Visual effects of haptic feedback are large but local

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Meng, Xin ^a   Zaidi, Qasim ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TACTILE STIMULATION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOUCH; VISION;

FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TOUCH; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79955926639     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019877     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adams WJ, Graf EW, Ernst MO, (2004) Experience can change the "light-from-above" prior. Nature Neuroscience 7: 1057-1058.
2. Ernst MO, Banks MS, Bülthoff HH, (2000) Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience 3: 69-73.
3. Li A, Zaidi Q, (2000) Perception of 3D shape from texture is based on patterns of oriented energy. Vision Research 40: 217-242.
4. Li A, Zaidi Q, (2003) Observer strategies in perception of 3-D shape from isotropic textures: developable surfaces. Vision Research 43: 2741-2758.
5. Li A, Zaidi Q, (2004) Three-dimensional shape from non-homogeneous textures: carved and stretched surfaces. Journal of Vision 4: 860-878.
6. Berkeley G, (1702) An Essay towards a New Theory of Vision Dublin & London.
7. Zaidi Q, (2011) Visual inferences of material changes: color as clue and distraction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science (In press).
8. Ernst MO, Banks MS, (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-33.
9. Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB, Young MJ, (1995) Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 35: 389-412.
10. Griffiths AF, Zaidi Q, (1998) Rigid objects that appear to bend. Perception 27: 799-802.
11. Rock I, Victor J, (1964) Vision and Touch: An Experimentally Created Conflict between the Two Senses. Science 143: 594-596.
12. Heller MA, (1992) Haptic dominance in form perception: vision versus proprioception. Perception 21: 655-660.
13. Newell F, Ernst MO, Tjan BS, Bülthoff H, (2001) Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science 12: 37-42.
14. Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH, (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 162-9.
15. Violentyev A, Shimojo S, Shams L, (2005) Touch-induced visual illusion. Neuroreport 16: 1107-1110.
16. Blake R, Sobel KV, James TW, (2004) Neural synergy between kinetic vision and touch. Psychological Science 15: 397-402.
17. Lunghi C, Binda P, Morrone MC, (2010) Touch disambiguates rivalrous perception at early stages of visual analysis. Current Biology 20: R143-4.
18. Maunsell JH, Sclar G, Nealey TA, DePriest DD, (1991) Extraretinal representations in area V4 in the macaque monkey. Visual Neuroscience 7: 561-73.
19. Stein BE, Stanford TR, (2008) Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9: 255-66.
20. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Servos P, Menon RS, et al. (2002) Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia 40: 1706-14.
21. Amedi A, Malach R, Hendler T, Peled S, Zohary E, (2001) Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience 4: 324-30.
22. Driver J, Noesselt T, (2008) Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on 'sensory-specific' brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron 57: 11-23.
23. Yamane Y, Carlson ET, Bowman KC, Wang Z, Connor CE, (2008) A neural code for three-dimensional object shape in macaque inferotemporal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 11: 1352-60.