Graphical methods for robust design with dynamic characteristics

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 327-338

  Lunani, Mahesh ^a   Nair, Vijayan N ^b,d   Wasserman, Gary S ^c,d  

^a FORD MOTOR COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ASQC ^*

Author keywords

Design of Experiments; Graphical Methods; Quality Improvement

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; GRAPHIC METHODS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

STANDARD DEVIATION; TAGUCHI APPROACH;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 0031187029     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1997.11979774     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ALASHE, W. D.; BARNES, E. B.; BATH, K. L.; JACOBSEN, K. E.; and O'KEEFE, M. K. (1994). "Engine Idle Quality Robustness Using Taguchi Methods". Proceedings of the Symposium on Taguchi Methods, American Supplier Institute Press, Dearborn, MI, pp. 111-121.
2. AMERICAN SUPPLIER INSTITUTE (1993). Advanced Course in Quality Engineering. American Supplier Institute Press, Dearborn, MI.
3. BOX, G. E. P. (1988). "Signal-to-Noise Ratios, Performance Criteria, and Transformations" (with discussion). Technometrics 30, pp. 1-40.
4. KACKER, R. N. (1985). "Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Method". Journal of Quality Technology 17, pp. 176-188.
5. LEON, R.; SHOEMAKER, A. C.; and KACKER, R. N. (1987). "Performance Measures Independent of Adjustment: An Explanation and Extension of Taguchi's Signal-to-Noise Ratios" (with discussion). Technometrics 9, pp. 253-285.
6. MILLER, A. and WU, J. C. F. (1994). "Improving a Measurement System Through Designed Experiments". Technical Report No. 224, Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
7. NAIR, V. N. (Editor) (1992). "Taguchi's Parameter Design: A Panel Discussion". Technometrics 34, pp. 127-160.
8. NAIR, V. N. and PREGIBON, D. (1986). "A Data Analysis Strategy for Quality Engineering Experiments". AT&T Technical Journal 65, pp. 73-84.
9. NAIR, V. N. and PREGIBON, D. (1988). Discussion of "Signal-to-Noise Ratios, Performance Criteria, and Transformations". Technometrics 30, pp. 24-30.
10. NAIR, V. N. and SHOEMAKER, A. C. (1990). "The Role of Experimentation in Quality Engineering: A Review of Taguchi's Contributions" in Statistical Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments edited by Subir Ghosh, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp. 247-277.
11. PHADKE, M. S. (1989). Quality Engineering Using Robust Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12. TAGUCHI, G. (1991a). Taguchi Methods, Research and Development Vol. 1. American Suppliers Institute Press, Dearborn, MI.
13. TAGUCHI, G. (1991b). Taguchi Methods. Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Quality Evaluation, Vol. 3. American Supplier Institute Press, Dearborn, MI.
14. VINING, G. G. and MYERS, R. H. (1990). "Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Surface Approach". Journal of Quality Technology 22, pp. 38-45.
15. WELCH, W. J.; YU, T. K.; KANG, S. M.; and SACKS, J. (1990). "Computer Experiments for Quality Control by Parameter Design". Journal of Quality Technology 22, pp. 15-22.
16. WINTERBOTTOM, A. (1992). "The Use of Generalized Signal-to-Noise Ratio to Identify Adjustment and Dispersion Factors in Taguchi Experiments". Quality and Reliability Engineering International 8, pp. 45-56.