Deficient auditory interhemispheric transfer in patients with PAX6 mutations

Annals of Neurology

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 503-509

  Bamiou, Doris Eva ^a   Musiek, Frank E ^b   Sisodiya, Sanjay M ^a   Free, Samantha L ^a   Davies, Rosalyn A ^a   Moore, Anthony ^c   Van Heyningen, Veronica ^d   Luxon, Linda M ^a,e  

^a NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Human Genetics Unit   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PAX6;

ADULT; ANTERIOR COMMISSURE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERHEMISPHERIC TRANSFER; MALE; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN DISEASES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CORPUS CALLOSUM; EYE PROTEINS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEARING TESTS; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUTATION; PAIRED BOX TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 4844224530     PISSN: 03645134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ana.20227     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. van Heyningen V, Williamson KA. PAX6 in sensory development. Hum Mol Genet 2002;11:1161-1167.
2. Sisodiya SM, Free SL, Williamson KA, et al. PAX6 haploinsufficiency causes cerebral malformation and olfactory dysfunction in humans. Nat Genet 2001;28:214-216.
3. Talamillo A, Quinn JC, Collinson JM, et al. Pax6 regulates regional development and neuronal migration in the cerebral cortex. Dev Biol 2003;255:151-163.
4. Jones L, López-Bendito G, Gruss P, et al. Pax6 is required for the normal development of the forebrain axonal connections. Development 2002;129:5041-5052.
5. Hevner RF, Miyashita-Lin E, Rubenstein JLR. Cortical and thalamic axon pathfinding defects in Tbr1, Gbx2 and Pax6 mutant mice: evidence that cortical and thalamic axons interact and guide each other. J Comp Neurol 2002;447:8-17.
6. Di Virgilio G, Clarke S, Pizzolato G, Schaffner T. Cortical regions contributing to the anterior commissure in man. Exp Brain Res 1999;124:1-7.
7. Bamiou DE, Musiek FE, Free S, et al. Evidence of defective auditory interhemispheric transfer in a patient with the PAX6 mutation and aplasia of the anterior commissure. Neurology 2004;62:489-490.
8. Pandya DN, Seltzer B. The topography of commissural fibers. In: Leporé F, Ptito M, Jasper HH, eds. Two hemispheres-one brain. Functions of the corpus callosum. New York: Alan Liss, 1986:47-73.
9. Temple CM, Jeeves MA, Vilarroya OO. Reading in callosal agenesis. Brain Lang 1990;39:235-253.
10. Lepore F, Lassonde M, Poirier P. Midline sensory integration in callosal agenesis. In: Lassonde M, Jeeves MA, eds. Callosal agenesis. A natural split brain. Advances in behavioural biology. Vol 42. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1994:155-170.
11. Santhouse AM, Ffytche DH, Howard RJ, et al. The functional significance of perinatal corpus callosum damage: an fMRI study in young adults. Brain 2002;125:1782-1792.
12. Lessard N, Leporé F, Villemagne J, Lassonde M. Sound localization in callosal agenesis and early callosotomy subjects: brain reorganization and/or compensatory strategies. Brain 2002;125: 1039-1053.
13. Sauerwein HC, Nolin P, Lassonde M. Cognitive functioning in callosal agenesis. In: Lassonde M, Jeeves MA, eds. Callosal agenesis. A natural split brain? Advances in behavioural biology. Vol 42. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1994:221-234.
14. Temple CM, Ilsley J. Sounds and shapes: language and spatial cognition in callosal agenesis. In: Lassonde M, Jeeves MA, eds. Callosal agenesis. A natural split brain? Advances in behavioural biology. Vol 42. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1994: 261-274.
15. Jacobson I, Jeeves MA. A new syndrome: familial fronto-nasal dermoid cysts with agenesis of the corpus callosum. In: Lassonde M, Jeeves MA, eds. Callosal agenesis. A natural split brain? Advances in behavioural biology. Vol 42. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1994:39-54.
16. Musiek FE, Reeves A. Effects of partial and complete corpus callosotomy on central auditory function. In: Leporè F, Ptito M, Jasper HH, eds. Two hemispheres-one brain. Functions of the corpus callosum. New York: Alan Liss, 1986:423-434.
17. Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML, Wilson DH. Auditory pattern perception in "split brain" patients. Arch Otolaryngol 1980;106: 610-612.
18. Risse GI, LeDouxJ, Springer SP, et al. The anterior commissure in man: functional variation in a multisensory system. Neuropsychologia 1978;16:23-31.
19. McKeever WF, Sullivan KF, Ferguson SM, Rayport M. Typical cerebral hemisphere diconnection deficits following corpus callosum section despite sparing of the anterior commissure. Neuropsychologia 1981;19:745-755.
20. Fischer M, Ryan SB, Dobyns WB. Mechanisms of interhemispheric transfer and patterns of cognitive function in acallosal patients of normal intelligence. Arch Neurol 1992;49:271-277.
21. Free SL, Mitchell, TN, Williamson KA, et al. Quantitative MR image analysis in subjects with defects in the PAX6 gene. NeuroImage 2003;20:2281-2290.
22. British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for pure tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol 1981;15:213-216.
23. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear1990;11:93-105.
24. Hurley RM, Musiek FE. Effectiveness of tranbsient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in predicting hearing level. J Am Acad Audiol 1994;5:195-203.
25. Musiek FE. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the Dichotic Digit Test revisited. Ear Hear 1983;4:79-83.
26. Noffsinger D, Martinez CD, Wilson RH. Dichotic listening to speech: background and preliminary data for digits, sentences, and nonsense syllables. J Am Acad Audiol 1994;5:248-254.
27. Wexler BE, Halwes T. Increasing the power of dichotic methods: the fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia 1983; 21:59-66.
28. Musiek FE. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 1994;5:265-268.
29. Musiek FE, Baran JA, Pinheiro ML. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology 1990;29:304-313.
30. Thompson P, Mitchell TN, Free SL, et al. Cognitive findings in humans with mutations in PAX6. Neurology 2004;62: 1216-1218.
31. Musiek FE. Neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and central auditory assessment. Part III: Corpus callosum and efferent pathways. Ear Hear 1986;7:349-358.
32. Foxman BT, Oppenheim J, Petito CK, Gazzaniga MS. Proportional anterior commissure area in humans and monkeys. Neurology 1986;36:1513-1517.
33. Price CJ, Winterburn D, Giraud AI, et al. Cortical localisation of the visual and auditory word form areas: a reconsideration of the evidence. Brain Lang 2003;86:272-286.
34. Poeppel D, Guillemin A, Thompson J, et al. Auditory lexical decision, categorical perception, and FM direction discrimination differentially engage left and right auditory cortex. Neuropsychologia 2004;42:183-200.
35. Bey CE, Zatorre RJ. Recognition of interleaved melodies. An fMRI study. Ann NY Acad Sci 2003;999:152-154.
36. Cipolloni PB, Pandya DN. Topography and trajectories of commissural fibers of the superior temporal region in the rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res 1985;57:381-389.
37. Musiek FE, Kudziel-Schwan S, Kibbe KS, et al. The Dichotic Rhyme test: results in split brain patients. Ear Hear 1989;10: 33-39.
38. Zaidel E. Callosal dynamics and right hemisphere language. In: Leporè F, Ptito M, Jasper HH, eds. Two hemispheres-one brain. Functions of the corpus callosum. New York: Alan Liss, 1986: 435-461.
39. Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML. Dichotic speech tests in the detection of central auditory dysfunction. In: Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE, eds. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Wakerly Press, 1985:201-218.
40. Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE. Sequencing and temporal ordering in the auditory system. In: Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE, eds. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Wakerly Press, 1985:219-238.
41. Sugishita M, Otomo K, Yamazaki K, et al. Dichotic listening in patients with partial section of the corpus callosum. Brain 1995;118:417-427.
42. Baran JA, Musiek FM, Reeves AG. Central auditory function following anterior sectioning of the corpus callosum. Ear Hear 1987;7:359-362.
43. Griffiths TD, Johnsrude I, Dean JL, Green GG. A common neural substrate for the analysis of pitch and duration pattern in segmented sound? Neuroreport 1999;10:3825-3830.
44. Jäncke L. Does "callosal relay" explain ear advantage in dichotic monitoring? Laterality 2002;7:309-320.
45. Jäncke L, Shah NJ. Does dichotic listening probe temporal lobe functions? Neurology 2002;58:736-743.
46. Quigley M, Cordes D, Turski P, et al. Role of the corpus callosum in functional connectivity. Am J Neuroradiol 2003: 208-212.
47. Tollman S, Maertens M, von Cramon DY, et al. Dichotic listening in patients with splenial and non-splenial callosal lesions. Neuropsychology 2002;16:56-64.
48. Callaerts P, Halder G, Gehring WJ. PAX-6 in development and evolution. Annu Rev Neurosci 1997;20:483-532.
49. Mitchell TN, Free SL, Williamson KA, et al. Polymicrogyria and absence of pineal gland due to PAX6 mutation. Ann Neural 2003;53:658-663.
50. Rauch RA, Jinkins JR. Magnetic resonance imaging of corpus callosum dysgenesis. In: Lassonde M, Jeeves MA, eds. Callosal agenesis. A natural split brain? Advances in behavioural biology. Vol 42. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1994: 83-96.
51. Sarnat HB. Disorders of the lamina terminalis: midline malformations of the forebrain. In: Sarnat HB, ed. Cerebral dysgenesis. Embryology and clinical expression. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
52. Jerger J, Alford B, Lew H, et al. Dichotic listening, event-related potentials, and interhemispheric transfer in the elderly. Ear Hear 1995;16:482-498.