Perspectives on dichotic listening and the corpus callosum

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 225-232

  Musiek, Frank E ^a   Weihing, Jeffrey ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory processing disorder; Corpus callosum; Dichotic; Multiple sclerosis; Myelin; Split brain

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN DYSFUNCTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MATURATION; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DICHOTIC LISTENING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC RISK; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROPATHOLOGY; PRESBYACUSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SPLIT BRAIN; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS;

EID: 79955960721     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. American Academy of Audiology (2010). Clinical practice guidelines - Diagnosis, treatment, and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder.
2. American Speech Language Hearing Association (2005). Central auditory processing disorders - Working group on auditory processing disorders.
3. Bamiou D., Davies R., Jones S., Musiek F., Rudge P., Stevens J., et al. An unusual case of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy with auditory processing difficulties as the first and sole clinical manifestation. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2004, 15:152-160.
4. Bamiou D., Free S., Sisodiya S., Chong M., Musiek F., Williamson K., et al. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2007, 161:463-469.
5. Bamiou D., Musiek F., Sisodiya S., Free S., Davies R., Moore A., et al. Deficient auditory interhemispheric transfer in patients with PAX6 mutations. Annals of Neurology 2004, 56:503-509.
6. Bamiou D., Sisodiya S., Musiek F., Luxon L. The role of the interhemispheric pathway in hearing. Brain Research Review 2007, 56:170-182.
7. Baran J., Musiek F. Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system. Contemporary perspectives in hearing assessment 1999, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA. F. Musiek, W. Rintelmann (Eds.).
8. Baran J., Musiek F., Reeves A. Central auditory function following anterior sectioning of the corpus callosum. Ear & Hearing 1986, 7:359-362.
9. Barkhof F., Elton M., Lindeboom J., Tas M., Schmidt W., Hommes O., et al. Functional correlates of callosal atrophy in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients. A preliminary MRI study. Journal of Neurology 1998, 245:153-158.
10. Bastin M., Munoz Maniega S., Ferguson K., Brown L., Wardlaw J., MacLullich A., et al. Quantifying the effects of normal ageing on white matter structure using unsupervised tract shape modelling. Neuroimage 2010, 51:1-10.
11. Bellis T., Billiet C., Ross J. Hemispheric lateralization of bilaterally presented homologous visual and auditory stimuli in normal adults, normal children, and children with central auditory dysfunction. Brain & Cognition 2008, 66:280-289.
12. Bellis T., Wilber L. Effects of aging and gender on interhemispheric function. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research 2001, 44:246-263.
13. Benavidez D., Fletcher J., Hannay H., Bland S., Caudal S. Corpus callosum damage and interhemispheric transfer of information following closed head injury in children. Cortex 1999, 35:315-336.
14. Berlin C., Cullen J., Hughes L., Berlin H., Lowe-Bell S., Thompson C. Dichotic processing of speech: Acoustic and phonetic variables. Proceedings of a symposium on central auditory processing disorders 1975, 36-46. Univ. of Nebraska Medical Center. M. Sullivan (Ed.).
15. Berlin C., Lowe-Bell S., Jannetta P., Kline D. Central auditory deficits after temporal lobectomy. Archives of Otolaryngology 1972, 96:4-10.
16. Berrick J., Shubow G., Schultz M., Freed H., Fournier S., Hughes J. Auditory processing tests for children: Normative and clinical results on the SSW test. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1984, 49:318-325.
17. Bissell J., Clark F. Dichotic listening performance in normal children and adults. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1984, 38:176-183.
18. Bloom J., Hynd G. The role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric transfer of information: Excitation or inhibition?. Neuropsychology Review 2005, 15:59-71.
19. Cameron S., Dillon H. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): Comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2008, 19:377-391.
20. Carter A., Noe C., Wilson R. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2001, 12:261-272.
21. Chermak G., Musiek F. Central auditory processing disorders - New perspectives 1997, Singular Publishing Group, San Diego.
22. Chmiel R., Jerger J., Murphy E., Pirozzolo F., Tooley-Young C. Unsuccessful use of binaural amplification by an elderly person. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1997, 8:1-10.
23. Clarke J., Lufkin R., Zaidel E. Corpus callosum morphometry, and dichotic listening performance: Individual differences, in functional inter hemispheric inhibition. Neuropsychologia 1993, 31:547-557.
24. Cox R.M., Schwartz K.S., Noe C.M., Alexander G.C. Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients. Ear & Hearing 2011, 32(2):181-197.
25. Efron R. The central auditory system and issues related to hemispheric specialization. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction 1985, Williams & Wilkins, New York. M. Pinheiro, F. Musiek (Eds.).
26. Ferrario V., Sforza C., Serrao G., Frattini T., Del Favero C. Shape of the human corpus callosum in childhood. Elliptic Fourier analysis on midsagitall magnetic resonance scans. Investigative Radiology 1996, 21:1-5.
27. Gadea M., Marti-Bonmati L., Arana E., Espert R., Casanova V., Pascual A. Dichotic listening and corpus callosum magnetic resonance imaging in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis with emphasis on sex differences. Neuropsychology 2002, 16:275-281.
28. Gadea M., Marti-Bonmati L., Arana E., Espert R., Salvador A., Casanova B. Corpus callosum function in verbal dichotic listening: Inferences from a longitudinal follow up of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Brain and Language 2009, 110:101-105.
29. Gelfand S., Hoffman S., Waltzman S., Piper N. Dichotic CV recognition at various interaural temporal onset asynchronies: Effect of age. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1980, 68:1258-1261.
30. Gootjes L., Bouma A., Van Strien J., Van Schijndel R., Barkhof F., Scheltens P. Corpus callosum size correlates with asymmetric performance on a dichotic listening task in healthy aging but not in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:208-217.
31. Gootjes L., Van Strien J., Bouma A. Age effects in identifying and localizing dichotic stimuli: A corpus callosum deficit. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology 2004, 26:826-837.
32. Greenwald R., Jerger J. Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry on a competing speech task. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2001, 12:167-173.
33. Hall J., Goldstein M. Representation of binaural stimuli by single units in primary auditory cortex of unanesthetized cats. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1968, 43:456-461.
34. Henkin Y., Waldman A., Kishon-Rabin L. The benefits of bilateral versus unilateral amplification for the elderly: Are two always better than one?. Journal of Basic Clinical Physiological Pharmacology 2007, 18:201-216.
35. Holmes A. Bilateral amplification for the elderly: Are two aids better than one?. International Journal of Audiology 2003, 42S2:63-67.
36. Hubel D., Wiesel T. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. Journal of Physiology 1970, 206:419-436.
37. Ivone F., Schochat E. Auditory processing maturation in children with and without learning difficulties. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica 2005, 17:311-320.
38. Jacobson J., Deppe U., Murray T. Dichotic paradigms in multiple sclerosis. Ear & Hearing 1983, 4:311-317.
39. Jancke L., Steinmetz H. Interhemispheric transfer time and corpus callosum size. Neuroreport 1994, 21:2385-2388.
40. Jerger J., Alford B., Lew H., Rivera V., Chmiel R. Dichotic listening, event related potentials and interhemispheric transfer in the elderly. Ear & Hearing 1995, 16:482-498.
41. Jerger J., Chmiel R., Allen J., Wilson A. Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear & Hearing 1994, 15:274-286.
42. Jerger J., Martin J., McColl R. Interaural cross correlation of event related potentials and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of auditory processing disorder: A case study. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2004, 15:79-87.
43. Jerger J., Moncrieff D., Greenwald R., Wambacq I., Siepel A. Effect of age on interaural asymmetry of event related potentials in a dichotic listening task. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2000, 11:383-389.
44. Jerger J., Silman S., Lew H., Chmiel R. Case studies in binaural interference: Converging evidence from behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1993, 4:122-131.
45. Jerger J., Thibodeau L., Martin J., Mehta J., Tillman G., Greenwald R., et al. Behavioral and electrophysiologic evidence of auditory processing disorder: A twin study. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2002, 13:438-460.
46. Keshavan M., Diwadkar V., DeBellis M., Dick E., Kotwal R., Rosenberg D., et al. Development of the corpus callosum in childhood: Adolescence and early adulthood. Life Science 2002, 70:1909-1922.
47. Kimura D. Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1961, 15:156-165.
48. Kobler S., Lindblad A., Olofsson A., Hagerman B. Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: Differences and similarities in binaural performance. International Journal of Audiology 2010, 49:613-627.
49. Lassonde M., Sauerwein H., Lepore F. Agenesis of the corpus callosum. The parallel brain: The cognitive neuroscience of the corpus callosum 2003, MIT Press, Cambridge. E. Zaidel, M. Iacoboni (Eds.).
50. Lindeboom J., Horst R. Interhemispheric disconnection effects in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1988, 51:1445-1447.
51. Luders E., Thompson P., Toga A. The development of the corpus callosum in the healthy human brain. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:10985-10990.
52. Martin J., Jerger J., Mehta J. Divided attention and directed attention listening modes in children with dichotic deficits: An event related potential study. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2007, 18:34-53.
53. Meyers J., Roberts R., Bayless J., Volkert K., Evitts P. Dichotic listening: Expanded norms and clinical application. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2002, 17:79-90.
54. Moncrieff D., Wertz D. Auditory rehabilitation for interaural asymmetry: Preliminary evidence of improved dichotic listening performance following intensive training. International Journal of Audiology 2008, 47:84-97.
55. Morell R., Brewer C., Ge D., Snieder H., Zalewski C., King K., et al. A twin study of auditory processing indicates that dichotic listening ability is a stronger heritable trait. Human Genetics 2007, 122:103-111.
56. Moulden A., Persinger M. Delayed left ear accuracy during childhood and early adolescence as indicated by Roberts' Dichotic Word Listening Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2000, 90:893-898.
57. Musiek F., Baran J. The auditory system - Anatomy, physiology, and clinical correlates 2006, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
58. Musiek F., Baran J., Pinheiro M. Neuroaudiology: Case studies 1994, Singular Publishing, San Diego.
59. Musiek F., Baran J., Shinn J. Assessment and remediation of an auditory processing disorder associated with head trauma. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2004, 15:117-132.
60. Musiek F., Geurkink N. Auditory perceptual problems in children: Considerations for the otolaryngologist and audiologist. Laryngoscope 1980, 90:962-971.
61. Musiek F., Gollegly K. Maturational considerations in the neuroauditory evaluation of children. Hearing impairment in children 1988, York Press, Maryland. H. Bess (Ed.).
62. Musiek F., Kurdziel-Schwan S., Kibbe K., Gollegly K., Baran J., Rintelmann W. The dichotic rhyme task: Results in split brain patients. Ear & Hearing 1989, 10:33-39.
63. Musiek F., Pinheiro M. Dichotic speech tests in the detection of central auditory dysfunction. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction - Foundations and clinical correlates 1985, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. M. Pinheiro, F. Musiek (Eds.).
64. Musiek F., Reeves A., Baran J. Release from central auditory competition in the split brain patient. Neurology 1985, 35:983-987.
65. Musiek F., Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders - A case study. Seminars in Hearing 1998, 19:357-366.
66. Musiek F., Wilson D. SSW and dichotic digit results pre- and post- commissurotomy: A case report. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1979, 44:528-533.
67. Musiek F., Wilson D., Pinheiro M. Audiological manifestations in split brain patients. Journal of the American Auditory Society 1979, 5:25-29.
68. Pandya D., Karol E., Heibronn D. The topographical distribution of interhemispheric projections in the corpus callosum of the rhesus monkey. Brain Research 1971, 32:31-43.
69. Pelletier J., Habib M., Lyon-Caen O., Salamon G., Poncet M., Khalil R. Functional and magnetic resonance imaging correlates of callosal involvement in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology 1993, 50:1077-1082.
70. Pelletier J., Schuchet L., Witjas T., Habib M., Guttmann C., Salamon G., et al. A longitudinal study of callosal atrophy and interhemispheric dysfunction in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology 2001, 58:105-111.
71. Pinheiro M., Musiek F. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction - Foundations and clinical correlates 1985, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
72. Pinheiro F., Oliveria A., Cardoso A., Capellini S. Dichotic listening tests in students with learning disabilities. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2010, 76:257-262.
73. Pohl P., Grubmuller H., Grubmuller R. Developmental changes in dichotic right ear advantage (REA). Neuropediatrics 1984, 15:139-144.
74. Rao S., Bernardin L., Leo G., Ellington L., Ryan S., Burg L. Cerebral disconnection in multiple sclerosis. Relationship to atrophy of the corpus callosum. Archives of Neurology 1989, 46:918-920.
75. Rauch R., Jinkins J. Analysis of cross-sectional area measurements of the corpus callosum adjusted for brain size in male and female subjects from childhood to adulthood. Behavioral Bran Research 1994, 64:65-78.
76. Raz N., Ghisletta P., Rodrigue K., Kennedy K., Lindenberger U. Trajectories of brain aging in middle aged and older adults: Regional and individual differences. Neuroimage 2010, 51:501-511.
77. Repp B. Identification of dichotic fusions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1976, 60:459-469.
78. Rimol L., Eichele T., Hugdahl K. The effect of voice onset time on dichotic listening with consonant-vowel syllables. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:191-196.
79. Rosenzweig M. Representations of two ears at the auditory cortex. American Journal of Physiology 1951, 167:147-158.
80. Rubens A., Froehling B., Slater G., Anderson D. Left ear suppression on verbal dichotic tests in patients with multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 1985, 18:459-463.
81. Sala S., Agosta F., Pagani E., Copetti M., Comi G., Filippi M. Microstructural changes and atrophy in brain white matter tracts with aging. Neurobiology and Aging 2010, 29.
82. Schochat E., Musiek F., Alonso R., Ogata J. Effect of auditory training on the middle latency response in children with (central) auditory processing disorder. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 2010, 43:777-785.
83. Sharma M., Purdy S., Kelly A. Comorbidity of auditory processing, language, and reading disorders. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research 2009, 52:702-722.
84. Shinn J., Baran J., Moncrieff D., Musiek F. Differential attention effects on dichotic listening. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2005, 16:205-218.
85. Speaks C., Blecha M., Schilling M. Contributions of monotic intelligibility to dichotic performance. Ear & Hearing 1980, 5:259-266.
86. Springer S., Sidtis J., Wilson D., Gazzaniga M. Left ear performance in dichotic listening following commissurotomy. Neuropsychologica 1978, 16:305-312.
87. Strouse A., Wilson R., Brush N. Recognition of dichotic digits under pre-cued and post-cued response conditions in young and elderly listeners. British Journal of Audiology 2000, 34:141-151.
88. Sugishita M., Otomo K., Yamazaki K., Shimizu H., Yoshioka M., Shinohara A. Dichotic listening in patients with partial section of the corpus callosum. Brain 1995, 118:417-427.
89. Sullivan E., Rohlfing T., Pfefferbaum A. Longitudinal study of callosal microstructure in the normal adult aging brain using quantitative DTI fiber tracking. Developmental Neuropsychology 2010, 35:233-256.
90. Sullivan E., Rohlfing T., Pfefferbaum A. Quantitative fiber tracking of lateral and interhemispheric white matter systems in normal aging: Relations to timed performance. Neurobiology of Aging 2010, 31:464-481.
91. Teipel S., Miendl T., Wagner M., Stieltjes B., Reuter S., Hauenstein K., et al. Longitudinal changes in fiber tract integrity in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment: A DTI follow-up study. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2010, 22:507-522.
92. Tunturi A. A study of the pathway from the medial geniculate body to the acoustic cortex in the dog. American Journal of Physiology 1946, 147:311-319.
93. Vanniasegaram I., Cohen M., Rosen S. Evaluation of selected auditory tests in school age children suspected of auditory processing disorders. Ear & Hearing 2004, 25:586-597.
94. Weihing J., Musiek F. Dichotic interaural intensity difference (DIID) training - Principles and procedures. Auditory processing disorders - Assessment, management, and treatment 2007, Plural Publishing, San Diego. D. Geffner, D. Ross-Swain (Eds.).
95. Westerhausen R., Hugdahl K. The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: A review of clinical and experimental evidence. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review 2008, 32:1044-1054.
96. Westerhausen, R., Luders, E., Specht, K., Ofte, S. H., Toga, A. W., Thompson, P. M., et al. (2010). Structural and functional reorganization of the corpus callosum between the age of 6 and 8 years. Cerebral Cortex [Epub ahead of print].
97. Wiesel T., Hubel D. Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology 1965, 28:1060-1072.
98. Wilde E., Chu Z., Bigler E., Hunter J., Fearing M., Hanten G., et al. Tensor imaging in the corpus callosum in children after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 2006, 10:1412-1426.
99. Wishart H., Strauss E., Hunter M., Moll A. Interhemispheric transfer in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1995, 17:937-940.
100. Yakovlev P., LeCours D. Myelogenetic cycles of regional maturation of the brain. Regional development of the brain in early life 1965, F.A. Davis, Philadelphia. A. Minkowski (Ed.).
101. Yazgan M., Wexler B., Kinsbourne M., Peterson B., Leckman J. Functional significance of individual variations in callosal area. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:769-779.