Body representation in the first year of life

Infancy

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 534-544

  Zieber, Nicole ^a   Bhatt, Ramesh S ^a   Hayden, Angela ^a   Kangas, Ashley ^a   Collins, Rebecca ^a   Bada, Henrietta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BODY REPRESENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; INFANT; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; STANDING;

EID: 79955781282     PISSN: 15250008     EISSN: 15327078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00026.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bertenthal, B. I., Proffitt, D. R., & Cutting, J. E. (1984). Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 213-230.
2. Bhatt, R. S., Bertin, E., Hayden, A., & Reed, A. (2005). Face processing in infancy: Developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information. Child Development, 76, 169-181.
3. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1994). Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children? Visual Cognition, 1, 253-274.
4. de Haan, M., Pascalis, O., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 199-209.
5. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1-22.
6. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
7. Fox, R., & McDaniel, C. (1982). The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science, 218, 486-487.
8. Gauthier, A., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a ''Greeble'' expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
9. Gliga, T., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2005). Structural encoding of body and face in human infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1328-1340.
10. Hayden, A., Bhatt, R. S., Reed, A., Corbly, C. R., & Joseph, J. E. (2007). The development of expert face processing: Are infants sensitive to normal differences in second-order relational information? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 85-98.
11. Hayden, A., Bhatt, R. S., Zieber, N., & Kangas, A. (2009). Race-based perceptual asymmetries underlying face processing in infancy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 270-275.
12. Heron, M., & Slaughter, V. (2008). Toddlers' categorization of typical and scrambled dolls and cars. Infant Behavior and Development, 31, 374-385.
13. Heron, M., & Slaughter, V. (in press). Infants' responses to real humans and representations of humans. International Journal of Behavioral Development.
14. Hirai, M., & Hiraki, K. (2005). An event-related potential study of biological motion perception in human infants. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 301-304.
15. Johnson, K. L., & Tassinary, L. G. (2005). Perceiving sex directly and indirectly: Meaning in motion and morphology. Psychological Science, 16, 890-897.
16. Johnson, K. L., & Tassinary, L. G. (2007). Compatibility of basic social perceptions determines perceived attractiveness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 104, 5246-5251.
17. Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1-19.
18. Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., Pascalis, O. (2005). Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental Science, 8, F31-F36.
19. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 513-536.
20. Maurer, D., LeGrand, R., & Mondloch, C. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
21. Mondloch, C., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31, 553-566.
22. Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164-181.
23. Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296, 1321-1323.
24. Quinn, P. C., Lee, K., Pascalis, O., & Slater, A. M. (2007). In support of an expert-novice difference in the representation of humans versus non-human animals by infants: Generalization from persons to cats occurs only with upright whole images. Cognition, Brain, & Behavior, 11, 679-694.
25. Quinn, P. C., Yahr, J., Kuhn, A., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O. (2002). Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: A preference for female. Perception, 31, 1109-1121.
26. Ramsey-Rennels, J. L., & Langlois, J. H. (2007). How infants perceive and process faces. In A. Slater & M. Lewis (Eds.), Introduction to infant development (pp. 191-215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14, 302-308.
28. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., & McGoldrick, J. E. (2006). Not just posturing: Configural processing of the human body. In G. Knoblich, I. Thornton, M. Grosjean, & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 229-258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Reid, V. M., Hoehl, S., & Striano, T. (2005). The perception of biological motion by infants: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 395, 211-214.
30. Simion, F., Leo, I., Turati, C., Valenza, E., & Dalla Barba, B. (2007). How face specialization emerges in the first months of life. In C. Von Hofsten & K. Rosander (Eds.), Progress in brain research series: From action to cognition (Vol. 164, pp. 169-186).
31. Slaughter, V., & Heron, M. (2004). Origins and early development of human body knowledge. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69, 1-102.
32. Slaughter, V., Heron, M., & Sim, S. (2002). Development of preferences for the human body shape in infancy. Cognition, 85, B71-B81.
33. Slaughter, V., Stone, V. E., & Reed, C. L. (2004). Perception of faces and bodies: Similar or different? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 219-223.
34. Tassinary, L. G., & Hansen, K. A. (1998). A critical test of the waist-to-hip-ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychological Science, 9, 150-155.
35. Thompson, L. A., Madrid, V., Westbrook, S., & Johnston, V. (2001). Infants attend to secondorder relational properties of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 769-777.
36. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.