Visual inferences of material changes: Color as clue and distraction

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 686-700

  Zaidi, Qasim ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955914362     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.148     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Land E. The retinex theory of colour vision. Proc R Inst Great Brit 1974, 47:23-58.
2. Hurlbert AC. Computational models of colour constancy. In: Walsh V, Kulikowski J, eds. Perceptual Constancy: Why Things Look As They Do. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998, 283-322.
3. Maloney LT. Physics-based approaches to modeling surface color perception. In: Gegenfurtner KR, Sharpe LT, eds. Color Vision: From Genes to Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999, 387-422.
4. Brainard DH. Color constancy. In: Chalupa L, Werner J, eds. The Visual Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004, 948-961.
5. Smithson H, Zaidi Q. Colour constancy in context: roles for local adaptation and levels of reference. J Vision 2004, 4:693-710.
6. Zaidi Q. The role of adaptation in color constancy. In: Clifford C, Rhodes G, eds. Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision, Vol 2, Advances in Visual Cognition Series. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005, 103-131.
7. Zaidi Q, Bostic M. Color strategies for object identification. Vision Res 2008, 48:2673-2681.
8. Olkkonen M, Hansen T, Gegenfurtner KR. Categorical color constancy for simulated surfaces. J Vision 2009, 9:1-18.
9. Zaidi Q. Identification of illuminant and object colors: heuristic-based algorithms. J Opt Soc Am 1998, 15:1767-1776.
10. Zaidi Q. Color constancy in a rough world. Color Res Appl 2001, 26:S192-S200.
11. Dorsey J, Pederson HK, Hanrahan P. Flow and changes in appearance. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 1996, 411-420.
12. Gu J, Tu C, Ramamoorthi R, Belhumeur P, Matusik W, Nayar S. Time-varying surface appearance: acquisition, modeling and rendering. ACM T Graph 2006, 762-771.
13. Sakoe H, Chiba S. Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 1978, 26:43-49.
14. Nicodemus F. Directional reflectance and emissivity of an opaque surface. Appl Opt 1965, 4:767-775.
15. Torrance K, Sparrow E, Birkebak R. Polarization, directional distribution, and off-specular peak phenomena in light reflected from roughened surfaces. J Opt Soc Am 1966, 56:916-925.
16. Blinn J. Models of light reflection for computer synthesized pictures. Comp Graph 1977, 11:192-198.
17. Cook R, Torrance K. A reflection model for computer graphics. ACM T Graph 1982, 1:7-24.
18. Ward G. Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection. Comp Graph 1992, 25:265-273.
19. Koenderink J, Van Doorn A, Stavridi M. Bidirectional reflection distribution function expressed in terms of surface scattering modes. Eur Conf Comp Vision 1996, 28-39.
20. Ngan A, Durand F, Matusik W. Experimental analysis of BRDF models. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2005, 117-126.
21. Sun B, Sunkavalli K, Ramamoorthi R, Belhumeur P, Nayar S. Time-varying BRDFs. Eurographics Workshop on Natural Phenomena, 2006, 15-24.
22. Yoonessi A, Zaidi Q. The role of color in recognizing material changes. Opthal Physiol Opt 2010, 30: 626-631.
23. Eugene C. Measurement of "total visual appearance": a CIE challenge of soft metrology. 12th IMEKO TC1 & TC7 Joint Symposium on Man, Science & Measurement, 2008, 61-65.
24. Hartung B, Kersten D. Distinguishing shiny from matte. J Vision 2002, 2:551a.
25. Dana KJ, Van Ginneken B, Nayar SK, Koenderink JJ. Reflectance and texture of real world surfaces. ACM T Graph 1999, 18:1-34.
26. Ho YH, Landy MS, Maloney LT. Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture. Psychol Sci 2008, 19:196-204.
27. Ho YX, Maloney LT, Landy MS. The effect of viewpoint on perceived visual roughness. J Vision 2007, 7:1-16.
28. Sharan L, Li Y, Motoyoshi I, Nishida S, Adelson EH. Image statistics for surface reflectance perception. J Opt Soc Am 2008, 25:846-865.
29. Liu C, Sharan L, Adelson E, Rosenholtz R. Exploring features in a Bayesian framework for material recognition. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010.
30. Hansen T, Olkkonen M, Walter S, Gegenfurtner KR. Memory modulates color appearance. Nat Neurosci 2006, 9:1367-1368.
31. Nishida S, Shinya M. Use of image-based information in judgments of surface reflectance properties. J Opt Soc Am A 1998, 15:2951-2965.
32. Matusik W, Pfister H, Brand M, McMillan L. A data-driven reflectance model. ACM T Graph 2003, 22: 759-769.
33. Vapnik VN. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.; 1995.
34. von Helmholtz H. Ueber die Erklärung der stereoskopischen Erscheinung des Glanzes. Sitzungsberichte Naturhistorischen Vereins Preussischen Rheinlande Westphalens 1856, 13:38-40.
35. Motoyoshi I, Nishida LS, Adelson EH. Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature 2007, 447:206-209.
36. Anderson BL, Kim J. Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. J Vision 2009, 9:1-17.
37. Wada Y, Arce-Lopera C, Masuda T, Kimura A, Dan I, Goto S, Tsuzuki D, Okajima K. Influence of luminance distribution on the appetizingly fresh appearance of cabbage. Appetite 2010, 54:363-368.
38. Pellacini F, Ferwerda J, Greenberg D. Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis. Comp Graph 2000, 34:55-64.
39. Robilotto R, Zaidi Q. Lightness identification of patterned three-dimensional real objects. J Vision 2006, 6:18-36.
40. Robilotto R, Zaidi Q. Limits of lightness identification for real objects under natural viewing conditions. J Vision 2004, 4:779-897.
41. Robilotto R, Khang B, Zaidi Q. Sensory and physical determinants of perceived achromatic transparency. J Vision 2002, 2:388-403.
42. Robilotto R, Zaidi Q. Perceived transparency of neutral density filters across dissimilar backgrounds. J Vision 2004, 4:183-195.
43. Fleming R, Bulthoff H. Low-Level Image Cues in the Perception of Translucent Materials. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2005, 2:346-382.
44. Lowe DG. Distinctive image-features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comp Vision 2004, 60: 91-110.
45. Dalal N, Triggs B. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. Proc CVPR IEEE 2006, 2:886-893.
46. Varma M, Zisserman A. A statistical approach to material classification using image patch exemplars. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 2009, 31:2032-2047.
47. Adelson EH. On seeing stuff: the perception of materials by humans and machines. Phil Soc Photo-Opt Inst 2001, 1-12.
48. Xiao B, Brainard DH. Surface gloss and color perception of 3D objects. Visual Neurosci 2008, 25:371-385.
49. Vangorp P, Laurijssen J, Dutre P. The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance. ACM T Graph 2001, 26:1-77.
50. Dror R, Adelson EH, Willsky AS. Recognition of surface reflectance properties from a single image under unknown real-world illumination. IEEE Workshop on Identifying Objects Across Variation in Lighting, 2001.
51. Gilroy LA, Blake R. Physics embedded in visual perception of three-dimensional shape from motion. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7:921-922.
52. Li A, Zaidi Q. Three-dimensional shape from non-homogeneous textures: carved and stretched surfaces. J Vision 2004, 4: 860-878.
53. D'Zmura M, Colantoni P, Knoblauch K, Laget B. Color transparency. Perception 1997, 26:471-492.
54. Wichmann FA, Drewes J, Rosas P, Gegenfurtner KR. Animal detection in natural scenes: critical features revisited. J Vision 2010, 10:6.1-6.27.
55. Zaidi Q, Griffiths AF. Generic assumptions shared by visual perception and imagery. Brain Behav Sci 2002, 25:215-216.