Infants' visual-proprioceptive intermodal perception with imperfect contingency information

Developmental Psychobiology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 387-398

  Schmuckler, Mark A ^a   Jewell, Derryn T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Infant development; Intermodal perception; Visual proprioceptive recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PROPRIOCEPTION; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34248579026     PISSN: 00121630     EISSN: 10982302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dev.20214     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Bahrick, L. E. (1988). Intermodal learning in infancy: Learning on the basis of two kinds of invariant relations in audible and visible events. Child Development, 53, 197-209.
2. Bahrick, L. E. (1994). The development of sensitivity to arbitrary intermodal relations. Ecological Psychology, 6, 111-123.
3. Bahrick, L. E. (1995). Intermodal origins of self-perception. In P. Rochat (Ed.), The self in infancy: Theory and research (pp. 349-374). Amsterdam: North Holland.
4. Bahrick, L. E. (2001). Increasing specificity in perceptual development: Infants' detection of nested levels of multi-modal stimulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 253-270.
5. Bahrick, L. E. (2002). Generalization of learning in three-and-a-half- month-old infants on the basis of amodal relations. Child Development, 73, 667-685.
6. Bahrick, L. E., Flom, R., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 41, 352-363.
7. Bahrick, L. E., Hernandez-Reif, M., & Flom, R. (2005). The development of infant learning about specific face-voice relations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 541-552.
8. Bahrick, L. E., Moss, L., & Fadil, C. (1996). Development of visual self-recognition in infancy. Ecological Psychology, 8, 189-208.
9. Bahrick, L. E., & Pickens, J. N. (1994). Amodal relations: The basis for intermodal perception and learning in infancy. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 205-233). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Bahrick, L. E., & Watson, J. S. (1985). Detection of intermodal proprioceptive-visual contingency as a potential basis of self-perception in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 21, 963-973.
11. Bertenthal, B. I., & Bai, D. L. (1989). Infant's sensitivity to optical flow for controlling posture. Developmental Psychology, 25, 936-945.
12. Bertenthal, B. I., Rose, J. L., & Bai, D. L. (1997). Perception-action coupling in the development of visual control of posture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1631-1643.
13. Bhatt, R. S., Wilk, A., Hill, D., & Rovee-Collier, C. (2004). Correlated attributes and categorization in the first half-year of life. Developmental Psychobiology, 44, 103-115.
14. Bigelow, A. E. (1998). Infants' sensitivity to familiar imperfect contingencies in social interaction. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 149-162.
15. Bigelow, A. E. (2001). Discovering self through other: Infants' preference of social contingency. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 65, 335-346.
16. Bigelow, A. E., & Birch, S. A. J. (1999). The effect of contingency in previous interactions on infants' preference for social contingency. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 367-382.
17. Bigelow, A. E., & DeCoste, C. (2003). Sensitivity to social contingency from mothers and strangers in 2-, 4-, and 6-month-old infants. Infancy, 4, 111-140.
18. Bushnell, E. W., & Boudreau, J. P. (1991). The development of haptic perception during infancy. In M. A. Heller & W. Schiff (Eds.), The psychology of touch (pp. 139-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Bushnell, E. W., & Boudreau, J. P. (1993). Motor development and the mind: The potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. Child Development, 64, 1005-1021.
20. Catanzaro, A. M., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2002). Response perseveration in barrier crossing. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Toronto, ON.
21. de Haan, M., Humphreys, K., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Developing a brain specialized for face perception: A converging methods approach. Developmental Psychobiology, 40, 200-212.
22. Field, T. M. (1987). Affective and interactive disturbances in infants. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed., pp. 972-1005). New York: Wiley.
23. Flom, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2001). Is featural information necessary for 5-month-olds' perception of motion specifying the self? Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
24. Gibson, E. J., & Walker, A. S. (1984). Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordances of substance. Child Development, 55, 453-460.
25. Gogate, L. J., & Bahrick, L. E. (1998). Intersensory redundancy facilitates learning of arbitrary relations between vowel-sounds and objects in 7-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 133-149.
26. Gottfried, A. W., Rose, S. A., & Bridger, W. H. (1977). Cross-modal transfer in human infants. Child Development, 48, 118-123.
27. Hartshorn, K., & Rovee-Collier, C. (2003). Does infant memory expression reflect age at encoding or age at retrieval. Developmental Psychobiology, 42, 283-291.
28. Hernandez-Reif, M., & Bahrick, L. E. (2001). The development of visual-tactual perception of objects: Amodal relations provide the basis for learning arbitrary relations. Infancy, 2, 51-72.
29. Hildreth, K., Sweeney, B., & Rovee-Collier, C. (2003). Differential memory-preserving effects of reminders at 6 months. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 41-62.
30. Jewell, D. T., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2000). Active versus passive movement in infant search. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Infant Studies, Brighton, England.
31. Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1-19.
32. Kaye, K. L., & Bower, T. G. R. (1994). Learning and intermodal transfer in newborns. Psychological Science, 5, 286-288.
33. Kingsnorth, S., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2000). Walking skill versus walking experience as a predictor of barrier crossing in toddlers. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 331-350.
34. Legerstee, M., Anderson, D., & Schaffer, A. (1998). Five- and eight-month-old infants recognize their faces and voices as familiar and social stimuli. Child Development, 69, 37-50.
35. Lewkowicz, D. J. (2000). The development of intersensory temporal perception: An epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 281-308.
36. Lewkowicz, D. J. (2001). The concept of ecological validity: What are its limitations and is it bad to be invalid. Infancy, 2, 437-450.
37. Lewkowicz, D. J. & Lickliter R. (Eds.), (1994). The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2000). The development of infant intersensory perception: Advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 260-280.
39. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2001). The salience of multimodal sensory stimulation in early development: Implications for the issue of ecological validity. Infancy, 2, 451-467.
40. Maurer, D., Stager, C. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (1999). Cross-modal transfer of shape is difficult to demonstrate in one-month-olds. Child Development, 70, 1047-1057.
41. Meltzoff, A. N., & Borton, R. W. (1979). Intermodal matching by human neonates. Nature, 282, 403-404.
42. Morgan, R., & Rochat, P. (1997). Intermodal calibration of the body in early infancy. Ecological Psychology, 9, 1-23.
43. Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). Conspec and conlern: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164-181.
44. Muir, D., & Field, J. (1979). Newborn infants orient to sounds. Child Development, 50, 431-436.
45. Papousek, H., & Papousek, M. (1974). Mirror-image and self recognition in young human infants: I. A new method of experimental analysis. Developmental Psychobiology, 7, 149-157.
46. Rochat, P. (1998). Self-perception and action in infancy. Experimental Brain Research, 123, 102-109.
47. Rochat, P. (2001a). The infant's world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
48. Rochat, P. (2001b). Origins of self-concept. In J. G. Bremner & A. Fogel (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of infant development (pp. 191-212). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
49. Rochat, P. (2001c). Social contingency detection and infant development. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 65, 347-361.
50. Rochat, P., & Hespos, S. J. (1997). Differential rooting response by neonates: Evidence for an early sense of self. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 151-158.
51. Rochat, P., & Morgan, R. (1995). Spatial determinants in the perception of self-produced leg movements in 3- to 5-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 31, 626-636.
52. Rochat, P., & Morgan, R. (1998). Two functional orientations of self-exploration in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 139-154.
53. Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (1999). Emerging self-exploration by 2-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 2, 206-218.
54. Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (2002). Who's in the mirror? Self-other discrimination in specular images by four- and nine-month-old infants. Child Development, 73, 35-46.
55. Rose, S. A. (1990). Cross-modal transfer in human infants: What is being transferred? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 38-50.
56. Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., Futterweit, L. R., & Jankowski, J. J. (1998). Continuity in tactual-visual cross-modal transfer: Infancy to 11 years. Developmental Psychology, 34, 435-440.
57. Rose, S. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Bridger, W. H. (1981a). Cross-modal transfer and information processing by sense of touch in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 17, 90-98.
58. Rose, S. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Bridger, W. H. (1981b). Cross-modal transfer in 6-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 17, 661-669.
59. Rose, S. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Bridger, W. H. (1983). Infants' cross-modal transfer from solid objects to their graphic representations. Child Development, 54, 686-694.
60. Rose, S. A., & Ruff, H. A. (1987). Cross-modal abilities in human infants. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
61. Rovee-Collier, C. K., & Barr, R. (2001). Infant learning and memory. In J. G. Bremner & A. Pogel (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of infant development (pp. 139-168). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
62. Rovee-Collier, C. K., & Gekoski, M. J. (1979). The economics of infancy: A review of conjugate reinforcement. In H. W. Reese & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 13, pp. 195-255). New York: Academic Press.
63. Rovee, C. K., & Rovee, D. T. (1969). Conjugate reinforcement of infant exploratory behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 33-39.
64. Sai, F. Z. (2005). The role of mother's voice in developing mother's face preference: Evidence for intermodal perception at birth. Infant and Child Development, 14, 29-50.
65. Schmuckler, M. A. (1995). Self-knowledge of body position: Integration of perceptual and action system information. In P. Rochat (Ed.), The self in infancy: Theory and research (pp. 221-241). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
66. Schmuckler, M. A. (1996a). The development of visually-guided locomotion: Barrier crossing in toddlers. Ecological Psychology, 8, 209-236.
67. Schmuckler, M. A. (1996b). Visual-proprioceptive intermodal perception in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 19, 221-232.
68. Schmuckler, M. A., & Fairhall, J. L. (2001). Visual-proprioceptive intermodal perception using point light displays. Child Development, 72, 949-962.
69. Schmuckler, M. A., & Gibson, E. J. (1989). The effect of imposed optical flow on guided locomotion in young walkers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 193-206.
70. Schmuckler, M. A., & Tsang-Tong, H. Y. (2000). The role of visual and body movement information in infant search. Developmental Psychology, 36, 499-510.
71. Spelke, E. S. (1987). The development of intermodal perception. In P. Salapatek & L. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of infant perception, Vol. 2: From perception to cognition (pp. 233-273). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
72. Stoffregen, T. A., Schmuckler, M. A., & Gibson, E. J. (1987). Use of central and peripheral optical flow in stance and locomotion in young walkers. Perception, 16, 113-119.
73. Watson, J. S. (1972). Smiling, cooing, and "the game". Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 323-339.
74. Watson, J. S. (1979). Perception of contingency as a determinant of social responsiveness. In E. Thoman (Ed.), Origins of the infant's social responsiveness (pp. 33-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Watson, J. S. (1985). Contingency perception in early social development. In T. M. Field & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 157-176). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
76. Watson, J. S. (1994). Detection of the self: The perfect algorithm. In S. T. Parker, R. W. Mitchell, & M. L. Boccia (Eds.), Self-awareness in animals and humans (pp. 131-148). New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Watson, J. S. (1997). Contingency and its two indices within conditional probability analysis. Behavior Analyst, 20, 129-140.
78. Watson, J. S. (2001). Contingency perception and misperception in infancy: Some potential implications for attachment. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 65, 296-320.
79. Wilk, A., Klein, L., & Rovee-Collier, C. K. (2001). Visual-preference and operant measures of infant memory. Developmental Psychobiology, 39, 301-312.