Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 834-841

  Choi, Nami ^a   Han, Boo Kyung ^a   Yeon, Hyeon Choe ^a   Hye, Sung Kim ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast; Diagnosis; MRI

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING;

BREAST; BREAST LESION; BREAST MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING; INTENSITY PROJECTION IMAGES; MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION; MORPHO-LOGICS; PHASE DYNAMICS; THREE PHASE; THREE PHASIS; TWO WAYS;

KINETICS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 28044470961     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000181722.84844.9c     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Harms SE, Glaming DP, Hesley KL, et al. MT imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493-501.
2. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, et al. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1994;190:485-493.
3. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology. 1997;202:833-841.
4. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology. 1989;171:95-103.
5. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MT imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1989;170:681-686.
6. Wedegartner U, Bick U, Wortler K, et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1645-1650.
7. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171-178.
8. Orel SG. Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? Radiology. 1999;211:5-7.
9. Orel SC, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220:13-30.
10. Ikeda DM. Progress report from the American College of Radiology Breast MR Imaging Lexicon Committee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001;9:295-302.
11. Morris EA. Illustrated breast MR lexicon. Semin Roentgenol. 2001;36:238-249.
12. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:35-43.
13. Choi BG, Kim HH, Kim EN, et al. New subtraction algorithms for evaluation of lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:3018-3022.
14. Hylton NM. Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001;9:321-331.
15. Schnall MD. An overview of interpretation strategies for breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001;9:289-293.
16. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging. Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101-110.
17. Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:965-974.
18. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, Ness Aiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830-849.
19. Giagounidis EM, Markus R, Josef L, et al. CT-guided preoperative needle localization of MRI-detected breast lesions. Eur J Radiol. 2001;39:100-103.