The development of inductive reasoning: Cross-sectional assessments in an educational context

International Journal of Behavioral Development

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 609-626

  Csapó, Beno ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000604548     PISSN: 01650254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/016502597385081     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Csapó, B. (1992). Improving Operational Abilities in Children. In A. Demetriou, M. Shayer, & A. Efklides (Eds.), Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development. Implications and applications for education (pp. 144-159). London: Routledge.
2. Csapó, B. (1993, June). Development of inductive reasoning in adolescence. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Congress of World Association for Educational Research, Jerusalem, Israel.
3. Csapó, B. (1994). Az induktív gondolkodás fejlodése [Development of inductive reasoning]. Magyar Pedagógia, 94, 53-80.
4. Egan, G.E., & Greeno, J.G. (1974). Theory of rule induction: Knowledge acquired in concept learning, serial pattern learning and problem solving. In L.W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition (pp. 43-104). Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
5. Ennis, R.H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J.B. Baron, & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills (pp. 9-26). New York: W.H. Freeman.
6. Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
7. Gelman, S.A., & Markman, E.M. (1987). Young children's inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development, 58, 1532-1541.
8. Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
9. Gilhooly, K.J. (1982). Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative. London: Academic Press.
10. Halford, G.S., & Boulton-Lewis, G.M. (1992). Value and limitations of analogies in teaching mathematics. In A. Demetriou, M. Shayer, & A. Efklides (Eds.), Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development. Implications and applications (pp. 183-209). London: Routledge.
11. Holland, J.H., Holyoak, K.J., Nisbett, R.E., & Thagard, P.R. (1986). Induction. Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Holyoak, K.J. (1985). The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 59-87). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13. Johnson- Laird, P.N. (1988). A taxonomy of thinking. In R.J. Sternberg & E.E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 429-457). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Keeves, J.P. (1992). The IEA study of science III. Changes in science education and achievement: 1970 to 1984. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
15. Klauer, K.J. (1989). Teaching for analogical transfer as a means of improving problem-solving, thinking and learning. Instructional Science, 18, 179-192.
16. Klauer, K.J. (1990). A process theory of inductive reasoning tested by the teaching of domain-specific thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5, 191-206.
17. Kuhn, D. (1989). Making cognitive development research relevant to education. In W. Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 261-287). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Lawson, A.E., Karplus, R., & Adi, H. (1978). The acquisition of propositional logic and formal operational schemata during the secondary school years. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15, 465-478.
19. Markman, E.M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children. Problems of Induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A.D., & Carraher, D.W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Pellegrino, J.W., & Glaser, R. (1982). Analyzing aptitudes for learning: inductive reasoning. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 269-345). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
22. Phye, G.D. (1989). Schemata training and transfer of an intellectual skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 347-352.
23. Phye, G.D. (1990). Inductive problem solving. Schema inducement and memory-based transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 826-831.
24. Popper, K.R. (1972). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon.
25. Resing, W.C.M. (1993). Measuring inductive reasoning skills: The construction of a learning potential test. In J.H.M. Hammers, K. Sijstma, & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment. theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 219-242). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
26. Ropo, E. (1987). Skills for learning: A review of studies on inductive reasoning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31, 31-39.
27. Shy, S. (1988). Inductive and deductive reasoning: A structural reanalysis of ability tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 308-311.
28. Simon, H. (1974). Problem solving and rule induction: a unified view. In L.W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition (pp. 105-128). Potomac, MA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
29. Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing and analogical reasoning: The component analysis of human ability. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
30. Sternberg, R.J. (1986). Toward a unified theory of human reasoning. Intelligence, 10, 281-314.
31. Sternberg, R.J., & Gardner, M. (1983). Unities in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 80-116.
32. Sternberg, R.J., & Wagner, R.K. (Eds.) (1994). Mind in context. Interactional perspectives of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Tissink, J., Hamers, J.H.M., & van Luit, J.E.H. (1993). Learning potential tests with domain-general and domain-specific tasks. In J.H.M. Hammers, K. Sijstma, & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment. Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 243-266). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
34. Wason, P.C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.