The influence of recombination on SNP diversity in chickens

Hereditas

Volumn 148, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 63-69

  Rao, Yousheng ^a,b   Sun, Liang ^b   Nie, Qinghua ^b   Zhang, Xiquan ^b  

^a Jiangxi Institute of Education   (China)

^b SOUTH CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BACKGROUND SELECTION; CHICKEN; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION RATE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; INTRON; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SELECTIVE SWEEP; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; FEMALE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC LOCI; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TURKEYS;

GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 79955852743     PISSN: 00180661     EISSN: 16015223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2010.02210.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aguade M., Miyashita N. and Langley C. H. 1989. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 122: 607-615.
2. Axelsson E., Webster M. T., Smith N. G. C. et al. 2005. Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes. Genome Res. 15: 120-125.
3. Begun D. J. and Aquadro C. F. 1991. Molecular population genetics of the distal portion of the X chromosome in Drosophila: evidence for genetic hitchhiking of the yellow-achaete region. Genetics 129: 1147-1158.
4. Begun D. J. and Aquadro C. F. 1992. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature 356: 519-520.
5. Begun D. J., Holloway A. K., Stevens K. et al. 2007. Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS. Biol. 5: e310.
6. Berry A. J., Ajioka J. W. and Kreitman M. 1991. Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics 129: 1111-1117.
7. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T. and Charlesworth D. 1993. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134: 1289-1303.
8. Clark R. M., Tavaré S. and Doebley J. 2005. Estimating a nucleotide substitution rate for maiz from polymorphism at a major domestication locus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22: 2304-2312.
9. Cutter A. D. and Choi J. Y. 2010. Natural selection shapes nucleotide polymorphism across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae. Genome Res. 20: 1103-1111.
10. Fang L., Jia Y. and Li N. 2008. Positive correlation between recombination rate and nucleotide diversity is shown under domestication selection in the chicken genome. Chin. Sci. Bull. 53: 746-750.
11. Fu Y. X. and Li W. H. 1993. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133: 693-709.
12. Groenen M. A. M., Wahlberg P., Foglio M. et al. 2009. A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res. 19: 510-519.
13. Hellmann I., Ebersberger I., Ptak S. E. et al. 2003. A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72: 1527-1535.
14. Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure. Scand J. Stat. 6: 65-70.
15. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (ICGSC) 2004. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432: 695-716.
16. International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium (ICPMC) 2004. A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 432: 717-725.
17. Jensen M. A., Charlesworth B. and Kreitman M. 2002. Patterns of genetic variation at a chromosome 4 locus of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics 160: 493-507.
18. Kraft T., Säll T., Magnusson-Rading I. et al. 1998. Positive correlation between recombination rates and levels of genetic variation in natural populations of sea beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima). Genetics 150: 1239-1244.
19. Kulathinal R. J., Bennett S. M. and Fitzpatrick C. L. 2008. Fine-scale mapping of recombination rate in Drosophila refines its correlation to diversity and divergence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 10051-10056.
20. Nachman M. 2001. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and recombination rate in humans. Trends Genet. 17: 481-485.
21. Nie Q., Lei M., Ouyang J. et al. 2005. Identification and characterization of single nucleotide polymorphisms in 12 chicken growth-correlated genes by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography. Genet. Selection Evol. 37: 339-360.
22. Roselius K., Stephan W. and Städler T. 2005. The relationship of nucleotide polymorphism, recombination rate and selection in wild tomato species. Genetics 171: 753-763.
23. Rozas J., Sanchez-DelBarrio J. C., Messeguer X. et al. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496-2497.
24. Salcedo T., Geraldes A. and Nachman M. W. 2007. Nucleotide variation in wild and inbred mice. Genetics 177: 2277-2791.
25. Smith J. M. and Haigh J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.
26. Spencer C. C., Deloukas P., Hunt S. et al. 2006. The influence of recombination on human genetic diversity. PLoS Genet. 2: e148.
27. Sundström H., Webster M. T. and Ellegren H. 2004. Reduced variation on the chicken Z chromosome. Genetics 167: 377-385.
28. Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
29. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F. et al. 1997. The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 4876-4882.
30. Webster T., Axelsson E. and Ellegren H. 2006. Strong regional biases in nucleotide substitution in the chicken genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 1203-1216.
31. Zhou M., Lei M., Rao Y. et al. 2008. Polymorphisms of vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor-1 gene and their genetic effects on broodiness in chickens. Poult. Sci. 87: 893-903.
32. Zhou M., Du Y., Nie Q. et al. 2010. Associations between polymorphisms in the chicken VIP gene, egg production and broody traits. Br. Poult. Sci. 51: 195-203.