Effect of auditory training on the middle latency response in children with (central) auditory processing disorder

Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 777-785

  Schochat, E ^a   Musiek, F E ^b   Alonso, R ^a   Ogata, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory processing; Auditory training; Central auditory processing disorder; Evoked potentials; Middle latency response

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY BRAIN STEM IMPLANT; AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING DISORDER; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSE; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 77957142015     PISSN: 0100879X     EISSN: 1414431X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X2010007500069     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kraus N, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Zecker SG, Nicol TG, Koch DB. Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science 1996; 273: 971-973.
2. Jirsa RE. The clinical utility of the P3 AERP in children with auditory processing disorders. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 903-912.
3. Musiek FE, Gollegly KM, Kibbe KS, Verkest SB. Current concepts on the use of ABR and auditory psychophysical tests in the evaluation of brain stem lesions. Am J Otol 1988; 9 (Suppl): 25-35.
4. Purdy SC, Kelly AS, Davies MG. Auditory brainstem response, middle latency response, and late cortical evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 367-382.
5. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders [Technical Report]; 2005. www.asha.org/docs/html/TR2005-00043.html. Accessed June 29, 2010.
6. Jerger J, Musiek F. Report of the Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis of Auditory Processing Disorders in School- Aged Children. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 467-474.
7. Martin BA, Tremblay KL, Korczak P. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear 2008; 29: 285-313.
8. Tremblay KL. Training-related changes in the brain: evidence from human auditory-evoked potentials. Semin Hear 2007; 28: 120-132.
9. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B. Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 79-90.
10. Tremblay K, Kraus N, Carrell TD, McGee T. Central auditory system plasticity: generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 3762-3773.
11. Kraus N. Speech sound perception, neurophysiology, and plasticity. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999; 47: 123-129.
12. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, Sharma A, Nicol T. Mismatch negativity to speech stimuli in school-age children. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1995; 44: 211-217.
13. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T. The time course of auditory perceptual learning: neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training. Neuroreport 1998; 9: 3557-3560.
14. Menning H, Roberts LE, Pantev C. Plastic changes in the auditory cortex induced by intensive frequency discrimination training. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 817-822.
15. Klein SK, Kurtzberg D, Brattson A, Kreuzer JA, Stapells DR, Dunn MA, et al. Electrophysiologic manifestations of impaired temporal lobe auditory processing in verbal auditory agnosia. Brain Lang 1995; 51: 383-405.
16. Hayes EA, Warrier CM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Kraus N. Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114: 673-684.
17. Fujioka T, Ross B, Kakigi R, Pantev C, Trainor LJ. One year of musical training affects development of auditory cortical-evoked fields in young children. Brain 2006; 129: 2593-2608.
18. Jerger J, Johnson K. Interactions of age, gender, and sensorineural hearing loss on ABR latency. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 168-176.
19. Milicic D, Alcada MN, Pais CL, Vecerina-Volic S, Jurkovic J, Pais CM. A study of auditory afferent organization in children with dyslalia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 46: 43-56.
20. Marvel JB, Jerger JF, Lew HL. Asymmetries in topographic brain maps of auditory-evoked potentials in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1992; 3: 361-368.
21. Musiek FE, Baran JA, Schochat E. Selected management approaches to central auditory processing disorders. Scand Audiol Suppl 1999; 51: 63-76.
22. Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Central auditory processing disorders. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group San Diego; 1997.
23. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders; 2005. www.asha.org/policy. Accessed June 29, 2010.
24. Carhart R, Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 1959; 24: 330-345.
25. Jerger S, Jerger S. The Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test (PSI). St. Louis: Auditec of St. Louis; 1984.
26. Pereira LD, Schochat E. Processamento auditivo central: manual de avaliação. São Paulo: Lovise; 1997.
27. Katz J. The SSW test: an interim report. J Speech Hear Disord 1968; 33: 132-146.
28. Musiek FE. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear 1983; 4: 79-83.
29. Thornton RD. Instrumental and recording parameters in auditory- evoked potentials. In: Burkard RF, Don M, Eggermont JJ (Editors), Auditory evoked potentials: Basic principles and clinical application. Baltimore: Lipincott Willians & Wilkins; 2007.
30. Musiek FE, Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders. Sem Hear 1998; 19: 357-366.
31. Musiek FE, Shinn J, Hare C. Plasticity, auditory training and auditory processing disorders. Sem Hear 2002; 23: 263-275.
32. Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, Johnston P, Schreiner C, Miller SL, Tallal P. Temporal processing deficits of languagelearning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science 1996; 271: 77-81.
33. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, King C, Littman T, Nicol T. Discrimination of speech-like contrasts in the auditory thalamus and cortex. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2758-2768.
34. Kileny P, Paccioretti D, Wilson AF. Effects of cortical lesions on middle-latency auditory evoked responses (MLR). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 66: 108-120.
35. Arehole S, Augustine LE, Simhadri R. Middle latency response in children with learning disabilities: preliminary findings. J Commun Disord 1995; 28: 21-38.
36. Musiek FE, Kibbe K, Baran JA. Neuroaudiological results from split-brain patients. Sem Hear 1984; 5: 219-230.
37. Jerger J, Alford B, Lew H, Rivera V, Chmiel R. Dichotic listening, event-related potentials, and interhemispheric transfer in the elderly. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 482-498.
38. Tremblay KL, Kraus N. Auditory training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45: 564-572.
39. Musiek FE, Berge BE. A neuroscience view of auditory training/ stimulation and central auditory processing disorders. In: Masters MG, Stecker NA, Katz J (Editors), Central auditory - processing disorders mostly management. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1988. p 15-24.