Technology clustering based on evolutionary patterns: The case of information and communications technologies

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 953-967

  Lee, Hyoung joo ^a   Lee, Sungjoo ^b   Yoon, Byungun ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b Ajou University   (South Korea)

^c Dongguk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Evolutionary patterns; Information and communications technology; Patent analysis; Technology clustering; Trend analysis

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING ANALYSIS; CLUSTERING TECHNOLOGIES; CONVENTIONAL APPROACH; EMERGING TRENDS; EVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS; GROWTH PATTERNS; ICT INDUSTRIES; INDIVIDUAL TECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY; MULTIPLE TECHNOLOGY; PATENT ANALYSIS; POTENTIAL VALUES; SIMILAR PATTERN; TECHNOLOGICAL CONVERGENCE; TECHNOLOGY CHANGE; TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY TRENDS; TREND ANALYSIS; UNDERLYING FACTORS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FACE RECOGNITION; GROWTH RATE; HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS; INDUSTRY; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; TECHNOLOGY;

INNOVATION;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FORECASTING METHOD; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; MARKOV CHAIN; TREND ANALYSIS;

EID: 79957517233     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Yoon B., Park Y. Development of new technology forecasting algorithm: hybrid approach for morphology analysis and conjoint analysis of patent information. IEEE T. Eng. Manage. 2007, 54(3):588-599.
2. Zhu D., Porter A.L. Automated extraction and visualization of information for technological intelligence and forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2002, 69:495-506.
3. Barker D., Smith J.H.D. Technology foresight using roadmaps. Long Range Plann. 1995, 28(2):495-506.
4. Lee S., Kim M., Park Y. ICT co-evolution and Korean ICT strategy - an analysis based on patent data. Telecommun. Policy 2009, 33:253-271.
5. OECD Technology Fusion: A Path to Innovation, The Case of Optoelectronics, Paris 1993, 7-11.
6. Harianto F., Pennings J. Technological convergence and scope of organizational innovation. Res. Policy 1994, 23:293-304.
7. Hacklin F., Marxt C., Fahrni F. Coevolutionary cycles of convergence: an extrapolation from the ICT industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2009, 76:723-736.
8. No H.J., Park Y. Trajectory patterns of technology fusion: trend analysis and taxonomical grouping in nanobiotechnology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2010, 77:63-75.
9. Kodama F. Technology Fusion and the New R&D, Harvard Bus. Rev. July-August 1992, 70-78.
10. Rafols I., Meyer M. How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics 2007, 70(3):633-650.
11. Daim T.U., Rueda G., Martin H., Gerdsri P. Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2006, 73:981-1012.
12. Basberg B.L. Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of literature. Res. Policy 1987, 16(131):141.
13. Ernst H. Patent information for strategic technology management. World Pat. Inf. 2003, 25:233-242.
14. Park J., Shin J.S.K., Sanders G.L. Impact of international information technology transfer on national productivity. Inform. Syst. Res. 2007, 18:86-102.
15. Lamirel J.C., Shehabi S.A., Hoffmann M., Francois C. Intelligent Patent Analysis Through the Use of a Neural Network: Experiment of Multi-view Point Analysis with the MultiSom Model. Proceedings of the ACL-2003 Workshop on Patent Corpus Processing 2002.
16. Tseng Y.H., Wang Y.M., Juang D.W., Lin C.J. Text Mining for Patent Map Analysis, IACIS Pacific 2005 Conference Proceedings 2005, 755-765.
17. Yoon B., Park Y. A text-mining-based patent network: analytic tool for high-technology trend. J. High Tech. Manage. Res. 2004, 15(1):37-50.
18. Fleming L., Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 2001, 30:1019-1039.
19. Lee H. Retrospective technology assessment: the impacts of computer communications on the structure of the public telephone network. Telecommun. Policy 1997, 21(9/10):30-51.
20. Rosenkopf L., Nekar A. Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Manage. J. 2001, 22:287-306.
21. Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of inventions. RAND J. Econ. 1990, 21:172-187.
22. Choi C., Kim S., Park Y. A patent-based cross impact analysis for quantitative estimation of technological impact: the case of information and communication technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2007, 74:1296-1314.
23. Jeong G.H., Kim S.H. A qualitative cross-impact approach to find the key technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 1997, 55(3):203-214.
24. Kim Y., Suh J., Park S. Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology. Expert Syst. Appl. 1804, 34(2008):1812.
25. Archibugi D., Pianta M. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 1996, 16:451-458.
26. Basberg B.L. Patent statistics and the measurement of technological change: an assessment of the Norwegian patent data, 1840-1980. World Pat. Inf. 1984, 6:158-164.
27. Chen D.-Z., Chang H.-W., Huang M.-H., Fu F.-C. Core technologies and key industries in Taiwan from 1978 to 2002: a perspective from patent analysis. Scientometrics 2005, 64:31-53.
28. Gangulli P. Patents and patent information in 1979 and 2004: a perspective from India. World Pat. Inf. 2004, 26:61-62.
29. Grupp H., Lacasa D., Schmoch U. Tracing technological change over long periods in Germany in chemicals using patent statistics. Scientometrics 2003, 57:175-195.
30. Aunger R. Types of technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2010, 77:762-782.
31. Maqueira-Marín J.M., Bruque-Camera S., Moyáno-Fuentes J. What does grid information technology really mean? Definitions, taxonomy and implications in the organizational field. Technol. Anal. Strateg. 2009, 21(4):491-513.
32. Chen T.Y., Yu O.S., Hsu G.J.Y., Sung W.N. Renewable energy technology portfolio planning with scenario analysis: a case study for Taiwan. Energ. Policy 2009, 37(8):2900-2906.
33. Lin B.W., Chen C.J., Wu H.L. Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. IEEE T. Eng. Manage. 2006, 53(1):17-26.
34. Roth S., Hirschberg S., Bauer C., Burgherr P., Dones R., Heck T., Schenler W. Sustainability of electricity supply technology portfolio. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2009, 36(3):409-416.
35. Shin J., Park Y. Building the national ICT frontier: the case of Korea. Inf. Econ. Policy 2007, 19:249-277.
36. Guan J.C., He Y. Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science - technology linkages. Scientometrics 2007, 72(3):403-425.
37. Meyer M. Patent citations in a novel field of technology - what can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology?. Scientometrics 2000, 48(2):151-178.
38. Yu G., Wang M.Y., Yu D.R. Characterizing knowledge diffusion of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology by citation analysis. Scientometrics 2010, 84(1):81-97.
39. Sood A., James G.M., Tellis G.J. Functional regression: a new model for predicting market penetration of new products. Market. Sci. 2009, 28(1):36-51.
40. Teng J.T.C., Grover V., Guttler W. Information technology innovations: general diffusion patterns and its relationships to innovation characteristics. IEEE T. Eng. Manage. 2002, 49(1):13-27.
41. Rabiner L.R. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 1989, 77(2):257-285.
42. Jordan M.I. Learning in Graphical Models 1999, MIT Press.
43. Baum L.E. An inequality and associated maximization technique in statistical estimation of probabilistic functions of Markov processes. Inequalities 1972, 3:1-8.
44. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 1977, 39(1):1-38.
45. Viterbi A.J. Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE T. Inform. Theory 1967, 13(2):260-269.
46. MacLachlan G., Peel D. Finite Mixture Models 2000, Wiley-Interscience.
47. Schwarz G.E. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 1978, 6:461-464.
48. Jain A.K., Murty M.N., Flynn P.J. Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv. 1999, 31(3):264-323.
49. Tan P., Steinbach M., Kumar V. Introduction to Data Mining 2006, Pearson Education.
50. Jajuga K. A clustering method based on the L1-norm. Computation. Stat. Data Anal. 1987, 5(4):357-371.
51. OECD Measuring Globalization: OECD Handbook on Economic Globalization Indicators 2005, OECD, Paris.
52. OECD OECD Information Technology Outlook 2004 2005, OECD, Paris.
53. Jorgenson D.W., Khuong V. Information technology and the world economy. Scand. J. Econ. 2005, 107(4):631-650.
54. Lee C. Modeling the business value of information technology. Inform. Manage. 2001, 39:191-210.
55. Dedrick J., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K.L. Information technology and economic performance: a critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2003, 35(1):1-28.
56. Gholami R., Guo X., Higón M., Lee S. Information and communications technology (ICT) international spillovers. IEEE T. Eng. Manage. 2009, 56(2):329-340.
57. Kivijarvi H., Saarinen T. Investment in information systems and the financial performance of the firm. Inform. Manage. 1995, 28:143-163.
58. Mukhopadhyay T., Barua A., Kriebel C.H. Information technologies and business value-an analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Syst. Res. 1995, 6(2):3-23.
59. Tam K.Y. The impact of information technology investments on firm performance and evaluation: evidence from newly industrialized economies. Inform. Syst. Res. 1998, 9:85-98.
60. Pohjola M. Information Technology and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Analysis in Information Technology and Economic Development 2001, 242-256. Oxford University Press, New York. M. Pohjola (Ed.).
61. Shin J., Lee W., Park Y. On the benchmarking method of patent-based knowledge flow structure: comparison of Korea and Taiwan with USA. Scientometrics 2006, 69(3):551-574.