A comparison of simultaneous and sequential brightness judgements

Lighting Research and Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 183-197

  Fotios, Sa ^a   Cheal, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGHTING;

BRIGHTNESS MATCHING; DISCRIMINATION TESTS; MESOPIC; SPATIAL BRIGHTNESS; SPECTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION;

LUMINANCE;

EID: 77953603483     PISSN: 14771535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477153509355506     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Lighting in subsidiary streets: investigation of SPD effects. Part 2 - Brightness. Lighting Research and Technology 2007 ; 39: 233-252. (Pubitemid 47527861)
2. Berman SM, Jewett DL, Fein G., Saika G., Ashford F. Photopic luminance does not always predict perceived room brightness. Lighting Research and Technology 1990 ; 22: 37-41.
3. Vrabel PL, Bernecker CA, Mistrick RG Visual performance & visual clarity under electric light sources: Part II - visual clarity. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 1998 ; 27: 29-41.
4. Yeshurun Y., Carrasco M., Maloney LT Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model. Vision Research 2008 ; 48: 1837-1851.
5. Uchikawa K., Ikeda M. Accuracy of memory for brightness of colored lights measured with successive comparison method. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1986 ; 3: 34-39.
6. Bullough JD, Yuan Z., Rea MS Perceived brightness of incandescent and LED aviation signal lights. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 2007 ; 78: 893900.
7. Hsee CK, Loewenstein GF, Blount S., Bazerman MH Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1999 ; 125: 576-590.
8. Fotios SA, Levermore GJ The perception of electric light sources of different colour properties. Lighting Research and Technology 1997 ; 29: 161-171.
9. Boyce PR, Cuttle C. Effect of correlated colour temperature on the perception of interiors and colour discrimination. Lighting Research and Technology 1990 ; 22: 19-36.
10. Jäsignkel F., Wichmann FA Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for nave observers. Journal of Vision 2006 ; 6: 1307-1322.
11. Fotios SA An error in brightness matching associated with the application of dimming. Lighting Research and Technology 2001 ; 33: 223-231.
12. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Evidence for response contraction bias in side-by-side matching tasks. Lighting Research and Technology 2007 ; 39: 159-169.
13. Fotios SA, Houser KW, Cheal C. Counterbalancing needed to avoid bias in side-by-side brightness matching tasks. Leukos 2008 ; 4: 207-223.
14. Fotios SA, Cheal C. The effect of a stimulus frequency bias in side-by-side brightness ranking tests. Lighting Research and Technology 2008 ; 40: 43-54.
15. Teller DY, Pereverzeva M., Civan AL Adult brightness vs. luminance as models of infant photometry. Journal of Vision 2003 ; 3: 333-346.
16. Kinney JAS. Sensitivity of the eye to spectral radiation at scotopic and mesopic intensity levels. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1955 ; 45: 507-514.
17. Boyce PR Investigations of the subjective balance between illuminance and lamp colour properties. Lighting Research and Technology 1977 ; 9: 11-24.
18. LaBoeuf RA, Shafir E. The long and short of it: Physical anchoring effects. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making 2006 ; 19: 393-406.
19. Zheleznikova OE, Myasoedova EI Comparison of luminosities of lighting installations with discharge light sources. Light and Engineering 1995 ; 3: 38-39.
20. Foster DH, Amano K., Nascimento MC Colour constancy from temporal cues: better matches with less variability under fast illuminant changes. Vision Research 2001 ; 41: 285-293.
21. Hunt RWG. Measuring Colour, 2 nd Edition, London: Ellis Horwood, 1995.
22. Lennie P., Pokorny J., Smith VC Luminance. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1993 ; 10: 1283-1293.
23. Wagner G., Boynton RM Comparison of four methods of heterochromatic photometry. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1972 ; 62: 1508-1515.
24. Yaguchi H., Ikeda M. Contribution of opponent-colour channels to brightness. In: Mollon JD, Sharpe LT. (eds), Colour Vision: Physiology & Psychophysics. London: Academic Press, 1983: 353-360.
25. Fairchild MD, Reniff L. Time course of chromatic adaptation for color-appearance judgements. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1995 ; 12: 824-833.
26. Shevell SK The time course of chromatic adaptation. Color Research & Application 2001 ; 26 (Supplement): S170 - S173.
27. Braun KM, Fairchild MD, Alessi PJ Viewing techniques for cross-media image comparisons. Color Research & Application 1996 ; 21: 6-17.
28. Fotios SA The effect of chromatic adaptation upon the relationship between lamp spectrum and brightness at photopic levels. Lighting Research and Technology 2006 ; 38: 3-17.
29. Viénot F., Durand M. -L, Mahler E. The effect of LED lighting on performance, appearance and sensations: CIE Light and Lighting Conference, Budapest. Programme and abstracts, 2009: 19-20.
30. Koga Y., Takao M. Light response properties of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in non-image-forming vision: CIE Light & Lighting Conference, Budapest. Programme and abstracts, 2009: 145-146..
31. Berman SM, Jewett DL, Benson BR, Law TM Despite different wall colours, vertical scotopic illuminance predicts pupil size. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 1997 ; 26: 59-68.
32. Wyszecki G., Stiles WS Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.
33. Kasthurirangan S., Glasser A. Age related changes in the characteristics of the near pupil response. Vision Research 2006 ; 46: 1393-1403.
34. Feinberg R., Podolak E. Latency of the Pupillary Reflex to Light Stimulation and its Relationship to Aging. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Agency, Office of Aviation Medicine, 1965. Reprinted from Thomas CC. Behavior, Aging and the Nervous System, Welford AT, Birren JE editors, Springfield, Illinois.
35. Andreassi JL Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response, 4 th Edition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
36. Houser KW, Fotios SA, Royer MP A test of the S/P ratio as a correlate for brightness perception using rapid-sequential and side-by-side experimental protocols. Leukos 2009 ; 6: 119-137.
37. British Standards Institution (BSI). BS EN 13201-2:2003, Road Lighting - Part 2: Performance Requirements. London: BSI, 2003.
38. Fotios S., Gado T. A comparison of visual objectives used in side-by-side matching tests. Lighting Research and Technology 2005 ; 37: 117-131.
39. Dunn-Rankin P., Knezek GA, Wallace S., Zhang S. Scaling Methods, 2 nd Edition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
40. British Standards Institution (BSI). BS 5489 Road Lighting: Part 3, Code of Practice for Lighting for Subsidiary Roads and Associated Pedestrian Areas. London: BSI, 1992.
41. Menon A., Bhandarkar S. Predicting polymorphic transformation curves using a logistic equation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2004 ; 286: 125-129.