Self and Other in the Human Motor System

Current Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 18, 2006, Pages 1830-1834

  Schütz Bosbach, Simone ^a,b   Mancini, Benedetta ^c   Aglioti, Salvatore M ^c   Haggard, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

SYSNEURO

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; HAND; HUMAN; ILLUSION; IMITATION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION; STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION;

COGNITION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; MOVEMENT; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748469018     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.048     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Pavesi G., and Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. J. Neurophysiol. 73 (1995) 2608-2611
2. Romani M., Cesari P., Urgesi C., Facchini S., and Aglioti S.M. Motor facilitation of the human cortico-spinal system during observation of bio-mechanically impossible movements. Neuroimage 26 (2005) 755-763
3. Strafella A.P., and Paus T. Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport 11 (2000) 2289-2292
4. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., and Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 (2001) 661-670
5. Wilson M., and Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychol. Bull. 131 (2005) 460-473
6. Jeannerod M., and Pacherie E. Agency, simulation and self-identification. Mind and Language 19 (2004) 113-146
7. Decety J., and Chaminade T. When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification. Conscious Cogn. 12 (2003) 577-596
8. Astafiev S., Stanley C.M., Shulman G.L., and Corbetta M. Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2004) 542-548
9. Jeannerod M. Visual and action cues contribute to the self-other distinction. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2004) 422-423
10. Tsakiris M., Haggard P., Franck N., Mainy N., and Sirigu A. A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition 96 (2005) 215-231
11. Botvinick M., and Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391 (1998) 756
12. Tsakiris M., and Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31 (2005) 80-91
13. Armel K.C., and Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270 (2003) 1499-1506
14. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., and Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305 (2004) 875-877
15. Schaefer M., Flor H., Heinze H.-J., and Rotte M. Dynamic modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex during seeing and feeling a touched hand. Neuroimage 29 (2006) 587-592
16. Castiello U., Lusher D., Mari M., Edwards M., and Humphreys G. Observing a human or a robotic hand grasping an object: Differential motor priming effects. In: Prinz W., and Hommel B. (Eds). Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford
17. Kilner J.M., Paulignan Y., and Blakemore S.J. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr. Biol. 13 (2003) 522-525
18. Perani D., Fazio F., Borghese N.A., Tettamanti M., Ferrari S., Decety J., and Gilardi M.C. Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage 14 (2001) 749-758
19. Tai Y.F., Scherfler C., Brooks D.J., Sawamoto N., and Castiello U. The human premotor cortex is "mirror" only for biological actions. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 117-120
20. Heyes C. Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5 (2001) 253-261
21. Flament D., Goldsmith P., Buckley C.J., and Lemon R.N. Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. J. Physiol. 464 (1993) 361-378
22. Gangitano M., Mottaghy F.M., and Pascual-Leone A. Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation. Neuroreport 12 (2001) 1489-1492
23. Lemon R.N. Functional properties of monkey motor cortex neurones receiving afferent input from the hand and fingers. J. Physiol. 311 (1981) 497-519
24. Patuzzo S., Fiaschi A., and Manganotti P. Modulation of motor cortex excitability in the left hemisphere during action observation: A single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study of self- and non-self-action observation. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 1272-1278
25. Daprati E., Franck N., Georgieff N., Proust J., Pacherie E., Dalery J., and Jeannerod M. Looking for the agent: An investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition 65 (1997) 71-86
26. Maeda F., Kleiner-Fisman G., and Pascual-Leone A. Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: Specificity of the effect and role of observer's orientation. J. Neurophysiol. 87 (2002) 1329-1335
27. Saxe R., Jamal N., and Powell L. My body or yours? The effect of visual perspective on cortical body representations. Cereb. Cortex 43 (2006) 1391-1399
28. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Halligan P.W., Frith C.D., Driver J., Frackowiak R.S., and Dolan R.J. The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain 122 (1999) 497-512
29. Leube D.T., Knoblich G., Erb M., and Kircher T.T. Observing one's hand become anarchic: An fMRI study of action identification. Conscious. Cogn. 12 (2003) 597-608
30. Brass M., Zysset S., and von Cramon D.Y. The inhibition of imitative response tendencies. Neuroimage 14 (2001) 1416-1423