Multiresponse optimization of products with functional quality characteristics

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 927-939

  Fogliatto, Flavio S ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Desirability function; Functional responses; Hausdorff distance; Multiresponse optimization

Indexed keywords

IMAGE RECOGNITION;

DESIRABILITY FUNCTION; FOOD INDUSTRIES; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES; HAUSDORFF DISTANCE; MULTI RESPONSE; MULTIRESPONSE OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE MEASURES; QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS; SIMILARITY METRIC; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 61349167108     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.939     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (72)

1. Khuri AI, Cornell JA. Response Surfaces (2nd edn). Dekker: New York, 1996.
2. Fogliatto FS, Albin SL. Variance of predicted response as an optimization criterion in multiresponse experiments. Quality Engineering 2000; 12:523-533.
3. Huttenlocher DP, Klanderman GA, Rucklidge WJ. Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1993; 15:850-863.
4. Derringer G, Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology 1980; 12:214-219.
5. Fogliatto FS, Albin SL. An AHP-based procedure for sensory data collection and analysis in quality and reliability applications. Food Quality and Preference 2003; 14:375-385.
6. Lind EE, Goldin J, Hickman JB. Fitting yield and cost response surfaces. Chemical Engineering Progress 1960; 56:62-68.
7. Myers RH, Khuri AI, Vining GG. Response surface alternatives to the Taguchi robust parameter design approach. The American Statistician 1992; 46:131-139.
8. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (2nd edn). Wiley: New York, 2002.
9. Shah HK, Montgomery DC, Carlyle WM. Response surface modeling and optimization in multiresponse experiments using seemingly unrelated regressions. Quality Engineering 2004; 16:387-397.
10. Myers RH, Carter WH Jr. Response surface techniques for dual response surfaces. Technometrics 1973; 15:301-317.
11. Biles WE. A response surface method for experimental optimization of multiresponse processes. Industrial Engineering Chemistry, Process Design and Development 1975; 14:152-158.
12. Del Castillo E. Multiresponse process optimization via constrained confidence regions. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28:61-70.
13. Kim KJ, Lin DKJ. Dual response surface optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology 1998; 30:1-10.
14. Quesada GM, Del Castillo E. A dual-response approach to the multivariate robust parameter design problem. Technometrics 2004; 46:176-187.
15. Berni R, Gonnelli C. Planning and optimization of a numerical control machine in a multiple response case. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2006; 22:517-526.
16. Harrington EC Jr. The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control 1965; 21:494-498.
17. Chang S, Shivpuri R. A multiple-objective decision-making approach for assessing simultaneous improvement in die life and casting quality in a die-casting process. Quality Engineering 1994; 7:371-383.
18. Del Castillo E, Montgomery DC, McCarville DR. Modified desirability functions for multiple response optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28:337-345.
19. Fogliatto FS, Albin SL, Tepper BJ. A hierarchical approach to optimizing descriptive analysis multiresponse experiments. Journal of Sensory Studies 1999; 14:443-465.
20. Fogliatto FS, Albin SL. A hierarchical method for evaluating products with quantitative and sensory characteristics. IIE Transactions 2001; 33:1081-1092.
21. Montgomery DC, Keats JB, Perry LA, Thompson JR, Messina WS. Using statistically designed experiments for process development and improvement. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 2000; 16:55-63.
22. Tyan JC, Du TC, Chen JC, Chang IH. Multiple response optimization in a fully automated FAB: An integrated tool and vehicle dispatching strategy. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2004; 46:121-139.
23. Ortiz F, Simpson JR, Pignatielo JJ Jr, Heredia-Langner A. A genetic algorithm approach to multiple-response optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 2004; 36:432-450.
24. Pasandideh SHR, Niaki STA. Multi-response simulation optimization using genetic algorithm within desirability function framework. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2006; 175:366-382.
25. Pasamontes A, Callao MP. Optimization by means of responses surface of an analytical sequence using a sequential injection system. Talanta 2006; 68:1617-1622.
26. Kim KJ, Lin DKJ. Optimization of multiple responses considering both location and dispersion effects. European Journal of Operational Research 2006; 169:133-145.
27. Wu FC. Optimization of correlated multiple quality characteristics using desirability function. Quality Engineering 2005; 17:119-126.
28. Li J, Ma C, Ma Y, Li Y, Zhou W, Xu P. Medium optimization by combination of response surface methodology and desirability function: An application in glutamine production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2007; 74:563-571.
29. Mukherjee I, Ray PK. Optimal process design of two-stage multiple responses grinding processes using desirability functions and metaheuristic technique. Applied Soft Computing 2008; 8:402-421.
30. Lé on RV, Shoemaker AC, Kacker RN. Performance measures independent of adjustment-An explanation and extension of Taguchi's signal-to-noise ratios. Technometrics 1987; 29:253-265.
31. Logothetis N, Haigh A. Characterizing and optimizing multiresponse processes by the Taguchi method. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 1988; 4:159-169.
32. Elsayed EA, Chen A. Optimal levels of process parameters for products with multiple characteristics. International Journal of Production Research 1993; 31:1117-1132.
33. Fung CP, Kang PC. Multi-response optimization in friction properties of PBT composites using Taguchi method and principal components analysis. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2005; 170:602-610.
34. Khuri AI, Conlon M. Simultaneous optimization of multiple responses represented by polynomial regression functions. Technometrics 1981; 23:363-375.
35. Tribus M, Szonyl G. An alternative view of the Taguchi approach. Quality Progress 1989; 22:46-52.
36. Yum B, Ko S. On parameter design optimization procedures. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 1991; 7:39-46.
37. Raiman LB, Case KE. The development and implementation of multivariate cost of poor quality loss function. IMSE Working Paper, Penn State University, 1992; 92-152.
38. Pignatiello JJ Jr. Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering. IIE Transactions 1993; 25:5-15.
39. Ribeiro JL, Elsayed EA. A case study on process optimization using the gradient loss function. International Journal of Production Research 1995; 33:3233-3248.
40. Lé on NA. A pragmatic approach to multiresponse problems using loss functions. Quality Engineering 1996; 9: 213-220.
41. Vining GG. A compromise approach to multiresponse optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 1998; 30: 309-313.
42. Ribeiro JL, Fogliatto FS, ten Caten CS. Minimizing manufacturing and quality costs in multiresponse optimization. Quality Engineering 2001; 13:559-569.
43. Kulkarni MS, Mariappan V. Multiple response optimization for improved machined surface quality. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2003; 141:174-180.
44. Ko YH, Kim KJ, Jun CH. A new loss function-based method for multiresponse optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 2005; 37:50-59.
45. Yang Y, Chou P. Solving a multiresponse simulation-optimization problem with discrete variables using a multiple-attribute decision-making method. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 2005; 68:9-21.
46. Hsieh KL, Tong LI. Optimization of multiple quality responses involving qualitative and quantitative characteristics in IC manufacturing using neural networks. Computers in Industry 2001; 46:1-12.
47. Lu D, Antony J. Optimization of multiple responses using a fuzzy-rule based inference system. International Journal of Production Research 2002; 40:1613-1625.
48. Cheng CB, Cheng CJ, Lee ES. Neuro-fuzzy and genetic algorithm in multiple response optimization. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 2002; 44:1503-1514.
49. Lin JL, Lin CL. The use of grey-fuzzy logic in the optimization of the manufacturing process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2005; 160:9-14.
50. Antony J, Anand RB, Maneesh M, Tiwari MK. Multiple response optimization using Taguchi methodology and neuro-fuzzy based model. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 2006; 17(7):908-925.
51. Plante RD. Process capability: A criterion for optimizing multiple response product and process design. IIE Transactions 2001; 33:497-509.
52. *pm in multiresponse optimization. Quality Engineering 2005; 17:161-175.
53. Murphy TE, Tsui KL, Allen JK. A review of robust design methods for multiple responses. Research in Engineering Design 2005; 15:201-215.
54. Wurl RC, Albin SL. A comparison of multiresponse optimization: Sensitivity to parameter selection. Quality Engineering 1999; 11:405-416.
55. Kros JF, Mastrangelo CM. Comparing methods for the multi-response design problem. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2001; 17:323-331.
56. Taguchi G. Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing Quality into Products and Processes. Kraus Int. Publ.: White Plains, NY, 1986.
57. Ramsay JO, Silverman BW. Functional Data Analysis (2nd edn). Springer: New York, 2005.
58. Ferraty F, Vieu P. Nonparametric Functional Analysis-Theory and Practice. Springer: New York, 2006.
59. Manteiga WG, Vieu P. Statistics for functional data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2007; 51: 4788-4792.
60. Cardot H, Ferraty F, Sarda P. Functional linear model. Statistics and Probability Letters 1999; 45:11-22.
61. Nair VN, Taam W, Ye KQ. Analysis of functional responses from robust design studies. Journal of Quality Technology 2002; 34:355-370.
62. Govaerts B, Nö el J. Analysing the results of a designed experiment when the response is a curve: Methodology and application in metal injection moulding. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2005; 21:509-520.
63. Shen Q, Xu H. Diagnostics for linear models with functional responses. Technometrics 2007; 49(1):26-33.
64. Kang L, Albin SL. On-line monitoring when the process yields a linear profile. Journal of Quality Technology 2000; 32(4):418-426.
65. Kim K, Mahmoud MA, Woodwall WH. On the monitoring of linear profiles. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35:317-328.
66. Jeong MK, Lu JC, Wang N. Wavelet-based SPC procedure for complicated functional data. International Journal of Production Research 2006; 44(4):729-744.
67. Williams JD, Woodall WH, Birch JB. Statistical monitoring of nonlinear product and process quality profiles. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2007; 23:925-941.
68. Huttenlocher DP, Kedem K. Computing the minimum Hausdorff distance for point sets under translation. Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry (SCG'90), Berkeley, CA, 1990; 340-349.
69. Belogay E, Cabrelli C, Molter U, Shonkwiler R. Calculating the Hausdorff distance between curves. Information Processing Letters 1997; 64:17-22.
70. Castagliola P, Rosa AFP. Monitoring of batch processes with varying durations based on the Hausdorff distance. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 2006; 13(3):213-236.
71. Cornell JA. Experiments with Mixtures: DesignsModels, and Analysis of Mixture Data. Wiley: New York, 1990.
72. Manohar RS, Rao PH. Effect of emulsifiers, fat level and type on the rheological characteristics of biscuit dough and quality of biscuits. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1999; 79:1223-1231.