Quantum-yield-optimized fluorophores for site-specific labeling and super-resolution imaging

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 133, Issue 21, 2011, Pages 8090-8093

  Grunwald, Christian ^a   Schulze, Katrin ^a   Giannone, Gregory ^b,c   Cognet, Laurent ^b   Lounis, Brahim ^b   Choquet, Daniel ^b,c   Tampé, Robert ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^c University of Bordeaux   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPA-RECEPTOR; EXCITATION MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE INTENSITY PROFILE; FLUORESCENCE LIFETIMES; FLUORESCENCE SIGNALS; FLUORESCENT DYES; IN-VIVO; MACROMOLECULAR COMPLEXES; PHOTOSTABLE; PROOF OF PRINCIPLES; PROTEIN LABELING; SINGLE-MOLECULE; SITE-SPECIFIC; STIMULATED EMISSION DEPLETION MICROSCOPY; SUPER RESOLUTION IMAGING; SUPER-RESOLUTION MICROSCOPY; SUPERIOR RESOLUTION; SYNAPTIC CLEFT;

BIOSYNTHESIS; FLUORESCENCE; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; OPTIMIZATION; QUANTUM THEORY; QUANTUM YIELD; STIMULATED EMISSION;

FLUOROPHORES;

AMPA RECEPTOR; FLUOROPHORE DERIVATIVE; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; POLYPROLINE II; PROLINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE; LIFESPAN; NERVE CELL; PROTEIN STABILITY; QUANTUM YIELD; RIGIDITY; STEADY STATE; STIMULATED EMISSION DEPLETION MICROSCOPY; SYNAPSE;

ANIMALS; FLUORESCENT DYES; HIPPOCAMPUS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; NEURONS; RATS; RECEPTORS, AMPA;

EID: 79957681263     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: 15205126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja200967z     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hell, S. W. Science 2007, 316, 1153
2. Fernandez-Suarez, M.; Ting, A. Y. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 9, 929
3. Chan, W. C. W.; Maxwell, D. J.; Gao, X. H.; Bailey, R. E.; Han, M. Y.; Nie, S. M. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 40
4. Chan, W. C. W.; Nie, S. M. Science 1998, 281, 2016
5. Heine, M.; Groc, L.; Frischknecht, R.; Beique, J. C.; Lounis, B.; Rumbaugh, G.; Huganir, R. L.; Cognet, L.; Choquet, D. Science 2008, 320, 201
6. Gao, X. H.; Yang, L. L.; Petros, J. A.; Marshal, F. F.; Simons, J. W.; Nie, S. M. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16, 63
7. Howarth, M.; Liu, W.; Puthenveetil, S.; Zheng, Y.; Marshall, L. F.; Schmidt, M. M.; Wittrup, K. D.; Bawendi, M. G.; Ting, A. Y. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 397
8. Liu, W.; Greytak, A. B.; Lee, J.; Wong, C. R.; Park, J.; Marshall, L. F.; Jiang, W.; Curtin, P. N.; Ting, A. Y.; Nocera, D. G.; Fukumura, D.; Jain, R. K.; Bawendi, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 472
9. Kirchner, C.; Liedl, T.; Kudera, S.; Pellegrino, T.; Javier, A. M.; Gaub, H. E.; Stolzle, S.; Fertig, N.; Parak, W. J. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 331
10. Derfus, A. M.; Chan, W. C. W.; Bhatia, S. N. Nano. Lett. 2004, 4, 11
11. Dorn, I. T.; Neumaier, K. R.; Tampé, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2753
12. Lata, S.; Reichel, A.; Brock, R.; Tampé, R.; Piehler, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10205
13. Tinazli, A.; Tang, J. L.; Valiokas, R.; Picuric, S.; Lata, S.; Piehler, J.; Liedberg, B.; Tampé, R. Chem. - Eur. J. 2005, 11, 5249
14. Lata, S.; Piehler, J. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2104
15. Lata, S.; Gavutis, M.; Piehler, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6
16. Lata, S.; Gavutis, M.; Tampé, R.; Piehler, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2365
17. Lata, S.; Piehler, J. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 1096
18. Artelsmair, H. Small 2008, 4, 847
19. Tinazli, A.; Piehler, J.; Beuttler, M.; Guckenberger, R.; Tampé, R. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 220
20. Giannone, G.; Hosy, E.; Levet, F.; Constals, A.; Schulze, K.; Sobolevsky, A. I.; Rosconi, M. P.; Gouaux, E.; Tampé, R.; Choquet, D.; Cognet, L. Biophys. J. 2010, 99, 1303
21. Cowan, P. M.; McGavin, S. Nature 1955, 176, 501
22. Williamson, M. P. Biochem. J. 1994, 297, 249
23. Schuler, B.; Lipman, E. A.; Steinbach, P. J.; Kumke, M.; Eaton, W. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 2754
24. Stryer, L.; Haugland, R. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1967, 58, 719
25. Moon, A. Y.; Poland, D. C.; Scheraga, H. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69, 2960
26. x-fluorophores varies within roughly 30%, which hardly affects the diffusion coefficient. Therefore, the different molecules can be considered to be the same size and travel at the same speed. Thus, the frequency of collisions is almost constant.
27. Doose, S.; Neuweiler, H.; Barsch, H.; Sauer, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 17400
28. Orange, C.; Specht, A.; Puliti, D.; Sakr, E.; Furuta, T.; Winsor, B.; Goeldner, M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1217
29. Fujiwara, T.; Ritchie, K.; Murakoshi, H.; Jacobson, K.; Kusumi, A. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 157, 1071