Hemispheric lateralization of bilaterally presented homologous visual and auditory stimuli in normal adults, normal children, and children with central auditory dysfunction

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 280-289

  Bellis, Teri James ^a,b   Billiet, Cassie ^a   Ross, Jody ^a  

^a W O Farber Center for Civic Leadership   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Central auditory processing disorder; Corpus callosum; Dichotic listening; Hemispheric asymmetry; Interhemispheric transfer; Laterality; Right ear advantage; Visual field advantage

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY DISEASES, CENTRAL; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 39749147139     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aiello S., Sotgiu S., Sau G.F., Manca S., Conti M., and Rosati G. Long latency evoked potentials in a case of corpus callosum agenesis. Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences 15 (1995) 497-505
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). (2005). (Central) auditory processing disorders (technical report). Available at: http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
3. American National Standards Institute. (2004). Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-2004). New York: Author.
4. Beeman M. Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse. Brain and Language 44 (1993) 80-120
5. Bellis T.J. Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting: From science to practice (2003), Thomson Learning, Clifton Park, NY
6. Bellis T.J., and Ferre J.M. Multidimensional approach to the differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders in children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 10 (1999) 319-328
7. Bellis T.J., and Wilber L.A. Effects of aging and gender on interhemispheric function. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research 44 (2000) 246-263
8. Berlin C., Hughes L., Lowe-Bell S., and Berlin H. Dichotic right ear advantage in children 5 to 13. Cortex 9 (1973) 393-401
9. Besner D., Daniels S., and Slade C. Ideogram reading and right hemisphere language. British Journal of Psychology 73 (1982) 21-28
10. Boles D.B. Hemispheric interaction in visual field asymmetry. Cortex 19 (1983) 99-113
11. Boles D.B. Parameters of the bilateral effect. In: Kitterle F.L. (Ed). Hemispheric communication: Mechanisms and models (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 211-230
12. Bryden M.P. Laterality: Functional asymmetry in the intact brain (1982), Academic Press, New York
13. Cacace A.T., and McFarland D.J. The importance of modality specificity in diagnosing central auditory processing disorder. American Journal of Audiology 14 (2005) 112-123
14. Cedrus Corporation (1999). SuperLab pro experimental laboratory software, version 2.0. Phoenix, AZ.
15. Chermak G.D., Bellis T.J., and Musiek F.E. Neurobiology, cognitive science, and intervention. In: Chermak G.D., and Musiek F.E. (Eds). Handbook of central auditory processing disorder: Treatment Vol. 2 (2006), Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA
16. Clarke J.M., and Zaidel E. Anatomical-behavioral relationships: Corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization. Behavioural Brain Research 64 (1994) 185-202
17. Colvin M.K., Funnell M.G., and Gazzaniga M.S. Numerical processing in the two hemispheres: Studies of a split-brain patient. Brain and Cognition 57 (2005) 43-52
18. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ
19. Cowell P., and Hugdahl K. Individual differences in neurobehavioral measures of laterality and interhemispheric function as measured by dichotic listening. Developmental Neuropsychology 18 (2000) 95-112
20. Dehaene S. Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition 14 (1992) 1-42
21. Dehaene S. Cerebral bases of number processing and calculation. In: Gazzaniga M. (Ed). The new cognitive neurosciences (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 987-998
22. Dehaene S., and Cohen L. Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex 33 (1997) 219-250
23. Gazzaniga M.S., Smylie C.S., Baynes K., Hirst W., and McCleary C. Profiles of right hemisphere language and speech following brain bisection. Brain and Language 22 (1984) 206-220
24. Hatta T. Development of visual field advantage for digit and random shape identification: Comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Neuropsychologia 38 (1990) 1053-1062
25. Hines D. Recognition of verbs, abstract nouns and concrete nouns from the left and right visual half-fields. Neuropsychologia 14 (1976) 211-216
26. Hugdahl K., Bronnick K., Kyllingsbaek S., Law I., Gade A., and Paulson O.B. Brain activation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instrument stimuli: A 150-PET study. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 431-440
27. Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology 15 (1961) 166-171
28. Krutsch A.J., and McKeever W.F. Cross-modal correlation of dichotic and tachistoscopic language laterality tasks: The importance of familial sinistrality. Brain and Language 38 3 (1990) 384-397
29. McFarland D.J., and Cacace A.T. Modality specificity as a criterion for diagnosing central auditory processing disorders. American Journal of Audiology 4 (1995) 32-44
30. McKeever W.F., and Huling M.D. Lateral dominance in tachistoscopic word recognition performance obtained with simultaneous bilateral input. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 15-20
31. Milner B., Taylor S., and Sperry R. Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man. Science 161 (1968) 184-185
32. Musiek F.E. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digits test revisited. Ear and Hearing 4 (1983) 79-83
33. Musiek F.E., Bellis T.J., and Chermak G.D. Nonmodularity of the central auditory nervous system (CANS): Implications for (central) auditory processing disorder. American Journal of Audiology (2005)
34. Musiek F.E., Gollegly K.M., and Baran J.A. Myelination of the corpus callosum and auditory processing problems in children: Theoretical and clinical correlates. Seminars in Hearing 5 (1984) 231-241
35. Musiek F.E., and Reeves A. Effects of partial and complete corpus callosotomy on central auditory function. In: Lepore F., Ptito M., and Jasper H.H. (Eds). Two hemispheres-one brain: Functions of the corpus callosum (1986), Alan R. Liss, New York 432-433
36. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
37. Olk B., and Hartje W. The bilateral effect: Callosal inhibition or intrahemispheric competition?. Brain and Cognition 45 (2001) 317-324
38. Raczkowski D., Kalat J.W., and Nebes R. Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items. Neuropsychologia 12 (1974) 43-47
39. Ratinckx E., Brysabaert M., and Reynvoet B. Bilateral field interactions and hemispheric asymmetry in number comparison. Neuropsychologia 39 (2001) 335-345
40. Repp B.H. Measuring laterality effects in dichotic listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62 3 (1977) 720-737
41. Sparks R., and Geschwind N. Dichotic listening in man after section of neocortical commissures. Cortex 4 (1968) 3-16
42. Tervaniemi M., and Hugdahl K. Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions. Brain Research Reviews 43 (2003) 231-246
43. Voyer D. On the magnitude of laterality effects and sex differences in functional lateralities. Laterality 1 (1996) 51-83
44. Voyer D., and Boudreau V.G. Cross-modal correlation of auditory and visual language laterality tasks: A serendipitous finding. Brain and Cognition 53 (2003) 393-397
45. Westerhausen R., Kreuder F., Dos Santos Sequeira S., Walter C., Woerner W., Wittling R.A., Schweiger E., and Wittling W. The association of macro- and microstructure of the corpus callosum and language lateralization. Brain and Language 97 (2006) 80-90
46. Willeford J.A., and Burleigh J.M. Sentence procedures in central testing. In: Katz J. (Ed). Handbook of clinical audiology. 4th ed. (1994), Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 256-268
47. Wioland N., Rudolf G., Metz-Lutz M.N., Mutschler V., and Marescaux C. Cerebral correlates of hemispheric lateralization during a pitch discrimination task: An ERP study in dichotic situation. Clinical Neurophysiology 110 (1999) 516-523
48. Wexler B.E., and King G.P. Within-modal and cross-modal consistency in the direction and magnitude of perceptual asymmetry. Neuropsychologia 28 (1990) 71-80