Predicting lamp spectrum effects at mesopic levels. Part 1: Spatial brightness

Lighting Research and Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 143-157

  Fotios, S A ^a   Cheal, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; LIGHTING;

COLOUR-RENDERING INDICES; MATCHING TECHNIQUES; MESOPIC PHOTOMETRY; RECOMMENDED SYSTEMS; SPATIAL BRIGHTNESS; SPECTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION; SPECTRUM EFFECTS; VISUAL PERFORMANCE;

LUMINANCE;

EID: 79957610228     PISSN: 14771535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477153510393932     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. British Standards Institution (BSI) BS EN 13201-2: 2003. Road Lighting - Part 2: Performance Requirements. London: BSI, 2003.
2. British Standards Institution (BSI) BS5489-1: 2003. Code of Practice for the Design of Road Lighting -Part 1: Lighting of Roads and Public Amenity Areas. London: BSI, 2003.
3. Guo X., Houser KW A review of colour rendering indices and their application to commercial light sources. Lighting Research and Technology 2004 ; 36 (3). 183-199.
4. van Trigt C. Color rendering, a reassessment. Color Research and Application 1999 ; 24 (3). 197-206. (Pubitemid 129543802)
5. Boyce PR Investigations of the subjective balance between illuminance and lamp colour properties. Lighting Research and Technology 1977 ; 9: 11-24.
6. Sandor N., Schanda J. Visual colour rendering based on colour difference evaluations. Lighting Research and Technology 2006 ; 38 (3). 225-236.
7. Szabo F., Bodrogi P., Schanda J. A colour harmony rendering index based on predictions of colour harmony impression. Lighting Research and Technology 2009 ; 41 (2). 165-179.
8. Loewen LJ, Steel GD, Suedfeld P. Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1993 ; 13: 323-333.
9. Boyce PR, Eklund NH, Hamilton BJ, Bruno LD Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Lighting Research and Technology 2000 ; 32: 79-91.
10. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Lighting for subsidiary streets: Investigation of lamps of different SPD. Part 2 - Brightness. Lighting Research and Technology 2007 ; 39 (3). 233-252. (Pubitemid 47527861)
11. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Predicting lamp spectrum effects at mesopic levels. Part 2: Preferred appearance and visual acuity. Lighting Research and Technology 2011 (In press).
12. Rea MS, Bullough JD, Akashi Y. Several views of metal halide and high pressure sodium lighting for outdoor applications. Lighting Research and Technology 2009 ; 41 (4). 297-320.
13. Rea MS Essay by invitation. Lighting Design and Application 1996 ; 26: 15-16.
14. Morante P. Mesopic Street Lighting Demonstration and Evaluation. Final Report for Groton Utilities, Groton, Connecticut. Troy NY: Lighting Research Center, 2008.
15. Akashi Y., Rea M., Morante P. Progress Report: Improving Acceptance and Use of Energy-efficient Lighting. Unified Photometry: An Energy-efficient Street Lighting Demonstration in Easthampton. Massachusetts. Troy, NY: Lighting Research Center, 2004.
16. Fotios SA, Cheal C. A comparison of simultaneous and sequential brightness judgements. Lighting Research and Technology 2010 ; 42 (2). 183-197.
17. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Brightness matching with visual fields of different types. Lighting Research and Technology doi:10.1177/ 1477153510369478.
18. Rea MS, Radetsky LC, Bullough JD Toward a model of outdoor lighting scene brightness. Lighting Research and Technology doi:10.1177/ 1477153510370821.
19. Boyce PR, Bruno LD An evaluation of high pressure sodium and metal halide light sources for parking lot lighting. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 1999 ; 28: 16-32.
20. Fotios SA, Houser KW, Cheal C. Counterbalancing needed to avoid bias in side-by-side brightness matching tasks. Leukos 2008 ; 4 (4). 207-223.
21. Fotios SA, Houser KW Research methods to avoid bias in categorical ratings of brightness. Leukos 2009 ; 5 (3). 167-181.
22. Poulton EC Bias in Quantifying Judgements. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989.
23. Bartleson CJ, Breneman EJ Differences among responses of observers in scaling brightness. Die Farbe 1973 ; 22: 200-212.
24. Akashi Y., Boyce PR A field study of illuminance reduction. Energy and Buildings 2006 ; 38 (6). 588-599.
25. Hu X., Houser KW, Tiller DK Higher colour temperature lamps may not appear brighter. Leukos 2006 ; 3 (1). 69-81. (Pubitemid 46489430)
26. Vrabel PL, Bernecker CA, Mistrick RG Visual performance and visual clarity under electric light sources: Part II - Visual Clarity. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 1988 ; 27 (1). 29-41.
27. Osterhaus WKE, Bailey IL Large area glare sources and their effect on discomfort and visual performance at computer workstations: Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas, Oct 4-9: 1992.
28. Pawlak U., Roll K-F. VDTs: Setting levels for reflected luminance. Siemens Review 1990 ; 4: 27-29.
29. Ramasoot T. Investigation of lighting and disturbing reflections on display screens: A new model for judging acceptability, PhD thesis. Sheffield: University of Sheffield, 2010.
30. Poulton EC Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading. British Journal of Psychology 1977 ; 68: 409-425.
31. Vienot F., Durand M. -L, Mahler E. Kruithof's rule revisited using LED illumination. Journal of Modern Optics, 2009 56 (13). 1433-1446.
32. Fotios SA, Gado T. A comparison of visual objectives used in side-by-side matching tests. Lighting Research and Technology 2005 ; 37 (2). 117-131.
33. Rea MS, Freyssinier-Nova JP Color rendering: A tale of two metrics. Color Research and Application 2008 ; 33 (3). 192-202. (Pubitemid 351618480)
34. Commission Internationale de l'Iclairage. Recommended System for Visual Performance Based Mesopic Photometry, CIE Publication 191, Vienna: CIE, 2010.
35. Berman SM, Jewett DL, Fein G., Saika G., Ashford F. Photopic luminance does not always predict perceived room brightness. Lighting Research and Technology 1990 ; 22 (1). 37-41.
36. Fotios SA, Levermore GJ Chromatic effect on apparent brightness in interior spaces, II: SWS lumens model. Lighting Research and Technology 1998 ; 30 (3). 103-106. (Pubitemid 128534757)
37. Smith V., Pokorny J. Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm. Vision Research 1975 ; 15: 161-171.
38. Cone fundamental database. Colour and Vision Research Laboratory, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College, London. Retrieved 7 July 2010, from http://www.cvrl.ucsd.edu/cones.htm.
39. Kaiser PK, Boynton RM Human Color Vision. 2 nd Edition, Washington DC: Optical Society of America, 1996.
40. Loe DL, Mansfield KP, Rowlands E. Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: Experimental study. Lighting Research and Technology 1994 ; 26 (3). 119-133.
41. Dunn-Rankin P., Knezek GA, Wallace S., Zhang S. Scaling Methods. 2 nd Edition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
42. Quellman EM, Boyce PR The light source color preferences of people of different skin tones. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 2002 ; 31 (1). 109-118.
43. Palmer DA Standard observer for large-field photometry at any level. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1968 ; 58: 1296-1299.
44. Kokoschka S., Bodmann HW A consistent system for the photometric evaluation of radiation over the whole range of adaptation: Proceedings of the 18th session of the CIE, London. CIE Publication 36, Vienna: CIE, 1975.
45. Sagawa K. Toward a CIE supplementary system of photometry: brightness at any level including mesopic vision. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2006 ; 26: 240-245. (Pubitemid 43742713)
46. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Correspondence. Correction: Lighting for subsidiary streets: Investigation of lamps of different SPD. Part 2 - Brightness. Lighting Research and Technology 2009 ; 41 (4). 381-383.