 (1995) 372-376