Improvement of analogical reasoning and academic achievements by the Analogical Reasoning Programme (ARP)

Educational and Child Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 71-94

  Tzuriel, David ^a   George, Tami ^b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956153987     PISSN: 02671611     EISSN: 23968702     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.) (2001). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and School. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
2. Brown, A.L. (1989). Analogical learning and transfer: What develops? In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.) Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 369–412). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Brown, A.L., Kane, M.J. & Long, C. (1989). Analogical transfer in young children: Analogies as tools for communication and exposition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 275–293.
4. Büchel, F.P., Schlatter, C. & Scharnhorst, U. (1997). Training and assessment of analogical reasoning in students with sever learning difficulties. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 83–94.
5. Csapó, B. (1997). The development of inductive reasoning: Cross-sectional assessments in an educational context. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 609-626.
6. Das Gupta, P. & Bryant, P.E. (1989). Young children’s causal inferences. Child Development, 60, 1138–1146.
7. Davydov, V.V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (Original work published 1972).
8. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y. & Hoffman, M. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
9. Gallagher, J. & Wright, R.J. (1977). Children’s solution of verbal analogies: Extension of Piaget’s concept of reflexive abstraction. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.
10. Gallagher, J.M. & Wright, R.J. (1979). Piaget and the study of analogy: Structural analysis of items. In J. Magary (Ed.), Piaget and the helping professions (Vol. 8). Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
11. Galperin, P.Y. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In M. Cole & I. Maltzman (Eds.) A handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology (pp. 34–61). New York: Basic Books.
12. Galperin, P.Y. (1982). Intellectual capabilities among older preschool children: On the problem of training and mental development. In W.W. Hartup (Ed.) Review of child development research (Vol. 6, pp. 526–546). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Gentner, D. & Markman, A.B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45–56.
14. Gick, M.L. & Holyoak, K.J. (1987). The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In S.M. Cormier & J.D. Hagman (Eds.) Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and application (pp. 9–45). New York: Academic Press.
15. Glaser, R. (1987). Learning theory and theories of knowledge. In E. De Corte, H. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier & P. Span (Eds.) Learning and instruction (Vol. 1, pp. 397–413). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
16. Goldman, S.R., Pellegrino, J.W., Parseghian, P.E. & Sallis, R. (1982). Developmental and individual differences in verbal analogical reasoning. Child Development, 53, 550–559.
17. Goswami, U. (1989). Relational complexity and the development of analogical reasoning. Cognitive Development, 4, 251–268.
18. Goswami, U. (1991). Analogical reasoning: What develops? A review of research and theory. Child Development, 62, 1–22.
19. Goswami, U. (1992). Analogical reasoning in children. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Goswami, U. (1995). Transitive relational mappings in three-and four-year-olds: The analogy of goldilocks and the three bears. Child Development, 66, 877–892.
21. Goswami, U. & Brown, A.L. (1989). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition, 35, 69–95.
22. Guberman, S.R. & Greenfield, P.M. (1991). Learning and transfer in everyday cognition. Cognitive Development, 6, 233–260.
23. Halford, G.S. (1993). Children’s understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2002). Dynamic test to assess learning capacity in people with severe impairments. American Journal in Mental Retardation, 107, 340–351.
25. Holyoak, K.J. & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Holyoak, K.J. & Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52, 35–44.
27. Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
28. Karpov, Y. (2003a). Vygotsky’s doctrine of scientific concepts. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev & S. Miller (Eds.) Vygotsky’s wducational theory in cultural context (pp. 65–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Karpov, Y. (2003b). Internalization of children’s problem solving and individual differences in learning. Cognitive Development, 18, 377–398.
30. Kidron, R. (1992). Basic maths tasks: Diagnostic-didactic test. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, Special Education Department.
31. Klauer, K.J. & Phye, G.D. (1994). Cognitive training for children. A developmental program of inductive reasoning and problem solving. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
32. Klauer, K.J., Willmes, K. & Phye, G.D. (2002). Inducing inductive reasoning:Does it transfer to fluid intelligence? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 1–25.
33. Klauer, K.J. & Phye, G.D. (2008). Inductive reasoning. A training approach. Review of Educational Research, 78, 85–123.
34. Levinson. P.J. & Carpenter, R.L. (1974). An analysis of analogical reasoning in children. Child Development, 45, 857–861.
35. Lidz, C.S. & Thomas, C. (1987). The preschool learning assessment device: Extension of a static approach. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 288—326). New York: Guilford.
36. Lifshitz, H., Tzemach M., Tzuriel D. & Weiss, I. (2009). A new model of mapping the difficulties in solving analogical problems among adolescents and adults with intellectual disability, Unpublished paper, Bar Ilan University.
37. Lifshitz, H., Tzuriel, D. & Weiss, I. (2005). Effects of training in conceptual versus perceptual analogies among adolescents and adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5, 144–167 (Online: http://www.iace.coged.org/journal).
38. Lifshitz, H., Tzuriel, D., Weiss, I. & Vakil, E. (2009). Eye Movement behavior and information processing in solving analogical problems: A comparison between intellectually disabled and typically developed adolescents and adults. Unpublished paper, Bar-Ilan University.
39. Lunzer, E.A. (1965). Problems of formal reasoning in test situations. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), European research in child development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 30 (2, Serial No. 100).
40. Missiuna, C. & Samuels, M. (1989). Dynamic assessment of preschool children in special education with special needs: Comparison of mediation and instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 1–22.
41. Noy, B. (1975). Sheur hamischakim: Chelek mimaarechet halimudim beveit hasefer [The games lesson: Curriculum component in the school]. Chavat Daat, 5, 49–54.
42. Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
43. Piaget, J., Montangero, J. & Billeter, J. (1977). Les correlates. In J. Piaget (ed.), L’abstraction reflechissante. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
44. Ortar, G. (1987). Hava Nikra: Mivchan Be’havanat Hanikra [Let’s Read: Reading Comprehension Test for Schools]. Jerusalem: Achiever. (Hebrew).
45. Raven, J.C. (1956). Guide to using the colored progressive matrices, Sets A, Ab, and B. London: H.K. Lewis.
46. Resing, W.C.M. (1997). Learning potential assessment: The alternative for measuring intelligence? Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 68–82.
47. Resing, W.C.M. (2000). Assessing the learning potential for indicative reasoning (LIR) in young children. In C.S. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.) Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 229–262). New York: Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
48. Richardson, K. & Webster, D.A. (1996). Analogical reasoning and the nature of context: A research note. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 23–32.
49. Robertson, J. (1993). Verbal analogical reasoning in severely learning disabled and normally developing children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 283–298.
50. Samuels, M.T. (1998). Review of Tzuriel, D. & Klein, P. The Children’s Analogical Thinking Modifiability Test (CATM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16, 270–274.
51. Sagerman, N. & Mayer, R.E. (1987). Forward transfer of different reading strategies evoked by adjunct questions in science text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 189–191.
52. Siegler, R.S. (2006). Microgenetic analysis of learning. In W. Damon R.M. Lerner, D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.) Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language, Vol. 2 (6th ed., pp. 464-510). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
53. Siegler, R.S. & Svetina, M. (2002). A microgenetic/ cross-sectional study of matrix completion: Comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development, 73, 793–809.
54. Singley, K. & Anderson, J.R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353–378.
56. Sternberg R.J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 137–170.
57. Sternberg, R.J. & Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies. Child Development, 51, 27–38.
58. Sternberg, R.J. & Rifkin, B. (1979). The development of analogical reasoning processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 195–232.
59. Tunteler, E. & Resing, W.C.M. (2007a). Effects of prior assistance in using analogies on young children’s unprompted analogical problem solving over time: A microgenetic study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 43–68.
60. Tunteler, E. & Resing, W.C.M. (2007b). Change in spontaneous analogical transfer over time in young children: A microgenetic study. Infant and child development, 16, 71–94.
61. Tunteler, E. Pronk, C.M.E. & Resing, W.C.M. (2008). Inter-and intra-individual variability in the process of change in the use of analogical strategies to solve geometric tasks in children: A microgenetic analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 44–60.
62. Tzuriel, D. (1995). The cognitive modifiability battery (CMB): Assessment and intervention-instruction manual. School of Education, Bar Ilan University.
63. Tzuriel, D. (1997). A novel dynamic assessment approach for young children: Major dimensions and current research. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 83–102.
64. Tzuriel, D. (2000a). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 385–435.
65. Tzuriel, D. (2000b). The cognitive modifiability battery: Assessment and intervention. In C.S. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.) Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 375–406). New York: Else-vier Science.
66. Tzuriel, D. (2001a). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
67. Tzuriel, D. (2001b). Dynamic assessment is not dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 237–249.
68. Tzuriel, D. (2002a). The Conceptual and Perceptual Analogical Modifiability (CCPAM) Test: Construction analogies – Instruction manual. School of Education, Bar-Ilan University.
69. Tzuriel, D. (2002b). Dynamic assessment of learning potential. Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 127–131). New York: McMillan Press.
70. Tzuriel, D. (2007). Transfer effects of teaching conceptual versus perceptual analogies. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6, 194–217. (Online: http://www.iace.coged.org/journal).
71. Tzuriel, D. & Caspi, N. (1992). Dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability in deaf and hearing preschool children. Journal of Special Education, 26, 235–252.
72. Tzuriel, D. & Ernst, H. (1990). Mediated learning experience and structural cognitive modifiability: Testing of distal and proximal factors by structural equation model. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 119–135.
73. Tzuriel, D. & Flor, H. (in preparation). Prediction of emergent literacy by analogical thinking modifiability among kindergarten children. School of Education, Bar Ilan University.
74. Tzuriel, D. & Galinka, E. (2000). The Conceptual and Perceptual Analogical Modifiability (CCPAM) Test: Closed Analogies-Instruction Manual. School of Education, Bar-Ilan University.
75. Tzuriel, D. & George, T. (2006). The Analogical Reasoning Program (ARP) for young children based on the Analogies of the Cognitive Modifiability Battery: Assessment and Intervention. Bar-Ilan University. Unpublished paper.
76. Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Kanner, E. & Haywood, H.C. (1999). The effectiveness of Bright Start program in kindergarten on transfer abilities and academic achievements. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 114, 111–141.
77. Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Zeliger, M., Friedman, A. & Haywood, H.C. (1998). Effects of the ‘Bright Start’ program in kindergarten on use of mediated learning strategies and children’s cognitive modifiability. Child Development and Care, 143, 1–20.
78. Tzuriel, D. & Kaufman, R. (1999). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability: Dynamic assessment of young Ethiopian immigrants in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 539–552.
79. Tzuriel, D. & Klein, P.S. (1985). The assessment of analogical thinking modifiability among regular, special education, and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 539–552.
80. Tzuriel, D. & Klein, P.S. (1990). The Children’s Analogical Thinking Modifiability (CATM) test – Instruction manual. School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
81. Tzuriel, D. & Zilber, D. (in preparation). Prediction of readiness for math by conceptual and perceptual analogies. School of Education, Bar Ilan University.
82. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83. White, C.S. & Alexander, P.A. (1986). Effects of training on four-year-olds’ ability to solve geometric analogy problems. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 261–268.