Counterbalancing needed to avoid bias in side-by-side brightness matching tasks

LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 207-223

  Fotios, S A ^a   Houser, K W ^b   Cheal, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRIGHTNESS MATCHING; DIMMING CONTROL; LIGHTING DESIGNS; MATCHING TECHNIQUES; MULTIPLE REFERENCES; RELATIVE POSITIONS; SPECTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 77649156013     PISSN: 15502724     EISSN: 15502716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1582/LEUKOS.2008.04.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alman DH. 1977 October. Errors of the standard photometric system when measuring the brightness of general illumination light sources. J Illum Eng Soc. 7(1): 55-62.
2. Alman DH, Breton ME, Barbour J. 1983. New results on the brightness matching of heterochromatic stimuli. J Illum Eng Soc. 12(4):268-274. (Pubitemid 13607035)
3. Aston SM, Bellchambers HE. 1969. Illumination, colour rendering and visual clarity. Light Res Technol. 1(4):259-261.
4. Bellchambers HE, Godby AC. 1972. Illumination, colour rendering and visual clarity. Light Res Technol. 4(2):104-106.
5. Booker RL. 1978. Luminance-brightness comparisons of LED alpha-numeric sources at suprathreshold levels. J Opt Soc Am. 68(7):949-952.
6. Boyce PR. 1977. Investigations of the subjective balance between illuminance and lamp colour properties. Light Res Technol. 9:11-24.
7. CIE. 1978. Light as a true visual quantity: principals of measurement. Paris: Commission Internationale De L'É clairage.
8. Field A. 2005. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
9. Fotios SA. 2001a. Lamp colour properties and apparent brightness: a review. Light Res Technol. 33(3):163-181.
10. Fotios SA. 2001b. An error in brightness matching associated with the application of dimming. Light Res Technol. 33(4):223-231.
11. Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2007a. Lighting in subsidiary streets: investigation of SPD effects. Part 2 - Brightness. Light Res Technol. 39(3):233-252. (Pubitemid 47527861)
12. Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2007b. Evidence For Response Contraction Bias In Side-By-Side Matching Tasks. Light Res Technol. 39(2):159-169. (Pubitemid 46958386)
13. Fotios S, Gado T. 2005. A comparison of visual objectives used in side-by-side matching tests. Light Res Technol. 37(2):117-131.
14. Fotios SA, Levermore GJ. 1997. The Perception Of Electric Light Sources Of Different Colour Properties. Light Res Technol. 29(3):161-171.
15. Fotios SA, Levermore GJ. 1995. Visual perception under tungsten lamps with enhanced blue spectrum. Light Res Technol. 27(4):173-179.
16. Gescheider GA. 1997. Psychophysics: The fundamentals. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Harrington RE. 1954. Effect of color temperature on apparent brightness. J Opt Soc Am. 44(2):113-116.
18. Hashimoto K, Nayatani Y. 1994. Visual clarity and feeling of contrast. Color Res App. 19(3): 171-185.
19. Houser KW, Tiller DK, Hu X. 2003. Prototype demonstration of vision-tuned fluorescent lamps. Final report for California Energy Commission.
20. Houser KW, Hu X. 2004. Visually matching daylight fluorescent lamplight with two primary sets. Color Res App. 29(6):428-437.
21. Hu X, Houser KW, Tiller DK. 2006. Higher color temperature lamps may not appear brighter. Leukos 3(1):69-81. (Pubitemid 46489430)
22. Hunt RWG. 1995. Measuring Colour. London: Ellis Horwood.
23. Jou J, Leka GE, Rogers DM, Matus YE. 2004. Contraction bias in memorial quantifying judgment: Does it come from a stable compressed memory representation or a dynamic adaptation process? Am J Psychol. 117(4):543-564. (Pubitemid 40004405)
24. Kinney JAS. 1955. Sensitivity of the eye to spectral radiation at scotopic and mesopic intensity levels. J Opt Soc Am. 45(7):507-514.
25. LaBoeuf RA, Shafir E. 2006. The long and the short of it: Physical anchoring effects. J Behav Decis Mak. 19:393-406. (Pubitemid 44598836)
26. Lemons TM, Robinson AV. 1976. Does visual clarity have meaning for IES illuminance recommendations for task lighting? Lighting Des App. 6(11):24-30.
27. Levermore GJ. 1994. Perception of lighting and brightness from HID light sources. Light Res Technol. 26(3):145-150.
28. Pereverzeva M, Teller DY. Centering biases in heterochromatic brightness matching. Vision Res. 200;45(25-26):3290-33005.
29. Poulton EC. 1989. Bias in quantifying judgements. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
30. Poulton EC. 1977. Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading. Brit J Psychol. 68:409-425.
31. Randhawa HS. 1997. Visual characteristics of light sources for residential road lighting. Visual Scales: Photometric & Colorimetric aspects. NPL - CIE-UK Conference, March 1997. pp. 65-68.
32. Ray S. 1989. The evaluation of a daylight tungsten lamp for task lighting. Under-graduate student research project, Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University
33. Teller DY, Pereverzeva M, Civan AL. 2003. Adult brightness vs. luminance as models of infant photometry: Variability, biasability and spectral characteristics for two age groups favour the luminance model. J of Vision. 3:333-346. (Pubitemid 39047378)
34. Thornton WA, Chen E. 1978. What is visual clarity? J Illum Eng Soc. 7(2):85-94. (Pubitemid 8567184)
35. Thornton WA, Chen E, Morton EW, Rachko D. 1980 October. Brightness Meter. J Illum Eng Soc. 10(1): 52-63.
36. Tiller DK, Veitch JA. 1995. Perceived room brightness: Pilot study on the effect of luminance distribution. Light Res Technol. 27(2):93-101.
37. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157):1124-2113
38. Worthey JA. 1985. An analytical visual clarity experiment. J Illum Eng Soc. 15(1):239-251.
39. Zheleznikova OE, Myasoedova EI. 1995. Comparison of luminosities of lighting installations with discharge light sources. Light & Eng. 3(2):38-39.