No strength or gait benefit of two-incision THA: A brief followup at 1 year

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 469, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1110-1118

  Krych, Aaron J ^a   Pagnano, Mark W ^a   Coleman Wood, Krista ^a   Meneghini, R Michael ^b   Kaufman, Kenton ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COXITIS; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; FEMALE; FLEXOR REFLEX; FOLLOW UP; GAIT; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ROTATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKING SPEED; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TIME; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TIME FACTORS; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 79955810941     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1660-6     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2432-2438. (Pubitemid 41546373)
2. Bennett D, Ogonda L, Elliott D, Humphreys L, Beverland DE. Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery: a prospective blinded study. Gait Posture. 2006;23:374-382.
3. Bennett D, Ogonda L, Elliott D, Humphreys L, Lawlor M, Beverland D. Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:490-495. (Pubitemid 46880170)
4. Berger RA. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:232-241. (Pubitemid 37499530)
5. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:163-172. (Pubitemid 38438343)
6. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, Della Valle C, Paprosky W, Rosenberg AG. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:239-247. (Pubitemid 39579219)
7. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, Dorr LD, Duwelius PJ, Hartzband MA, Lieberman JR, Mears DC. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2235-2246. (Pubitemid 37385929)
8. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, Kahn B, Cahill J, Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:139-144. (Pubitemid 40342699)
9. Desser DR, Mitrick MF, Ulrich SD, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Total hip arthroplasty: comparison of two-incision and standard techniques at an AOA-accredited community hospital. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010;110:12-15.
10. DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:123-128. (Pubitemid 36278513)
11. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1153-1160. (Pubitemid 46897984)
12. Duwelius PJ, Dorr LD. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: an overview of the results. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:215-222.
13. Huo MH, Brown BS. What's new in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1852-1864. (Pubitemid 37129633)
14. Isobe Y, Okuno M, Otsuki T, Yamamoto K. Clinical study on arthroplasties for osteoarthritic hip by quantitative gait analysis: comparison between total hip arthroplasty and bipolar endoprosthetic arthroplasty. Biomed Mater Eng. 1998;8:167-175.
15. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Ochoa JA, Haas BD, Hammill C. In vivo comparison of hip separation after metal-on-metal or metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1836-1841.
16. Krych AJ, Pagnano MW, Wood KC, Meneghini RM, Kaufmann K. No benefit of the two-incision THA over mini-posterior THA: a pilot study of strength and gait. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:565-570.
17. Kyriazis V, Rigas C. Temporal gait analysis of hip osteoarthritic patients operated with cementless hip replacement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17:318-321. (Pubitemid 34556764)
18. Lugade V, Klausmeier V, Jewett B, Collis D, Chou LS. Short-term recovery of balance control after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:3051-3058.
19. Madsen MS, Ritter MA, Morris HH, Meding JB, Berend ME, Faris PM, Vardaxis VG. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:44-50. (Pubitemid 38035444)
20. Malik A, Dorr L. The science of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;463:74-84. (Pubitemid 47585255)
21. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich PJ, Trousdale RT. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:63-67. (Pubitemid 44384204)
22. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WJ. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:293-298.
23. Meneghini RM, Smits SA, Swinford RR, Bahamonde RE. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6 suppl 1):68-73.
24. Müller M, Tohtz S, Winkler T, Dewey M, Springer I, Perka C. MRI findings of gluteus minimus muscle damage in primary total hip arthroplasty and the influence on clinical outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:927-935.
25. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O'Brien S, Beverland D. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701-710.
26. Pagnano MW, Hebl J, Horlocker T. Assuring a painless total hip arthroplasty: a multimodal approach emphasizing peripheral nerve blocks. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(4 suppl 1):80-84.
27. Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:86-90.
28. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Patients preferred a miniposterior THA to a contralateral two-incision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:156-159.
29. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1000-1006.
30. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(suppl 2 pt 1):50-73.
31. Palutsis RS, Sheridan KC, Wasielewski RC. One surgeon's experience with the 2-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;25:71-75.
32. Perrin T, Dorr LD, Perry J, Gronley J, Hull DB. Functional evaluation of total hip arthroplasty with five- to ten-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;195:252-260.
33. Perron M, Malouin F, Moffet H, McFadyen BJ. Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000;15:504-515.
34. Sicard-Rosenbaum L, Light KE, Behrman AL. Gait, lower extremity strength, and self-assessed mobility after hip arthroplasty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M47-M51.
35. Tanavalee A, Jaruwannapong S, Yuktanandana P, Itiravivong P. Early outcomes following minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a two-incision approach versus a mini-posterior approach. Hip Int. 2006;16(suppl 4):17-22.
36. Waldman BJ. Minimally invasive total hip replacement and perioperative management: early experience. J South Orthop Assoc. 2002;11:213-217.
37. Ward SR, Jones RE, Long WT, Thomas DJ, Dorr LD. Functional recovery of muscles after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:249-254.
38. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh S. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics. 2002;25:1031-1043.
39. Whatling GM, Dabke HV, Holt CA, Jones L, Madete J, Alderman PM, Roberts P. Objective functional assessment of total hip arthroplasty following two common surgical approaches: the posterior and direct lateral approaches. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008;222:897-905.