Perception of three-dimensional shape from texture is based on patterns of oriented energy

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 217-242

  Li, Andrea ^a   Zaidi, Qasim ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Contour; Curvature; Oriented energy; Perspective; Shape from texture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LUMINANCE; MODEL; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; STIMULUS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TECHNIQUE; VISUAL SYSTEM;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0033991628     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00169-8     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ames, A., Jr. (1951) Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window. Psychological Monograph, 65 (7), Whole No. 324.
2. Bajcsy R., Lieberman L. Texture gradient as a depth cue. Computer Graphics and Image Processing. 5:1976;52-67.
3. Bergen J.R., Adelson E.H. Visual texture segmentation based on energy measures. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 3:1986;98.
4. Bergen J.R., Landy M.S. Computational modeling of visual texture segregation. Landy M.S., Movshon J.A. Computational models of visual processing. 1991;MIT Press, Cambridge.
5. Blake A., Bulthoff H.H., Sheinberg D. Shape from texture: ideal observers and human psychophysics. Vision Research. 33(2):1993;1723-1737.
6. Braunstein M.L., Payne J.W. Perspective and form ratio as determinants of relative slant judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 81(3):1969;584-590.
7. Brodatz P. Textures: a photographic album for artists and designers. 1966;Dover, New York.
8. Cummings B.G., Johnston E.B., Parker A.J. Effects of different texture cues on curved surfaces viewed stereoscopically. Vision Research. 33:1993;827-838.
9. Cutting J.E., Millard R.T. Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 113(2):1984;196-216.
10. Dakin S.C., Hess R.F. Spatial-frequency tuning of visual contour integration. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 15(6):1998;1486-1499.
11. Field D.J., Hayes A., Hess R.F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local 'association field'. Vision Research. 33(2):1993;173-193.
12. Gallogly D.P., Geisler W.S. Contour integration occurs along various stimulus dimensions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (Supplement). 39(4):1998;S847.
13. Gibson J.J. The perception of visual surfaces. American Journal of Psychology. 63:1950;367-384.
14. Gillam, B. (1970). Judgments of slant on the basis of foreshortening. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, II, 3134.
15. Gillam B. The perception of spatial layout from static optical information. Epstein W., Rogers S. Perception of space and motion. 1995;Academic Press, New York.
16. Goodenough B., Gillam B. Gradients as visual primitives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23(2):1997;370-387.
17. Graham N. Visual pattern analyzers. 1989;Oxford, New York.
18. Graham N., Sutter A. Spatial summation in simple (Fourier) and complex (non Fourier) texture channels. Vision Research. 38(2):1998;231-257.
19. Gray A. Modern differential geometry of curves and surfaces with mathematica. 2nd ed. 1998;CRC Press, New York.
20. Griffiths, A. F., & Zaidi, Q. (1999). Perceptual assumption and projective distortions in a three-dimensional shape illusion. Perception (in press).
21. Heeger D.J. Half-squaring in responses of cat striate cells. Journal of Neuroscience. 9:1992;427-443.
22. Ittelson W.H. The Ames demonstrations in perception. 1952;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
23. Knill D.C. Surface orientation from texture: ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues. Vision Research. 38:1998;1655-1682.
24. Knill D.C. Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: human and ideal observers compared. Vision Research. 38:1998;1683-1711.
25. Knill D.C. Ideal observer perturbation analysis reveals human strategies for inferring surface orientation from texture. Vision Research. 38:1998;2635-2656.
26. Krumm J., Shafer S.A. Segmenting textured 3D surfaces using the space/frequency representation. Spatial Vision. 8(2):1994;281-308.
27. Li, A., & Zaidi, Q. Three-dimensional shapes conveyed by natural textures. Journal of the Optical Society of America A (submitted).
28. Li, A. & Zaidi, Q. Three-dimensional shape from real and illusory contours (in preparation).
29. Malik J., Rosenholtz R A computational model for shape from texture. Ciba Foundation Symposium. 184:1994;272-282.
30. Mamassian P., Landy M. Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings. Vision Research. 38:1998;2817-2832.
31. Reed T.R., Wechsler H. Segmentation of textured images and Gestalt organization using spatial/spatial-frequency representations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 12(1):1990;1-12.
32. Reed T.R., Wechsler H. Spatial/spatial-frequency representations for image segmentation and grouping. Image and Vision Computing. 9(3):1991;175-194.
33. Reichel F.D., Todd J.T. Perceived depth inversion of smoothly curved surfaces due to image orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 16(3):1990;653-664.
34. Riley B. Kudielka R. Bridget Riley: Dialogues on Art. 1995;Zwemmer, London.
35. Rosinki R.R., Levine N.P. Texture gradient effectiveness in the perception of surface slant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 22:1976;261-271.
36. Ross J., Speed H.D. Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 246:1991;61-69.
37. Sagi D. The psychophysics of texture segmentation. Papathomas T.V. Early vision and beyond. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge.
38. Sakai K., Finkel L.H. Characterization of the spatial-frequency spectrum in the perception of shape from texture. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 12(6):1993;1208-1224.
39. Shepard R. Mind sights. 1990;W.H. Freeman, New York.
40. Stevens K.A. The visual interpretation of surface contours. Artificial Intelligence. 17:1981;47-73.
41. Todd J.T., Akerstrom R.A. Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture. Journal Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance. 113(2):1987;221-224.
42. Turner M.R., Gerstein G.L., Bajcsy R. Underestimation of visual texture slant by human observers: a model. Biological Cybernetics. 65:1991;215-226.
43. Vickers D. Perceptual economy and the impression of visual depth. Perception and Psychophysics. 10(1):1971;23-27.
44. Voorhees H., Poggio T. Computing texture boundaries from images. Nature. 333:1988;364-367.
45. Witkin A.P. Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture. Artificial Intelligence. 17:1981;17-45.