The development of a robust design methodology for time-oriented dynamic quality characteristics with a target profile

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 403-414

  Goethals, Paul L ^a   Cho, Byung Rae ^a  

^a Clemson University   (United States)

Author keywords

dynamic quality characteristics; quality; robust design; target profile; time oriented

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC QUALITY; DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; INNOVATIVE ENGINEERING; MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENTS; PROCESS MEAN; PRODUCT QUALITY; QUALITY; QUALITY CHARACTERISTIC; ROBUST DESIGN METHODS; ROBUST DESIGNS; SIMULTANEOUS OPTIMIZATION; TARGET VALUES; TIME-ORIENTED;

INNOVATION; MANUFACTURE; OPTIMIZATION; RESEARCH; SPECIFICATIONS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 79957481299     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.1122     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Taguchi G,. Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing Quality into Products and Processes. Krauss International Publications: New York, NY, 1987.
2. Vining G, Myers R,. Combining taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology 1990; 22: 38-45.
3. Del Castillo E, Montgomery D,. A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. Journal of Quality Technology 1993; 25: 199-204.
4. Lin D, Tu W,. Dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 1995; 27: 34-39.
5. Copeland K, Nelson P,. Dual response optimization via direct function minimization. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28: 331-336. (Pubitemid 126586416)
6. Kim K, Lin D,. Dual response surface optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology 1998; 30 (1): 1-10. (Pubitemid 128594792)
7. Kim Y, Cho BR,. Development of priority-based robust design. Quality Engineering 2002; 14: 355-363. (Pubitemid 34307354)
8. Koksoy O, Doganaksoy N,. Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation using response surface methods. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35: 239-252.
9. Shin S, Cho BR,. Bias-specified robust design optimization and analytical solutions. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2005; 48: 129-148.
10. Lee SB, Park C, Cho BR,. Development of a highly efficient and resistant robust design. International Journal of Production Research 2007; 45: 157-167. (Pubitemid 44837917)
11. Miller A, Wu C,. Commentary on Taguchi's parameter design with dynamic characteristics. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 1996; 12 (2): 75-78.
12. Wasserman G,. Parameter design with dynamic characteristics: A regression perspective. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 1996; 12 (2): 113-117. (Pubitemid 126603463)
13. McCaskey S, Tsui K,. Analysis of dynamic design experiments. International Journal of Production Research 1997; 35 (6): 1561-1574.
14. Joseph V, Wu C,. Performance measures in dynamic parameter design. Journal of Japanese Quality Engineering Society 2002; 10: 82-86.
15. Kapur K, Chen G,. Signal-to-noise ratio development for quality engineering. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2007; 4 (2): 133-141.
16. Lunani M, Nair V, Wasserman G,. Graphical methods for robust design with dynamic characteristics. Journal of Quality Technology 1997; 29 (3): 327-338. (Pubitemid 127617652)
17. Su C, Hsieh K,. Applying neural network approach to achieve robust design for dynamic quality characteristics. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 1998; 15 (5): 509-519.
18. Chen S,. Robust design with dynamic characteristics using stochastic sequential quadratic programming. Engineering Optimization 2003; 35 (1): 79-89.
19. Wu F, Yeh C,. Robust design of multiple dynamic quality characteristics. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2005; 25 (5-6): 579-588. (Pubitemid 40833870)
20. Chatsirirungruang P,. Application of genetic algorithm and Taguchi method in dynamic robust parameter design for unknown problems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2010; 47: 993-1002.
21. Tong L, Wang C, Chen C-T,. Dynamic multiple responses by ideal solution analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2004; 156 (2): 433-444.
22. Wang C, Tong L,. Optimization of dynamic multi-response problems using grey multiple attribute decision making. Quality Engineering 2005; 17 (1): 1-9. (Pubitemid 41222330)
23. Hsieh K, Tong L, Chiu H, Yeh H,. Optimization of a multi-response problem in Taguchi's dynamic system. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2005; 49 (4): 556-571. (Pubitemid 41689979)
24. Derringer G, Suich R,. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology 1980; 12 (4): 214-219.
25. Hsu C, Su C, Liao D,. Simultaneous optimisation of the broadband tap coupler optimal performance based on neural networks and exponential desirability functions. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2004 23: 896-902.
26. Chang H-H,. A data mining approach to dynamic multiple responses in Taguchi experimental design. Expert Systems with Applications 2008; 34: 1095-1103.
27. Fogliatto F,. Multi-response optimization of products with functional quality characteristics. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2008; 24: 927-939.
28. Wu F,. Robust design of nonlinear multiple dynamic quality characteristics. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2009; 56: 1328-1332.
29. Wu C, Hamada M,. Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization. Wiley: New York, NY, 2000.
30. Goethals P, Aragon L, Cho BR,. Experimental investigations of estimated response surface functions with different variability measures. International Journal of Experimental Design and Process Optimisation 2009; 1 (2/3): 123-163.
31. Taguchi G,. A tutorial on quality control and assurance-The Taguchi methods. ASA Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, 1985.
32. Gohel M, Amin A,. Formulation optimization of controlled release diclofenac sodium microspheres using factorial design. Journal of Controlled Release 1998; 51: 115-122. (Pubitemid 28252862)
33. Patel D, Patel N, Patel V, Bhatt D,. Floating granules of ranitidine hydrochloride-gelucire 43/01: Formulation optimization using factorial design. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) PharmSciTech 2007; 8 (2): E1-E7.
34. 3 factorial design. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) PharmSciTech 2009; 10 (3): 977-984.
35. Gohel M, Parikh R, Nagori S, Jena D,. Fabrication of modified release tablet formulation of metoprolol succinate using hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and xanthan gum. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) PharmSciTech 2009; 10 (1): 62-68.