Detection of visual-tactile contingency in the first year after birth

Cognition

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 82-89

  Zmyj, Norbert ^a   Jank, Jana ^b   Schütz Bosbach, Simone ^c   Daum, Moritz M ^c  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contingency; Development; Infant; Rubber hand illusion; Self perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BABY; BIRTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; LEG; MALE; ONTOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TOUCH; VIDEORECORDING; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AGE FACTORS; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; SELF CONCEPT; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79955920664     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anisfeld M. Only tongue protrusion modeling is matched by neonates. Developmental Review 1996, 16:149-161.
2. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological 2003, 270:1499-1506.
3. Bahrick L.E., Lickliter R. Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology 2000, 36:190-201.
4. Bahrick L.E., Watson J.S. Detection of intermodal proprioceptive-visual contingency as a potential basis of self-perception in infancy. Developmental Psychology 1985, 21:963-973.
5. Bermudez J.L., Marcel A.M., Eilan N. The body and the self 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D., Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself?. NeuroReport 2000, 11:R11-R16.
7. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
8. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:229-240.
9. Daum, M. M., & Prinz, W. (in press). Body and action representations for integrating self and other. In V. Slaughter & C. Brownell (Eds.), Early development of body representations (Cambridge studies in cognitive and perceptual development). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305:875-877.
11. Jones S.S. Imitation or exploration? Young infants' matching of adults' oral gestures. Child Development 1996, 67:1952-1969.
12. Gergely G., Watson J.S. Early social-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. Early socialization 1999, 101-137. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, NJ. P. Rochat (Ed.).
13. Geangu E. Notes on self awareness development in early infancy. Cognition, Brain, Behaviour 2008, 12:103-113.
14. Giummarra M.J., Gibson S.J., Georgiou-Karistianis N., Bradshaw J.L. Mechanisms underlying embodiment, disembodiment and loss of embodiment. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews 2008, 32:143-160.
15. Graziano M.S., Cooke D.F., Taylor C.S. Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 2000, 290:1782-1786.
16. Graziano M.S., Botvinick M.M. How the brain represents the body: Insights from neurophysiology and psychology. Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX 2001, 136-157. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. W. Prinz, B. Hommel (Eds.).
17. Haans A., Ijsselsteijn W.A., De Kort Y.A.W. The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceives ownership of a fake limb. Body Image 2008, 5:389-394.
18. Hiraki K. Detecting contingency. A key to understanding development of self and social cognition. Japanese Psychological Research 2006, 48:204-212.
19. Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. NeuroReport 1996, 7:2325-2330.
20. Kammers M., de Vignemont F., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C. The rubber hand in action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:204-211.
21. Lenggenhager B., Tadi T., Metzinger T., Blanke O. Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 2007, 317:1096-1099.
22. Meltzoff A.N., Moore M.K. Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting 1997, 6:179-192.
23. Morgan R., Rochat P. Intermodal calibration of the body in early infancy. Ecological Psychology 1997, 9:1-23.
24. Neisser U. Two perceptually given aspects of the self and their development. Developmental Review 1991, 11:197-209.
25. Rochat P., Morgan R. Spatial determinants in the perception of self-produced leg movements by 3- to 5-month old infants. Development Psychology 1995, 31:626-636.
26. Rochat P., Morgan R. Two functional orientations of self-exploration in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1998, 16:139-154.
27. Rochat P., Striano T. Perceived self in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development 2000, 23:513-530.
28. Rochat P. Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal 2003, 12:717-731.
29. Sann C., Streri A. The limits of newborn's grasping to detect texture in a cross-modal transfer task. Infant Behaviour and Development 2008, 31:523-531.
30. Schmuckler M.A. Visual-proprioceptive intermodal perception in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development 1996, 19:221-232.
31. Schmuckler M.A., Fairhall J.L. Visual-proprioceptive intermodal perception using point light displays. Child Development 2001, 72:949-962.
32. Schmuckler M.A., Jewell D.T. Infants' visual-proprioceptive intermodal perception with imperfect contingency information. Developmental Psychobiology 2007, 48:387-398.
33. Schütz-Bosbach S., Mancini B., Aglioti S.M., Haggard P. Self and other in the human motor system. Current Biology 2006, 16:1830-1834.
34. Schütz-Bosbach S., Tausche P., Weiss C. Roughness perception during the Rubber-Hand-Illusion. Brain and Cognition 2009, 70:136-144.
35. Slaughter V., Heron M. Origins and early development of human body knowledge. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 2004, 69. [Serial No. 276].
36. Streri A., Gentaz E. Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes and handedness in human newborns. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1365-1369.
37. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
38. Tsakiris M., Haggard P., Franck N., Mainy N., Siriguru A. A specific role of efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition 2005, 96:215-231.
39. Van den Bos E., Jeannerod M. Sense of body and sense of action both contribute to self-recognition. Cognition 2002, 85:177-187.
40. Vallar G., Ronchi R. Somatoparaphrenia: A body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192:533-551.
41. von Holst E., Mittelstaedt H. Das Reafferenzprinzip. Wechselwirkung zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie [The reafference principle. Interaction between the central nervous system and the periphery]. Die Naturwissenschaften 1950, 37:464-476.
42. Watson J.S. Smiling, cooing, and 'The Game'. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 1972, 18:323-339.
43. Watson J.S. Detection of self: The perfect algorithm. Self-awareness in animals and humans: Developmental perspectives 1994, 131-148. Cambridge University Press, New York. S.T. Parker, R.W. Mitchell, M.L. Boccia (Eds.).
44. Zieber N., Bhatt R.S., Hayden A., Kangas A., Collins R., Bada H. Body representation in the first year of life. Infancy 2010, 15:534-544.
45. Zmyj N., Hauf P., Striano T. Discrimination between real-time and delayed visual feedback of self-performed leg movements in the first year of life. Cognition, Brain, Behavior 2009, 13:479-489.