DNA polymorphism in recombining and non-recombing mating-type-specific loci of the smut fungus Microbotryum

Heredity

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 936-944

  Votintseva, A A ^a   Filatov, D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

DNA polymorphism; Microbotryum; recombination; selfing

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; DNA; FLOWER; FUNGUS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HERB; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION GENETICS; RECOMBINATION;

ARTICLE; BASIDIOMYCETES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; SEX CHROMOSOME;

BASIDIOMYCOTA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENETIC LOCI; GENETICS, POPULATION; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION; SEX CHROMOSOMES;

EUROPE;

ANIMALIA; FUNGI; MICROBOTRYUM; MICROBOTRYUM VIOLACEUM; SILENE; SILENE LATIFOLIA;

EID: 79956350379     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.140     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bucheli E, Gautschi B, Shykoff JA (2001). Differences in population structure of the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum on two closely related host species, Silene latifolia and S dioica. Mol Ecol 10: 285-294. (Pubitemid 32232337)
2. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D (1993). The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134: 1289-1303. (Pubitemid 23220050)
3. Charlesworth B, Nordborg M, Charlesworth D (1997). The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genet Res 70: 155-174. (Pubitemid 28021578)
4. Charlesworth D (2006). Balancing selection and its effects on sequences in nearby genome regions. PLoS Genet 2: e64.
5. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (2005). Sex chromosomes: evolution of the weird and wonderful. Curr Biol 15: R129-R131. (Pubitemid 40263356)
6. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Morgan MT (1995). The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics 141: 1619-1632.
7. De Vienne DM, Refregier G, Hood ME, Guigue A, Devier B, Vercken E et al. (2009). Hybrid sterility and inviability in the parasitic fungal species complex Microbotryum. J Evol Biol 22: 683-698.
8. Denchev CM, Giraud T, Hood ME (2009). Three new species of anthericolous smut fungi on Caryophyllaceae. Mycologica Balcanica 6: 79-84.
9. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611-2620. (Pubitemid 40886055)
10. Felsenstein J (1974). The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78: 737-756.
11. Filatov DA (2009). Processing and population genetic analysis of multigenic datasets with ProSeq3 software. Bioinformatics 25: 3189-3190.
12. Filatov DA, Moneger F, Negrutiu I, Charlesworth D (2000). Low variability in a Y-linked plant gene and its implications for Y-chromosome evolution. Nature 404: 388-390. (Pubitemid 30164339)
13. Fraser JA, Diezmann S, Subaran RL, Allen A, Lengeler KB, Dietrich FS et al. (2004). Convergent evolution of chromosomal sex-determining regions in the animal and fungal kingdoms. PLoS Biol 2: e384.
14. Garber ED, Eng C, Stevens DM (1987). Genetics of Ustilago violacea. XXI. Centromere-linkage values and pericentric gene clustering. 12: 555-560.
15. Gaut BS, Wright SI, Rizzon C, Dvorak J, Anderson LK (2007). Recombination: an underappreciated factor in the evolution of plant genomes. Nat Rev Genet 8: 77-84. (Pubitemid 46006052)
16. Giraud T (2004). Patterns of within population dispersal and mating of the fungus Microbotryum violaceum parasitizing the plant Silene latifolia. Heredity 93: 559-565. (Pubitemid 39606218)
17. Giraud T, Jonot O, Shykoff JA (2005). Selfing propensity under choice conditions in a parasitic fungus, Microbotryum violaceum, and parameters influencing infection success in artificial inoculations. Int J Plant Sci 166: 649-657. (Pubitemid 40886847)
18. Giraud T, Yockteng R, Lopez-Villavicencio M, Refregier G, Hood ME (2008). Mating system of the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum: selfing under heterothallism. Eukaryot Cell 7: 765-775. (Pubitemid 351968820)
19. Glass NL, Vollmer SJ, Staben C, Grotelueschen J, Metzenberg RL, Yanofsky C (1988). DNAs of the two mating-type alleles of Neurospora crassa are highly dissimilar. Science 241: 570-573.
20. Granberg A, Carlsson-Graner U, Arnqvist P, Giles B (2008). Variation in breeding system traits within and among populations of Microbotryum violaceum on Silene dioica. Int J Plant Sci 169: 293-303. (Pubitemid 351230641)
21. Hill WG, Robertson A (1966). The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res 8: 269-294.
22. Hood ME (2002). Dimorphic mating-type chromosomes in the fungus Microbotryum violaceum. Genetics 160: 457-461. (Pubitemid 34194521)
23. Hood ME, Antonovics J (2004). Mating within the meiotic tetrad and the maintenance of genomic heterozygosity. Genetics 166: 1751-1759. (Pubitemid 38621057)
24. Hood ME, Antonovics J, Koskella B (2004). Shared forces of sex chromosome evolution in haploid-mating and diploid-mating organisms: Microbotryum violaceum and other model organisms. Genetics 168: 141-146. (Pubitemid 39346585)
25. Hudson RR (1987). Estimating the recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection. Genet Res 50: 245-250. (Pubitemid 18042123)
26. Hudson RR (2002). Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18: 337-338. (Pubitemid 34183119)
27. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL (1985). Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111: 147-164. (Pubitemid 16248827)
28. Hudson RR, Kreitman M, Aguade M (1987). A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116: 153-159.
29. Ironside JE, Filatov DA (2005). Extreme population structure and high interspecific divergence of the Silene Y chromosome. Genetics 171: 705-713. (Pubitemid 43156458)
30. James TY, Liou SR, Vilgalys R (2004). The genetic structure and diversity of the A and B mating-type genes from the tropical oyster mushroom, Pleurotus djamor. Fungal Genet Biol 41: 813-825. (Pubitemid 38829191)
31. Kelly JK (1997). A test of neutrality based on interlocus associations. Genetics 146: 1197-1206. (Pubitemid 27291000)
32. Kim S, Plagnol V, Hu TT, Toomajian C, Clark RM, Ossowski S et al. (2007). Recombination and linkage disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet 39: 1151-1155. (Pubitemid 47340659)
33. Larracuente AM, Sackton TB, Greenberg AJ, Wong A, Singh ND, Sturgill D et al. (2008). Evolution of protein-coding genes in Drosophila. Trends Genet 24: 114-123.
34. Le Gac M, Hood ME, Fournier E, Giraud T (2007). Phylogenetic evidence of host-specific cryptic species in the anther smut fungus. Evolution 61: 15-26. (Pubitemid 46417339)
35. Lengeler KB, Fox DS, Fraser JA, Allen A, Forrester K, Dietrich FS et al. (2002). Mating-type locus of Cryptococcus neoformans: a step in the evolution of sex chromosomes. Eukaryot Cell 1: 704-718. (Pubitemid 36557730)
36. Lewontin R (1964). The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations: heterotic models. Genetics 49: 49-67.
37. Librado P, Rozas J (2009). DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451-1452.
38. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J (1974). The hitchhiking effect of a favourable gene. 23: 23-35.
39. Menkis A, Jacobson DJ, Gustafsson T, Johannesson H (2008). The mating-type chromosome in the filamentous ascomycete Neurospora tetrasperma represents a model for early evolution of sex chromosomes. PLoS Genet 4: e1000030.
40. Pannell JR, Charlesworth B (2000). Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355: 1851-1864. (Pubitemid 32116947)
41. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959. (Pubitemid 30397141)
42. Rice WR (1987). Genetic hitchhiking and the evolution of reduced genetic activity of the Y sex chromosome. Genetics 116: 161-167.
43. Rockman MV, Kruglyak L (2009). Recombinational landscape and population genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet 5: e1000419.
44. Ruddat M., Kokontis J, Birch L, Garber ED, Chiang K-S, Campanella J et al. (1991). Interactions of Microbotryum violaceum (Ustilago violacea) with its host plant Silene alba. Plant Science 80: 157-165.
45. Scheet P, Stephens M (2006). A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am J Hum Genet 78: 629-644.
46. Tajima F (1983). Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105: 437-460. (Pubitemid 14247444)
47. Tajima F (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595. (Pubitemid 19274682)
48. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007). MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596-1599. (Pubitemid 47236692)
49. Uyenoyama MK (2005). Evolution under tight linkage to mating type. New Phytol 165: 63-70. (Pubitemid 40033166)
50. Votintseva AA, Filatov DA (2009). Evolutionary strata in a small mating-type-specific region of the smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum. Genetics 182: 1391-1396.
51. Watterson G (1975). On the number of segregating sites in genetic models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol 7: 256-276.
52. Yi S, Charlesworth B (2000). Contrasting patterns of molecular evolution of the genes on the new and old sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda. Mol Biol Evol 17: 703-717. (Pubitemid 30252258)
53. Yockteng R, Marthey S, Chiapello H, Gendrault A, Hood ME, Rodolphe F et al. (2007). Expressed sequences tags of the anther smut fungus, Microbotryum violaceum, identify mating and pathology genes. BMC Genomics 8: 272.
54. Zambino P, Groth JV, Lukens L, Garton JR, May G (1997). Variation at the b mating type locus of Ustilago maydis. Phytopathology 87: 1233-1239. (Pubitemid 27521956)