Does more (or even better) information lead to better budgeting? A new perspective

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 945-960

  Joyce, Philip G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56749134211     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: 15206688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20389     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Beam, D. (1996). If public ideas are so important now, why are policy analysts so depressed? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15, 430-437.
2. Congressional Budget Office. (2004). Cost estimate of H.R. 1588, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004, retrieved from http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/48xx/doc4864/hr1588.pdf.
3. Congressional Budget Office. (2006a). A review of CBO's activities under the unfunded mandates reform act, 1996-2005.
4. Congressional Budget Office. (2006b). Historical effective federal tax rates, 1979-2004.
5. Congressional Budget Office. (2007). The budget and economic outlook: An update.
6. Cuny, T. J. (1991). Federal credit reform. Public Budgeting & Finance, 11, 19-32.
7. Feldman, R. (1993). Controlling losses of the pension benefit guarantee corporation. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
8. Fisher, L. (1990). Federal budget doldrums: The vacuum in presidential leadership. Public Administration Review, 50, 693-700.
9. General Accounting Office (1993). Statement of Charles Bowsher. Government management: report on 17 high-risk areas.
10. Gilmour, J. (2006). Implementing OMB's program assessment rating tool (PART): Meeting the challenges of integrating budget and performance. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
11. Government Accountability Office. (2007a). High risk series: An update.
12. Government Accountability Office. (2007b). Fiscal wake-up tour. Available at http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/longterm/wakeuptour.html.
13. Government Performance and Results Act. (1993). PL. 103-62.
14. International Monetary Fund. (2007). Manual on fiscal transparency. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Available at http://www.imf.org/ external/np/pp/2007/eng/051507m.pdf.
15. Johnson, H., & Broder, D. (1996). The system: The American system of politics at the breaking point. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
16. Joyce, P. G. (1993). Using performance measures for federal budgeting: Proposals and prospects. Public Budgeting & Finance, 13, 3-17.
17. Joyce, P. G. (1996). Congressional budget reform: The unanticipated implications for federal policy making. Public Administration Review, 56, 317-325.
18. Joyce, P. G. (2003). Linking performance and budgeting: Opportunities in the federal budget process. Washington, DC: IBM Center on the Business of Government.
19. Kiely, K. (2007) Critical review starts series of GAO reports on Iraq. USA Today, 7A.
20. Lee, R. D., Jr., Johnson, R. W., & Joyce, P. G. (2008). Public budgeting systems, 8th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
21. Lurie, N. H. (2004). Decision making in information-rich environments: The role of information structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 473-87.
22. Meyers, R. (1997). Late appropriations and government shutdowns: Frequencies, causes, consequences, and remedies. Public Budgeting & Finance, 17, 25-38.
23. Mosher, F. (1984). A tale of two agencies. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
24. Mundy, A. (2005). Material withheld from Boeing tanker report angers Senate panel. Seattle Times. Accessed at http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/ boeingaerospace/2002320932/tanker-08.html.
25. National Performance Review. (1993). Mission-driven, results oriented budgeting. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. NPR/Kaiser Family Foundation/Kennedy School of Government. (2000). Americans distrust government, but want it to do more. Accessed at http://www.npr.org/programs/specials/polls/govt/gov.toplines.pdf.
27. Office of Management and Budget. (2007). Federal financial management report. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.
28. Phaup, M. (1991). Deposit insurance: A framework for reform. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
29. Pradhan, S., & Campos, E. (1996). Budgetary institutions and expenditure outcomes: Binding governments to fiscal performance. Washington, DC: World Bank.
30. Rubin, I. (2007). The great unraveling: Federal budgeting, 1998-2006. Public Administration Review, 67, 608.
31. Schick, A. (1973). A death in the bureaucracy: The decline of federal PPB. Public Administration Review, 33, 146-156.
32. Schick, A. (1980). Congress and money. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
33. Speier, C., Valacich, J. S., & Vessey, I. (1999) The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: An information overload perspective. Decision Sciences, 30, 337-360.
34. Stein, H. (1989). Governing the $5 trillion economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. United States Senate, Committee on Government Affairs. (1990). OMB's response to government management failures.
36. Wildavsky, A. (1987). Rescuing policy analysis from PPBS. In J. Shafritz & A. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration, 2nd ed. Chicago: Dorsey Press.