Dynamic multiple responses by ideal solution analysis

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 156, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 433-444

  Tong, Lee Ing ^a   Wang, Chung Ho ^b   Chen, Chih Chien ^c   Chen, Chun Tzu ^d  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Department of Industrial Engineering and Management   (Taiwan)

^c TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY   (Taiwan)

^d UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Dynamic multiple responses; Multiple attribute decision making; Optimization; Principal component analysis; Taguchi method; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; OPTIMIZATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

DYNAMIC MULTIPLE RESPONSE; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING; TAGUCHI METHOD; TOPSIS;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 1442307871     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00017-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ames A.E., Mattucci N., Macdonald S., Szonyi G., Hawkins D.M. Quality loss functions for optimization across multiple response surfaces. Journal of Quality Technology. 29:1997;339-346.
2. Antony J. Multi-response optimization in industrial experiments using Taguchi's quality loss function and principal component analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 16:2000;3-8.
3. Chang S.I., Shivpuri R. A multiple-objective decision-making approach for assessing simultaneous improvement in die life and casting quality in a die casting process. Quality Engineering. 7:1995;371-383.
4. Elsayed E.A., Chen A. Optimal levels of process parameters for products with multiple characteristics. International Journal of Production Research. 31:1993;1117-1132.
5. Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology. 24(471-441):1933;498-520.
6. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Method and Applications. A State-of-the-Art Survey. 1981;Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Logothetis N., Haigh A. Characterizing and optimizing multi-response processes by the Taguchi method. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 4:1988;159-169.
8. Patel R.N., McNamee C.G., Banerjee A., Howell J.M., Robison R.S., Szarka L.J. Stereoselective reduction of β-Keto esters. Geotrichum Candidum. Enzyme Microbial Technology. 14:1992;731-738.
9. Phadke M.S. Quality Engineering Using Robust Design. 1989;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
10. Phadke M.S., Dehnad K. Optimization of product and process design for quality and cost. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 4:1988;159-169.
11. Su C.-T., Tong L.-I. Multi-response robust design by principal component analysis. Total Quality Management. 8:1997;409-416.
12. Tong L.-I., Su C.-T. Optimizing multi-response problems in the Taguchi method by fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 13:1997;25-34.
13. Ushio K., Ebara K., Yamashita T. Selective inhibition of r-enzymes by simple organic acids in yeast-catalysed reduction of ethyl 3-oxobutanoate. Enzyme Microbial Technology. 13:1991;834-839.
14. Wasserman G.S. Parameter design with dynamic characteristics: A regression perspective. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 12:1996;113-117.
15. Wasserman G.S. The use energy-related characteristics in robust product design. Quality Engineering. 10:1998;213-222.
16. Yang K. Improving automotive dimensional quality by using principal component analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 12:1996;401-409.